Who needs to go beyond the corpse planting to get
associations with sin/guilt?
That CIA identity you outed in the capital,
has it begun to clout?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: The Yoruba and TSE
> cr mittal wrote:
> > Thanks for your very valid questions, Marcia. As I said, it's just a
> > reading
> > of sorts. It's only in the overall context of the TWL that I view "the
> > corpse"
> > and associate it with an act of savagery/lust/violence, an act of
> > guilt/sin.
> You can't do that. The "overall context" has no existence except in the
> local passages. It's an old hermeneutic principle that makes a lot of
> sense: In construing a local passage, _first_ make sense of it in
> isolation. There are of course difficulties here: It's called the
> Hermeneutic Circle. But not honoring those difficulties leads to utter
> nonsense. Anyone can make a text mean anything they want it to mean --
> but then others have no recourse but just ignore the resulting
> construals as not contributing to any useful conversation.
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.7/829 - Release Date: 6/2/2007