LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


TSE@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  March 2010

TSE March 2010

Subject:

Re: 'Gerontion'

From:

DIana Manister <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

T. S. Eliot Discussion forum.

Date:

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:47:04 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (224 lines)

Ken, I don't recall applying the word "disgusting" to Gerontion. If  
you can cite it, I'll stand corrected.

I said Eliot's depiction of the Jew was "sordid" which was obviously  
his intent,  since he could have portrayed him as a respectable figure  
had he chosen to.

Eliot said he seriously considered becoming a Buddhist but had certain  
reservations. I don't think he spelled them out but he did indicate  
that the cultural difference was too great for him to adjust to. TWL  
shows that he was enamored of Buddhism at that time (as Nancy noted,  
after Gerontion was written.)

"Reading back" Eliot's later conversion into Gerontion is contradicted  
by Eliot's
own statements.

He was a great admirer of many Christian writers as we know, and  
sometimes adopted the cadences of the King James bible in his poems.  
Even an atheist can recognize great writing styles; Eliot's admiration  
is no confirmation of belief. His conversion occurred later. It would  
be odd, wouldn't it, if he were a believer even from the Gerontion  
period but got so little hope from his faith that he would go on to  
write so devastated a poem as The Wasteland?

Diana

Sent from my iPod

On Mar 6, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> There are many ways to be serious; they do not require  
> Christianity.  And those poems are, in my view also, serious.  I do  
> not see the connection.
>
> I have just been rereading a mass of the letters from 1919.  One  
> very interesting characteristic is the total absence of any comment  
> on religion of any kind: it is all about writing or societal gossip  
> or Vivienne, or his work at the bank.
>
> I am at a loss to see what you mean by the evidence you claim unless  
> you mean the very odd note that "Bleistein's way" means Eliot's is  
> Christian instead.  I have no idea how to comment on that, as it  
> means nothing.  It could well have been that his way was Buddhist or  
> that he simply objected to Bleistein.
>
> Interestingly, Eliot told Lytton Strachey on 1 June 1919, "You are  
> very - ingenuous - if you can conceive me conversing with rural  
> deans in the cathedral close.  I do not go to cathedral towns but to  
> centres of industry.  My thoughts are absorbed in questions more  
> important than ever enter the heads of deans - as why it is cheaper  
> to buy steel bars from America than from Middlesborough, and the  
> probable effect - the exchange dificulties with Poland - and the  
> appreciation of the rupee.  My evenings in Bridge. . . . I feel  
> sufficiently specialised, at present, to inspect or hear any ideas  
> with impunity."  He mentions Sundays a lot--as days when he can or  
> does travel.
>
> Hard to imagine those remarks about the heads of deans in cathedral  
> towns by the late 20s.  As for his statement about his own  
> inclination to Buddhism (at the time of TWL, later than  
> "Gerontion"), I'll have to find it.  But he had, earlier, attended  
> meetings of a Buddhist society and had studied Eastern thought  
> intensively at Harvard.
>
> If you want to read a Christian vision into anything he said, you  
> are quite free to do so; it is not, however, a "truth" or a  
> generally assumed view, and you give no basis in any of his own  
> statements or his life.
>
> But Diana never has said he was "merely disgusting," and there is no  
> reason to be nasty.
>
> As for the complicated development of Eliot's ideas (as opposed to a  
> simple constant of Christian vision) I would suggest reading Ron  
> Schuchard's Eliot's Dark Angel.
> Nancy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> Ken Armstrong 03/06/10 6:06 PM >>>
> Incredibly, you have ignored the very evidence I said you would, in  
> the very post to which ostensibly you are responding. Let me know  
> where, then, TSE claimed he was not a Christian when he wrote  
> Gerontion. Let's suppose it exists (I simply don't recall).  I would  
> still point to exacly these poems and say they present a Christian  
> vision, for the reasons noted previously.
>
> For George if he has not found the quote, in a letter covering many  
> topics, TSE wrote to his brother regarding the group of poems being  
> published called Ara Vos Prec and Poems 1920: "Some of the new  
> poems, the Sweeney ones, especially "Among the Nightingales" and  
> "Burbank" are intensely serious, and I think these two are among the  
> best I have ever done. But even here I am considered by the ordinary  
> Newspaper critic as a Wit or satirist, and in America I suppose I  
> shall be thought merely disgusting."
>
> Is it fair to say he saw Diana coming?
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2010, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> As I said in an earlier message, I have written on the significance  
> of the epigraph--in the paper in Florence.  And I noted that it had  
> to do with the notion of being in "an after dinner sleep."  But it  
> is also said to one who expects death on the orders of a hypocrite.   
> It is connected with other images, but that is a long topic.  But it  
> is not the case that no one has taken it up.
> Moreover, the first person--to my knowledge--who claimed he was not  
> a Christian when he wrote TWL (which was composed after "Gerontion")  
> was Eliot himself.  I am not sure where, but I have read it more  
> than once. Growing up in a Christian culture is simply true for most  
> Americans until recently, and as someone pointed out, it was also,  
> in Eliot's case, Unitarianism, which he rejected. That religious  
> concerns are present from his earliest work is clear, but what he  
> believed, and when, is not, nor does a specific belief shape the  
> meanings of the poems until, perhaps to some extent, his later  
> overtly religious ones.
> For example, "In July 1917 he acknowledged that life was poor  
> without religon, but as yet he was unconvinced it was the greatest  
> of all satisfactions and so worth the effort" (Gordon).  "Gerontion"  
> was composed in February 1919; the definite conversion we know of  
> was in 1926.  According to Peter Ackroyd, "In 1919 he discussed the  
> sermons of John donne and Lancelot Andrewes--'a writer of genius',  
> he called the latter--but at this stage he was objective about the  
> claims of Christianity itself and compared the work of these two  
> eminent divines with Buddha's Fire Sermon' " (Ackroyd). [Notably,  
> this is long past the 1910-1911 composition date of "Prufrock.") To  
> read concepts in a poem back into the writer's life is a kind of  
> false use of biography in reverse.  All the vehement objections to  
> using known facts about his life, and his own words, that have come  
> up on this list are rather odd in the face of this use of poems to  
> assume biography.
> So to start from an assumption of "Christian commitment" at the time  
> of composition--unless you have evidence not known to Gordon or  
> Ackroyd or Eliot himself--is clearly the kind of problem Carrol  
> defines.  It is an imposition based on the presence of some words in  
> the poems, words one can find in masses of literature not written by  
> believers.
> So do you have such evidence?  I would really be interested to read  
> any statements of Eliot's or people who knew him well that he had  
> embraced Christianity as a belief by  1919.
> Nancy
>
>
> >>> Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> 03/06/10 3:42 PM >>>
> Carrol Cox wrote:
> >> On Mar 5, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> The poem contains A LOT of Chritian elements and so they need to  
> be
> >>> dealt
> >>> with.
> >>> Are we to pretend they aren't there?
> >>>
> >
> > So does Lightr in August. So the question is, first of all, from  
> what
> > perspective are we to approach the explanation of these items. In  
> both
> > cases we have knowledge that it is simply childish to ignore:  
> Neither
> > Faulkner when he wrote Light in Aughuse nor Eliot when he wrote
> > Gerontion was Christian. So the interpretive 'problem' involves
> > expalinng the existence of Christian imagery or references in a
> > non-Christian poem written within a given cultural context.
> >
> > I don't care to waste time or energy responding to arguments which  
> begin
> > with a clear error and by rigojrous logic end up in bedlam. The idea
> > that Gerontion was a Christian poem is the kind of error that makes
> > further discussion pointless.
> >
> Carrol und Alles,
>
> Why is it pointless to discuss? The error seems to me to be yours (&
> others'), and an error, to be accurate, of the most simplistic kind.  
> You
> assume you know the constitution of Eliot's inner life prior to 1927,
> but logic (bad logic is one of my pet peeves, too, and Lord knows
> there's plenty to be peevish about on this list) doesn't dictate at  
> all
> that to be committed to a Christian vision he had to be publicly
> baptized in a particular Christian communion. Then, where there IS
> evidence of said Christian commitment, you (the general "you" of this
> class of Eliot readers, not to say of this sect of co-conspirators
> [.........that last is a joke.....]) simply deny it or gloss over it:
> "But this or such was Bleistein's way" could not have been a louder
> announcement of Eliot's particular poetic way (as he conceived of it),
> the way of the crucified Christ. Now, my definition of "pointless" is
> not admitting this into the discussion, and with self-righteous
> expressions of fatigue at having to entertain scenarios which do not  
> fit
> your world view. If you "don't care to waste time or energy responding
> to arguments which begin with a clear error," how is that I keep  
> reading
> exactly, by your professed lights, those posts from you? Seems a tad
> disingenuous.
>
> Missed or not, I'm sorry to be little present to the Gerontion
> threads. I've been rereading Guy Brown's appreciation of the poem, ten
> years old now, and laboring under a heavy work schedule. There have  
> been
> a few good calls for substantiation of certain claims or to take into
> account the syntax of the poem and Guy's reading supplies those
> interstices of thought and word in great detail, line by line,  
> stanza by
> stanza, source by source (you're right about Dream of Gerontius,  
> Diana),
> word by word, and epigraph. I'm surprised here that no one has really
> taken up the significance of the epigraph.
>
> I looked up the letter in which TSE predicts how his Poems 1920 would
> be taken and will post it later if no one else does.
>
> Ken

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager