Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Oh, well, John Ashberry isn't anybody's T S Eliot and probably wishes he
>could be "our John Ashberry" instead. But here's the real news in the piece:
>“A large percentage of poetry readers are fetishistic and like holding
>the physical book,” said Michael Wiegers, the executive editor of the
>nonprofit Copper Canyon Press, which specializes in poetry.
> OK all you fetishists, put down that book, turn your e-reader on, and
> Ken A
>On 9/16/2014 5:56 PM, Rickard A. Parker wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:49:52 -0400, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Yesterday's NY Times on the cover but below the fold had an article about improvements in formatting poetry books for e-books. The article began and ended with references to Ashbery's work. The above quote comes from the last paragraph and is said by the president of the Poetry Foundation.
>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.