DIana Manister wrote:
> We can say Prufrock is an aardvark too, according to your
> laissez-faire approach. But why not apply those wild imaginings to a
> poem of your own, if Eliot's text is being ignored?
DIana, let's spare the listers the silliness. No one is ignoring the
text. CR's was a simple probe, not a critique written in stone, and my
question didn't seem all that tough, either.
Excuse me, gotta go, I hear that goat coughing overhead again.