LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives

TSE Archives

TSE Archives













By Topic:










By Author:











Monospaced Font



TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  September 2006

TSE September 2006


Wow -- formatting problems


Carrol Cox <[log in to unmask]>


T. S. Eliot Discussion forum.


Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:45:38 -0500





text/plain (361 lines)

The chaos in this post must be in one of the quoted posts rather than in
Diana's, since when I read the original I read hers without trouble, and
it formatted properly when first fwd and then run through e-mail
stripper (which usually gets rid of all mess). But the quoted posts came
out as below!!!!

Consider if the makers of antibiotics operated on Microsoft princples!


-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Identity of the speaker
in 'Preludes' Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:36:13 +0000 From: Diana Manister
<[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum."
<[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask]

Peter, perhaps someone can correct or confirm my understanding of "tat
vam asi" as meaning thusness, givenness, uninterpretable suchness, the
opposite of "fancies that are curled /Around these images, and
cling...." Diana

From: Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot
Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Identity of the speaker in 'Preludes' Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006
21:06:04 -0700

You're welcome. I agree that the Cartesian/Newtonian world is toast in
this poem.My preference is for the medieval understanding of multiple
causality. Post Locke,Hobbes, Hume there has been preoccupation with
efficient causality, the billiard ballapproach, which identifies only
the physical influence of one phenom. on another.There has been no
acceptance of formal, or final causality (or material causalityfor that
matter -- though Einstein has made a difference there). In effect, all
the focushas been on how, not on what or why. The temporalisation of
perceptionhas rejected the other dimensions as supersititions, and hence
the mystery has beensuppressed. I am moved by fancies that are curled
Around these images, and cling: The notion of some infinitely gentle
Infinitely suffering thing. We've just been through a very thorough
review and discussion of Eliot's involvement inthe world of sanskrit. It
is no minor influence on him. I'm sure the archives would tellyou all
we've done. Perhaps our grand master, Rickard, can point you in that
dimension.Your phrase, "tat vam asi" did not, however, come up in that
discussion as faras I remember. While the Cartesian influence is endemic
to our culture, I prefer, rather than trying to sus it out or experience
ontological shock, to see that one needs to reject the actual,
experiential conditioning of one's early childhoodand early education
(some are, of course, spared that tragedy), to reach one's natural
perceptual modeswhich have been supprssed by personal, social and
political influences. Hence I can be somewhat of anuisance when people
start to pedal those cliché modes. Regards,Peter

----- Original Message ----- From:marcin ostrouch To:
[log in to unmask] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:08 AM Subject:
Re: Identity of the speaker in 'Preludes' Indeed. For can we ever
"bracket our biased nature" (Shargel and Dwyer's phrasing)?

Thank you for the reference to Pound's poem. It is most illuminating.The
closing lines left me... well, moved. Let me bring up the Hindu "tat vam
asi" (Thou art that) again. It is common knowledge that TSE did some
reading in Upanishads, and so did Pound, I would imagine (I am not quite
familiar with the miglior fabro's background). "Tat vam asi" definitely
implies rejection of the everyday (Cartesian, categorising, alienating)
mode of perception.

Would you agree that the "dismembement" of the "They" (synecdochic
"feet", "hands"), and the atomised world, to which the speaker in
Preludes is awaken, is analogous to Cartesian "mutilation" of the One
("infinitely gentle, infinitely suffering thing")?

Just for the record: "ontological shock" is an expression taken from
Tillich's "Systematic Theology" (qtd. in "The literary Depiction of
Ontological Shock" by E.P. Levy [quite an interesting analysis of the
aforementioned condition in "East Cocker" and in Beckett's "Murphy"])

Once again, thank you for joining me and these issues.


Peter Montgomery wrote:

It is amazing how much of one's own perceptual conditioning can be found
in the poem. It isalso useful to reference Pound's Portrait d'un Femme,
which makes a fascinating companion piece. "Your mind and you are our
sargasso sea."

The poem is a spectral stone indeed.

P. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dunja Seselja"
<[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday,
September 04, 2006 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Identity of the speaker in

Very interesting idea, Peter. There are, in general, a lot similarities
between Preludes, Portrait of a Lady and Love Song of A.J. Prufrock.
Could it be that the Preludes mentioned in Portrait of a Lady are a
cross-reference to Eliot's own Preludes? It is also interesting that in
all three poems the subject is confronted with what Marcian called
"ontological shock" - he is overwhelmed with time and his finite
existence in it. Heideggerian being-to-death maybe? It is fascinating
how much of Heidegger can be found in early Eliot... written at least 10
years before Heidegger's main work was published.


--- Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

It might be worth considering "Portarait of a Lady"'s "You have the
scene arrange itself,as it will seem to do." P. ----- Original Message
----- From: "Dunja Seselja" <[log in to unmask]> To:
<[log in to unmask]> Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:34 PM Subject:
Re: Identity of the speaker in 'Preludes'

Dear Marcin,

I've been thinking of the questions you rose at


List and here are some ideas (and further


I've come up to. The subject appearing in Eliot's Preludes seems to


undetermined, and in so far, I guess it could be


see as the generic one. In any case, the main characteristic of the
subject (when I say the


I don't mean the subject of the speaker, but the subject the poem speaks
of, but in how far they


be distinguished at all, I'll say something a bit later) is his/her
passivity. While in the part I


subject is set against the world (being subjected


its course), in the part II (s)he is set against


time (being "condemned" to it) . (I think the


verse of the part II shares some of the ideas appearing in Prufrock, and
I'd be glad to discuss


issue as well). In the part III, we finally see the subject


something, but even that ("you tossed a blanket")


the action of removing = replying to what has


been there. But what this part seems to bring is


(only?) action left to the subject - to have a


(in solitude). Now, in the part IV, the subject of


speaker finally appears, but almost equivalent to


subject (s)he is talking about - it is again a passive subject (i am
moved... I cling...). The


verse reveals a sort of "catharsic" discovery of


subject (both the speaker and the one (s)he is speaking of), similar to
the relation of the


Greeks towards the destiny: as the destiny is uncontrollable even by
gods themselves, why making


much fuss about it? It seems to me that the status of the subject in


poem could be compared with Heidegger's notion of "being thrown into the
world" (excuse my


I'm not sure how this expression is to be


in English), as well as with the "eigentlich" and "uneigentlich" modes
of "Dasein". However, I don't see why the poem would stand in


opposition to the classical subject-object


and how would that be related to the "ontological shock" you mentioned.
If by "ontological shock"


consider the realization of the finiteness of


being, then this idea is definitely present in


Preludes and the Love Song of A.J. Prufrock, but I don't see how that
could be connected with an anti-Cartesian approach. Could you develop a


on that?



--- marcin ostrouch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I would like to raise the issue of identity of


speaker in /Preludes. / Please forgive me if you find it an open secret,


being a non-native speaker of English, and rather a novice at systematic
criticism, I find the question problematic.

At present I am attempting a reading of a couple


poems by TSE in the light of Heideggerian concept of authentic
existence. Therefore, I tend to shun the structuralist approach which


the grey volumes of my institute's library...

It does seem that throughout the poem the


of the speaker remains indeterminate.

Would you agree that the inflected pronoun "you"


the first stanza, and the same pronoun in the third, are generic


[as I am not quite informed in the use of those]

What is more, the generic character of the


seems to be deliberately strengthened by references to both sexes.

The governing consciousness, or if you like, the voice speaking in the
poem, (if there is ONE), seems to comply with


notion of Hindu /tat vam asi /("Thou art That"), or at any rate, as


Moody observes "[speaker's] ordinary, egoistical self is suspended".

Therefore the epistemic situation of the speaker seems to differ from
the traditonal Cartisian (subject-object) model.

The poem read in this way would come up to one


the modernist expressions of the epistemic trauma, or of what Tillich
calls "ontological shock".

Could you please comment on those intuitions of mine?

Is any one of you interested in hermeneutic


of TSE? Could you possibly recommend some articles or sources?

This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Search Archives

Search Archives

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995



Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager