> Marcia Karp wrote:
> All the silk I know of is porous, though, I imagine, a leather condom
> would have other drawbacks (so to speak). I guess it depends on how
If, as I suggested earlier, menused condoms primarily to protect against
VD, wishful thinking and lack of knowledge would have made _any_ kind of
protection would make almost anything better than nothing! If the
earliest references are Elizabethan, that wouild fit in with a
16th-century sprad of syphilis in Europe.