At 05:17 PM 9/22/2006, Diana Manister wrote:
>CR wrote: I'm sorry but your remark, "Eliot, though an imaginative genius,
>had his own divisive vision. Alas." is rather off-the-cuff, Diana.There
>should be no confusion on this count if one reads Lyndon Gordon's "Eliot's
>Early Years". I got my basic clarity on the subject from it.
>CR: Rather than off the cuff, my remark was based on documentation as
>cited in this excerpt from the Boston Globe:
A rogues' gallery, I think, of a certain ideological bent and
willingness to revise, invent, and select "facts" to order. But do you mean
your clarity comes from the article, not even the works cited? That's a
definition of off-the-cuff, isn't it?