Just think: nothing to Google.
At 05:14 PM 9/12/2006, you wrote:
>"Thou Art That" gets close to articulating something that language can
>never really express, given its syntax. How to speak of a state of
>consciousness in which the subject is the object? Try it! I suppose that
>is why the Lao-Tze wrote: "He who speaks does not know. He who knows does
>not speak." Diana
>From: Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: causality
>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:05:23 -0400
>At 11:39 AM 9/12/2006, you wrote:
> >Ken wrote: "There are still selves and others."
> >I guess it depends on how rigid your boundaries are. Tat Tvam Asi -
> >That Art Thou, Thou Art That, would contradict your statement.
> Not if "that" and "thou" mean anything.
> Ken A.