Diana Manister wrote:
> Carrol, someone riding in an elevator would not be interested in
> information about the engineering that makes it work. A visitor to the
> Empire State Building would probably not be interested in learning
> about reinforced concrete or how Art Deco differs from Bauhaus
> architecture. Builders of elevators, skyscrapers or poems need certain
> kinds of information that end-users of those things do not.
> Intellectual knowledge is only one tool -- it does not replace talent
> or intuition, but it is useful.
I agree with all this, but I don't understand your point. And what as it
to do with Pound's casual and passing use of a couple slogans, and the
relationship of those slogans to anything?