The typist and young man seem to be portrayed as in an ongoing
relationship. Eliot it seems to me is condemning the perfunctory
nature of their sexual relation. She regards it as obligatory. She has
no dream of love. By creating these specific characters to make his
point Eliot indicates that he sees lower class people as animalistic.
Sent from my iPod
On May 11, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Of course she would not. But the term "assaults" remains a violent
> term. She simply accepts; she does not engage or desire or anything.
> >>> Diana Manister <[log in to unmask]> 05/11/10 2:26 PM >>>
> Nancy the ostensible purpose of letting the young man into her
> apartment was sex it seems to me. They weren't there to listen to the
> gramaphone or have tea or anything else. He seems boorish, it's true,
> but hardly a rapist. She betrays no indignation or victimhood after he
> Sent from my iPod
> On May 10, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Today the typist scene would pretty certainly be called "date rape."
> > She has no desire but simply lets him "assault" her. The language
> > makes clear that it is an act done to her, not with her. It may not
> > be the same as a violent rape, but it is a deliberate and extreme
> > violation. That concept might not have been commonly called that
> > then, but the act would have been the same.
> > Nancy
> > >>> Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> 05/10/10 10:16 PM >>>
> > Tom,
> > Aside from the question of whether Eugenides is a rapist or not or
> > "asked me" becomes an "assault," how is the typist scene a rape? It
> > seems to be wholly in the cards, as it were, not at all unexpected
> > either party.
> > Ken A
> > >
> > > As I discussed last year, in my reading, Eugenides is a homosexual
> > > rapist who sexually assaults the narrator.
> > >
> > > My evidence:
> > >
> > > 1) The Eugenides lines are sandwiched between a description of the
> > > rape of Philomela and the rape of the typist.
> > >