I greatly appreciate your post, Rick. Many thanks. - CR
--- On Sat, 2/6/10, Rickard A. Parker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Well CR, when I saw the subject line
> of your post popup in my list and
> remembering another recent political themed post from you I
> thought you
> were inching across the line. When I scrolled down to
> your expected
> Eliot quotation though, although there was no LOL, I did
> get a big
> > "Should I, after tea and cakes and ices,
> > Have the strength to force the moment to its crisis?"
> As for the link as an ad: I didn't read the webpage but the
> teaser you
> gave made it seem that you linked to an informative
> article; maybe one
> curious Old World readers might find interesting. I didn't
> have to
> listen for a minute before getting to read the rest of what
> you had to
> say and I didn't have to click the link. Still, I would ask
> you to eschew
> things like this and, in the future, remember that at TSE
> links get leeway.
> Rick Parker
> Chokh Raj wrote:
> > My post on Tea Party -- it was rather inquisitive in
> nature than an advertisement -- I was in two minds,
> nonetheless -- to post or not to post -- I'm sure, though,
> there is nothing "disgusting" about it. For me it's like
> sharing an OT that rocks the people of a nation -- US on the
> horns of a dilemma, I suppose.
> > As for poetry, it breathes freedom.
> > Finally, Diana's note is more persuasive -- and so I
> readily yield :)
> > Thanks, Diana.
> > CR