Diana Manister wrote:
> Ken apparently you missed Rick's post in which he said he found the
> notion of Pound psychoanalyzing Eliot amusing. He wrote that in
> response to my claim that Pound took TWL on its own terms as the
> expression of a dissociated personality and did not try to have Eliot
> "unify" it.
> That's what Rick wrote, and prompting me to waste my time to correct
> your false statement is irresponsible on your part.
This is a discussion list. If it wastes your time, go somewhere else.
In another post, you said it was my quip. What am I supposed to think?
I actually had to read back through some of my posts to see if I said
it, as it would be funny, after all, to think of EP psychoanalyzing TSE.
Or anyone. La la, people will quip. Some of the wildest come from you.
No one is evil by dint of disagreeing with you or by joking about some
scenario a post of yours sets up. That's the way conversation goes.
Relax. You're not in control.