At 05:28 PM 9/24/2006, Diana Manister wrote:
>Regarding Eliot's deviseness, I would go a step further and speculate that
>he seems to have been deeply committed to it, in the sense of seeing man
>and God as divided from each other. There is some evidence, as cited in
>Kearns' book T.S. Eliot and Indic Traditions, that Eliot identified more
>with the dualistic Christian worship of an external God than the Vedantic
>recognition of the identity of the deep self with Brahman.
Diana -- Your use of "divisive" and "dualistic" are novel to say the
least. "Seeing God and man as divided from each other" is certainly
traditional Christian belief, but this is not what is usually called
"dualistic" or even "divisive." Does Kearns employs this terminology?