The denotations seem to me the same:  there is a label; it is sticking; the 
surface is the forehead;  ie., they give the same basic information with 
slightly different emphases.  I think the implications are slightly different but 
the "facts" referred to are not different; so the words "denote" the same 
thing.  Are you using "denotation" differently from the way I am?

Date sent:      	Fri, 09 Mar 2001 07:45:54 -0500
Send reply to:  	[log in to unmask]
From:           	Marcia Karp <[log in to unmask]>
To:             	[log in to unmask]
Subject:        	Re: Eliot's letters--Gordon's Biography - erratum

Nancy Gish wrote in response to Arwin on Arwin:

> One could say either "on" or "to" in that particular phrase; they just
> have slightly different meanings.  But I couldn't give you a rule for
> when both are ok and when they aren't.  In this case, "on" implies that
> it is on your forehead AND it is sticking.  "To" implies that it the
> sticking is TO the forehead.  Slight but not the same.
> That's probably sticking too - "on" appears to be one of those horrible
> Dutchisms that I'm so afraid of when writing English ... ;-)
> A.
> > Before you know it I'll be wearing thick rimmed
> > glasses and have a four letter label sticking on my forehead. ;-)

Aren't these denotations, not implications?