LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L  January 2008

GERMAN-CFP-L January 2008

Subject:

CFP: The German Schauerroman and its International Contexts (Germany) (2/15/08; 1/30-2/1/09)

From:

Megan McKinstry <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

German Studies CFP Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:22:02 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (128 lines)

>
>From:       	 [log in to unmask]
>Subject:	CFP: The German Schauerroman and its International Contexts
>

Call for Papers:

Populäre Erscheinungen: Der deutsche Schauerroman um 1800 im internationalen
Kontext/ Popular Visions: The German Schauerroman and its International
Contexts

The Gothic has long been recognised as an 
integral component of literary history
and cultural studies in anglo-american literary studies.  This is by no means
true of the German “Schauerroman”.  Although German and English forms of the
Gothic were the object of similarly intense critical debate from the late
1780s, the Schauerroman has almost completely disappeared from German literary
histories (and indeed many of these works have actually disappeared into the
vaults of German libraries).  From its inception, the Schauerroman was
criticised as populist and trivial, and this entirely negative portrayal has
continued, with few exceptions, until the present.  Despite critical
questioning of concepts of canonization since the 1960s, there has been almost
no considered Germanist or comparative study of the German Schauerroman on the
basis of modern literary, critical and cultural theory. The aim of this
conference, organised in conjunction with Trinity College Dublin, is not,
however, merely the “rehabilitation”, but a differentiated and critical
reconsideration of a forgotten literary mode on the basis of modern theoretical
concepts.  Rather than merely dismissing the Schauerroman as the anti-rational,
anti-modern and trivial pendant to the rational works of the Enlightenment and
Classicism, modern analytical methods such as Cultural Materialism, New
Historicism and Historical Anthropology can enable an important reconsideration
of the mode.  When viewed as a concomitant element of literary and social
processes of modernization in the course of the Enlightenment, existing on an
axis running parallel with and not opposite to the rationalization of social
and cultural modernity and providing a medium for the articulation for the
uncertainties and anxieties, the taboos and internal problems of modernity,
then one can move beyond the unsatisfactory and pejorative labelling of the
Schauerroman as trivial. The Gothic thus becomes a test-case for critical
approaches of dealing with popular cultural phenomena; indeed there is a case
to be made, that the Gothic be considered as the first modern literary
phenomenon of mass-culture.  Of importance are also the inter- and
intra-cultural transfer processes: the Gothic around 1800 is a thoroughly
international mode and develops as a conglomerate of translations, adaptations
and plagiarisms and is thus an important example of developing processes of
cultural transfer in modern Europe and beyond.
	Some (by no means all) of the central questions to be addressed are:
• Can the Schauerroman be defined more precisely: where does the term first
arise and how has it been defined (e.g. “Ritter-, Räuber- and Schauerromane” as
a problematic and confusing “moniker” that requires re-consideration)? Does
“Schauerroman” transcend historical borders as a meta-term or is it
historically limited to the period “around 1800”? Would a differentiation
between “Schauerroman” and “Schauerliteratur” (as parallel to Gothic novel and
Gothic Fiction) be constructive? How do these different dimensions of the term
interact? Is Schauerroman merely a particular form of the Fantastic or should
one differentiate these? Which works can be considered as Schauerromane and can
one reconstruct a “canon”?
• The “limits” of the Schauerroman: the mysterious events in the Schauerroman
are no longer considered wonderful or fairytale-like, rather they are coloured
by a disruption either in the text itself or at the level of reader-reception.
The question that arises is where the borders to a literature of the wonderful
can be drawn? Can the Schauerroman be better defined through these limits? What
role does the Schauerroman have in Enlightenment poetics (of the wonderful)?
Where and when (if at all) does the Schauerroman end? Can one differentiate the
Schauerroman from forms of the literary fantastic in and after Romanticism? Are
such differences actually useful or helpful?  The question of the relations
between the Schauerroman and “High-Literature” shall also need to be addressed.
• The Schauerroman “around 1800” is part of an intense process of cultural
transfer between England, France and Germany.  How should one deal with this
international nature of the mode? How important are these transfer processes
for the development of individual national forms such as the Schauerroman? What
translation and reception processes can one identify in these international
relations? Does this international nature have consequences for the definition
of “Schauerroman” as a literary historical term?
• What is the relationship of the Schauerroman to the canonical
“High-Literature” of the late Enlightenment prose-market, poetry and Weimar
Classicism (e.g. Goethe, Schiller, Bürger, Göttinger Hain)?
• The Schauerroman and the history of its own literary history: e.g. how does
the traditional categorization of the Schauerroman as trivial and populist
hinder its criticism and consideration within literary history? Can one
“rehabilitate” or better contextualise the Schauerroman through recourse to
modern theories of popular culture studies? What role can the consideration of
the literary market (publishing, readership, distribution of works etc.) play
in these critical methods? Does the important role of women as writers and
readers of this fiction influence such critical procedures?
• Is the term “Schauerroman” an indication of its contextualisation within
(late-) Enlightenment anthropology? Can theoretical concepts of the pleasure of
anxiety be explained as general trend within the 
(late-) Enlightenment? Are such
theories satisfactory for explanations and historical contextualisation of the
Schauerroman?
• The Gothic as part of Cultural Studies: is the identification of the
Schauerroman and the Gothic as a part of late-Enlightenment modernization and
modernity (as has become apparent in Anglo-American discussions) also relevant
for the German context in the light of theories of a delayed modernity?  Can
tropes such as the spectre and monstrosity be considered as metaphorical or
symbolic forms to articulate or problematize technological, scientific or
medial modernization (e.g. can one view ghost stories as a means of integrating
the phantasmagoria into society)? Is the historical novel of chivalry a
heterotopic space in which contemporary social and political issues can be
addressed? What themes and areas of modernity come into question here (e.g.
secret societies, religion etc.)?

Venue and dates of the conference:

Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg from 30 Jan - 1 Feb 2009



>
>Please send your abstracts (in English or German) of no more than 250 words by
>15th February 2008 to:
>
>Barry Murnane					Andrew Cusack
>Institut für Germanstik 
>	               	Dept. of Germanic Studies
>Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg  		Trinity College Dublin
>06099 Halle (Saale)	                       		Dublin 2
>Germany		                               	Rep. of Ireland
>
>
>[log in to unmask]		  	 [log in to unmask]

*******************
The German Studies Call for Papers List
Editor: Stefani Engelstein
Assistant Editor:  Megan McKinstry
Sponsored by the University of Missouri
Info available at: http://www.missouri.edu/~graswww/resources/gerlistserv.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager