LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L  January 2013

GERMAN-CFP-L January 2013

Subject:

CFP: CONTEXT (01-01-2014, Journal of Literary Theory Vol. 8, No. 1 (2014))

From:

"JLT, Deutsche Philologie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

German Studies CFP Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:50:44 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (137 lines)

Journal of Literary Theory Vol. 8, No. 1 (2014)

CONTEXT

Submission Deadline: January 01, 2014

CALL FOR ARTICLES

›Context‹ is often regarded as a foundational concept among those humanities
and sciences that are concerned with texts. One could argue that every theory
about texts or literature has to – either explicitly or implicitly – make
some assumptions about what a context is. Assuming that contexts are,
generally speaking, relations between a text and states of affairs external
to it (such as language, genres, other texts, culture, society, or history),
it is hardly imaginable that there is some theoretical enterprise concerning
texts which does not involve contexts. Consequently, models of textual
understanding as well as editorial or interpretative enterprises would have
to take all relevant contexts into account. Nevertheless, the notion has also
been discussed critically. It has been argued that it presupposes a specific
conception of text which is no longer tenable, and that it should therefore
be replaced by alternative concepts. It has even been suggested that the
difference between text and context is obsolete and should therefore be
abandoned altogether.

Compared to other foundational notions (e.g. ›author‹), ›context‹ has not yet
received the adequate amount of attention by the text studies, given its
importance. The concept, though often used, is explained rarely. The
discourse is mostly dominated by a more or less non-technical usage of the
term, which comprises various ways of speaking. This situation calls for
terminological clarification of the concept.

A closer look at different textual and literary theories reveals a vast
variety of opinions regarding the question which contexts are relevant and
provide fruitful grounds for the interpretation of literature. Structuralists
argue that texts are defined by their systematic semiotic relations.
Post-structuralists concentrate on discursive and intertextual references and
relations. Author-oriented approaches emphasize contexts of production, such
as authors’ biographies, other works, or facts that might reveal information
about their intentions. Reader-oriented approaches focus on the cognitive
capacities of readers and their aesthetic judgements. Those accounts
generally describe context as knowledge and capacities on part of the reader.
Theories that concentrate on society and culture have proposed models that
relate context and text to each other in terms of system theory, theories of
action, or social field theory. This list can easily be expanded.
Consequently disagreement about the question which theoretical foundation
should be used to analyze text and context prevails. This pluralism of
theories calls for a critical survey as well as further reflection on the
concept, which would allow to go beyond the status quo of fundamental
disagreement. Furthermore, texts in digital media seem to pose entirely new
challenges for the humanities and their use of the concept.

Currently, a variety of contexts is factored into textual inquiries. However,
it is rarely made explicit which criteria guide the decision about which
contexts to include, and what follows from those decisions. Thus, it seems
necessary to reflect methodologically on the significance of contexts for
literary and textual inquiries.

Possible topics and questions could include, but are not limited to:

What does ›context‹ refer to? What should it mean?
How is the concept to be distinguished from related concepts, such as
›cotext‹ or ›situation‹? What are the systematic relations between those
concepts? What is the relation between ›context‹ and ›discourse‹?
Is there an adequate way to classify the variety of states of affairs that
are referred to as ›context‹?

How should the relation between text and context be described?
Which facts constitute the context as the environment for a text?
What kinds of entities are contexts?
What is the role of contexts in textual understanding?

How can it be decided whether a context is adequate, relevant, or fruitful
for a certain text?
What role do contexts play in the formulation and verification of hypotheses
about texts?
What role do contexts play in scientific argumentation?

Is there a need for revised terminology as well as new methods, due to new
media and digital artifacts? How would those concepts or methods have to look
like?

Is it possible to retain some notion of context despite the criticism that
has been voiced, or does it presuppose conceptions in textual theory that are
no longer tenable? How could the concept be replaced?

We encourage submissions from all language and literature departments as well
as other fields within the humanities and social sciences that consider texts
as their subject, such as philosophy, or history. Furthermore, we welcome
submissions from fields that concentrate on other artifacts, but face similar
challenges, such as media studies, history of art, or musicology.

Contributions should not exceed 50,000 characters in length and have to be
submitted until January 1, 2014. Please submit your contribution
electronically via our website www.jltonline.de under ›Articles‹.

Articles are chosen for publication by an international advisory board in a
double-blind review process.

For further information about JLT and to view the submission guidelines,
please visit www.jltonline.de or contact the editorial office at
[log in to unmask]

SUBMISSIONS THAT DO NOT FOCOUS ON ONE OF OUR SPECIAL TOPICS CAN BE SUBMITTED
CONTINUOUSLY VIA OUR WEBSITE.

JLT aims to publish work on fundamental issues in methodology and the
construction of theories and concepts, as well as articles on particular
literary theories. Case studies, i.e. studies on specific authors, works, or
problems of literary history, are accepted only if they adopt a predominantly
systematic perspective, contribute to the reconstruction of the history of
literary theory, or pursue innovative methods. Moreover, the Journal of
Literary Theory contains work reviewing and outlining trends of theoretical
debates in literary theory and related disciplines.

Please contact the editorial office for further details.

Hannes Worthmann

Assistant Editor
JLT - Journal of Literary Theory
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Seminar für Deutsche Philologie
Käte-Hamburger-Weg 3
37073 Göttingen

0049 - (0)551 - 39 – 7534

[log in to unmask]
www.JLTonline.de
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jlt

*******************
The German Studies Call for Papers List
Editor: Stefani Engelstein
Assistant Editor:  Olaf Schmidt
Sponsored by the University of Missouri
Info available at: http://grs.missouri.edu/resources/gerlistserv.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager