LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L  June 2017

GERMAN-CFP-L June 2017

Subject:

CFP (journal special issue): Engaging the Pastoral in Contemporary Literature

From:

Necia Chronister <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

German Studies CFP Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:41:08 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (34 lines)

STUDIES IN TWENTIETH AND TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY LITERATURE
Special Issue

Engaging the Pastoral: Social, Environmental, and Artistic Critique in Contemporary Pastoral Literature (Special Issue)

Edited by Melinda A. Cro (Kansas State University) & Rachel Paparone (Ithaca College)

Pastoral literature and socially engaged literature are two terms not often seen together. The word "pastoral" most often calls to mind bucolic landscapes peopled by rustic shepherds, attractive shepherdesses, and frolicking sheep. Indeed, scholars often characterize the pastoral genre, at least in its more classical forms, as an idealization of the landscape and its inhabitants, accusing the genre of glossing over the difficulties of rural life. American scholar Richard Schneider emphasizes the escapist tendencies of pastoral, pointing out that the mode "tends to privilege a past when humans were closer to nature, everything was better than today, and there were no problems of everyday living so that one had time to contemplate the meaning of life" (vii). Such critiques are not unusual--Raymond Williams is equally harsh in his critique of pastoral in his seminal work, The Country and the City (1973), arguing that the “living tensions” inherent in “classical pastoral,” such as “pleasure with loss; harvest with labour; singing with a journey; past or future with the present [...]” are “excised” in the Renaissance adaptations. In fact, Williams argues that the reality of country life, even when it is rarely presented in pastoral works from the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries, is largely ignored by scholars as “utilitarian or materialist, perhaps even a peasant response” to the classical tradition (18). 

Yet characterizing pastoral literature as idealized or simplified is to ignore its enormous potential as a vehicle of social, religious, moral, and environmental criticism. American critic Lawrence Buell notes, “[...] pastoralism is a species of cultural equipment that western thought has for more than two millennia been unable to do without” (32). As scholar Arto Clerc reminds us, the pastoral genre is, and always has been, fraught with tension: between rural and urban, past and present, ideal and real (171). One need only look to the works of Jean Giono, Paul Valéry, and André Gide to find fruitful examples of this tension transposed to the twentieth-century and set against a backdrop at once tantalizingly evocative of and yet markedly different from that of classical Arcadia. Indeed, Catharine Savage Brosman notes, “The recourse to pastoral figures, conventions and themes among modern writers covers a range of uses and responses. While some are chiefly personal, others are intended more generally as a means of criticizing the 20th-century world [...] and provoking a change in the reader’s attitude” (222).  

Terry Gifford points out, however, that the cultural reality in which we find ourselves posits the term "pastoral" as highly contestable and deeply suspect (147). Indeed, given the current political and environmental climate, idealization of the landscape seems at best trivial and at worst a dangerous denial of the real threats facing contemporary society. As opposed to the tendency of pastoral representations toward idealization, anti-pastoral and post-pastoral tropes call attention to the highly romanticized landscape of pastoral, thus providing an implicit critique of the genre. Yet both post- and anti-pastoral modes of representation rely on the pastoral tradition to lend them their framework, since they can only be understood in relation to the more traditional pastoral trope. Gifford distinguishes anti-pastoral from post-pastoral, indicating that the latter is informed by the development of ecocriticism (as Buell had noted previously in his description of pastoralism) and what might be termed the ‘ecocritical’ conscience; that is, the recognition of the indissolubility of nature and culture, as opposed to satirical or ironic uses of the anti-pastoral that expose the “distance between reality and the pastoral convention” (128). Of particular interest to note is that Gifford argues that the same work can demonstrate characteristics of pastoral, post-pastoral, and anti-pastoral all at once, lending a certain richness to the pastoral text in terms of engagement that has often been overlooked. 

How, then, does contemporary literature, film, and music respond to or grapple with the notion of pastoral? How does this mode ever-present in western thought find expression in the literature, film, and music of the twentieth- and twenty-first-centuries? Furthermore, how do pastoral texts today engage with recent social, cultural, artistic and even theoretical developments, such as ecocriticism or sound theory? How do authors utilize the inherent tensions within the mode, the conventions of escape and return, to express the development of the modern? How do these works demonstrate and contribute to the development of the ecocritical conscience? Do these works dialogue with the classical pastoral past and, if so, to what end? This special issue of Studies in Twentieth- and Twenty-First- Century Literature seeks to answer these questions across the French, German, and Spanish-language literatures. 

Articles must be written in English and should not exceed 7,500 words in length. Articles may address French, German, and/or Spanish-language texts. Proposals that make use of the innovative and interactive potential of the journal’s online platform will be of particular interest. Authors must provide a 500-word abstract along with a brief CV (2 pages), complete contact details, and academic affiliation. Abstracts must be submitted by September 15, 2017. Notification of selection for inclusion in the volume will be made by October 15, 2017. The deadline for the submission of the final article is set for February 15, 2018.

Melinda A. Cro ([log in to unmask])
Rachel Paparone ([log in to unmask])

Works Cited
Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1995. 
Clerc, Arto. "Engagements pastoraux et utopiques au XVIIe siècle." MLN. 120.1 (2005): 170-180. 
Gifford, Terry. Pastoral. New York: Routledge, 1999. 
Savage Brosman, Catharine. “The Pastoral in Modern France: Forms and Reflections.” French Forum 9.2 (1984): 212-224.
Schneider, Richard J. "Introduction." Dark Nature: Anti-Pastoral Essays in American Literature and Culture. New York: Lexington, 2016.
Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1973.

*******************
The German Studies Call for Papers List
Editor: Sean Franzel
Assistant Editor: Olaf Schmidt
Sponsored by the University of Missouri
Info available at: https://grs.missouri.edu/german/resources

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager