At 10:30 PM 8/29/2007, you wrote:
>give some sense of the "texture" of Williams, which contrasts to the
>take CR had on him. Whatever he was Williams was not remotely mystical
>or detached. He was aggressively attached, to the extent of being vulgar
>while speaking to professors.
Of course, none of that gainsays CR's take on the poem he quoted. As
frequently noted on this list, what a poet thinks he's doing and what he is
doing need not be the same thing.