LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


TSE@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  August 2015

TSE August 2015

Subject:

Re: New publication 'The Contemporary Novel': an essay by T. S. ELIOT

From:

"Rickard A. Parker" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

T. S. Eliot Discussion forum.

Date:

Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:51:13 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (41 lines)

Someone else has found the Eliot essay that I pointed you to yesterday at:
   http://www.the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article1592488.ece



http://flavorwire.com/532736/newly-discovered-t-s-eliot-essay-mocks-d-h-lawrence-aldous-huxley
Flavorwire
Books
Newly Discovered T.S. Eliot Essay Mocks D.H. Lawrence, Aldous Huxley
By Jonathon Sturgeon
August 13, 2015 12:30 pm


Yesterday the Times Literary Supplement published a short, incisive piece of literary criticism by T.S. Eliot that had never before seen the light of day. The essay, titled "The Contemporary Novel," was promised to Edmund Wilson of The New Republic in 1926/27 (things moved less quickly in those days), but the typescript, entrusted to Eliot’s mother, was never sent. It remained in her collection until now, and it will reappear in the forthcoming The Complete Prose of T. S. Eliot: The critical edition; Volume Three – Literature, Politics, Belief, 1927–1929.

Unlike much rediscovered literature found this year, Eliot’s essay immediately reveals itself to be a major work of literature. It begins with a premise — that the contemporary English novel shows insufficient "moral preoccupation," evidenced by a lack of psychological depth  — and proceeds with a tour of the best contemporary fiction (of the 1920s). The setup allows Eliot to kiss and slap his targets at the same time — there is nothing he loved to do more. And his targets are big and unmoving.

Take, for example, Eliot’s gleeful snubbing of D.H. Lawrence. Eliot calls Lawrence a "demoniac, a natural and unsophisticated demoniac with a gospel," adding:

    When his characters make love – or perform
    Mr. Lawrence’s equivalent for love-making – and
    they do nothing else – they not only lose all the
    amenities, refinements and graces which many
    centuries have built up in order to make love-making
    tolerable; they seem to reascend the metamorphoses
    of evolution, passing backward beyond ape and fish
    to some hideous coition of protoplasm.

Next, Eliot courts Virginia Woolf ...

    She is not only civilized but prefers civilization
    to barbarism; and she writes with great care,
    always extremely well and in one at least of the
    great traditions of English prose, and sometimes
    with astonishing beauty.

... before suggesting that her novels are merely contemporary and so lacking in the requisite moral vision.

Still, Woolf comes away relatively unscathed compared to Aldous Huxley, whom Eliot calls "the sort of writer who must produce thirty bad novels before he arrives at the good one." Nevertheless, Eliot admits that Huxley has "a certain natural, if undeveloped talent for seriousness," even if this talent is "oppressed" by "a gift for chic."

But as entertaining as it is to watch Eliot burn his victims, it’s more worthwhile to find him pondering the meaning of the "contemporary" in contemporary literature — something we do too rarely today. For Eliot, contemporary literature in 1926/27 was marked by "a bewildering diversity of forms and contents" that still, as I wrote above, left little room for the (fairly conservative) moral preoccupations he held dear. Somewhat paradoxically, Eliot explained that this lack of moral preoccupation led him to the "somewhat extreme conclusion that the contemporary English novel is behind the times." Part of the reason for this, we can surmise from his conclusion to the piece, is that contemporary literature of the time wasn’t dramatic enough. "Now the structure of Henry James’s books is dramatic," Eliot writes. "Conrad’s, in spite of some appearances, are not dramatic. And the contemporary novel is not dramatic." What’s the link between dramatic structure and probing, moral literature? Your guess is as good as mine.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager