In that case, I did NOT provide a "label". I'm safer so!
Cheers,
CR
--- On Tue, 3/30/10, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Epigraphs are not
> labels. I do not think Carrol meant that at all.
> //"Christian" or "mystic" is a
> label.//
>
> Carrol?
>
> >>> Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]> 03/30/10
> 12:28 PM >>>
> PS - As for poems doing "more interesting" and
> "important" things, interests, I suppose, may
> vary. - CR
>
> --- On Tue, 3/30/10, Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > I
> > don't thiink prefatory quotations merely label
> > -- they are famed to perform multiple tasks.
> >
> > Among other things, they can point to dreams and
> > aspirations, as in this case.
> >
> > Eliot himself was very fond of writing epigraphs -- to
>
> > me these did not diminish the scope of his work.
> >
> > You're more knowledgeable, though.
> >
> > Here's an instance:
> http://www.c3.hu/~prophil/profi004/SWEENEY2.html
> >
> > Your pardon,
> > CR,
> >
> > --- On Sun, 3/28/10, Carrol Cox
> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Carrol Cox <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism
>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 5:56 PM
> >
> >
> > I don't understand the motive of
> > pinning labels on a poet. If anyone
> > wants to pin any label they like on any poet, and
> spend
> > their time
> > 'proving' that the label is accurte, go to it.
>
> > I'm just not interested
> > in having a conversation with them. Poems do lots of
> > things, and almost
> > all of those things are far more intesting and
> important
> > than any label
> > one can pin on either poet or peom.
> >
> > Carrol
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|