LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Archives


GERMAN-CFP-L@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L Home

GERMAN-CFP-L  January 2006

GERMAN-CFP-L January 2006

Subject:

CFP: Realism in European Film Theory and Cinema (2/20/06; collection)

From:

Megan McKinstry <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

German Studies CFP Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:07:30 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (158 lines)

>
>From: "Trifonova, Temenuga" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Subject: CFP: Realism in European Film Theory and Cinema (2/20/06; collection)
>
>Realism in European Film Theory and Cinema (2/20/06; collection)
>
>
>Submissions are sought for an edited collection 
>on European film theory and its relation
>to contemporary cinema. Of particular interest 
>are articles on the notion of realism in
>European film theory and cinema. What are the 
>philosophical and historical origins of
>European film realism (in all its varieties: 
>ontological, aesthetic, technological,
>social)? How has the notion of film realism changed over the years? What film
>techniques, styles, themes have been 
>traditionally privileged as reflecting most
>faithfully the ëclassicalí notion of realism? 
>Does our current understanding of realism
>privilege a different set of techniques, styles, 
>themes? What is the history of film
>realism in different European national cinemas? How has European film theory
>distinguished itself from American film theory 
>in its conception of film realism?
>Please email an abstract (500-1000 words) and a short bio (including recent
>publications) to [log in to unmask]  or send a hard copy to:
>
>Temenuga Trifonova
>Department of English
>The University of New Brunswick
>Carleton Hall, 247
>P.O. Box 4400
>Fredericton, NB
>E3B 5A3  Canada
>
>Deadline for abstracts: FEBRUARY 20, 2006
>Notification of accepted abstracts: MARCH 15, 2006
>
>
>Here are some possible ideas to explore:
>
>As Ian Aitken has argued, European film theory 
>has been shaped by Kantian idealism,
>Husserlís transcendental phenomenology with its 
>search for the ëdeep structuresí of
>experience, Brechtís theory of epic theatre, and 
>the Frankfurt schoolís critique of the
>culture industries. The aesthetic of Kracauer, 
>Arnheim, Balazs, Adorno and Marcuse,
>which aimed at promoting non-cognitive and 
>irrationalist forms of expression as a
>resistance to instrumental reason, was based on a redefinition of the idea of
>ëdistractioní into the more positively construed idea of ëindeterminacyí. The
>redemption of physical reality Kracauer 
>envisioned was possible thanks to the homology
>between the transient, undramatic, indeterminate 
>nature of the Lebenswelt and the
>equally indeterminate nature of the film image.
>
>However, this concept of indeterminacy has 
>undergone significant changes that have
>indirectly led to a redefinition of cinematic 
>realism. The indeterminate, transient,
>accidental nature of reality and of the film 
>image examined by Kracauer shares very
>little with the emphasis on accident, chance, 
>and destiny in recent films (e.g. films
>by Kieslowski, Tykwer, Haneke, as well as 
>various art films like Delphine Gleizeís
>Carnage, Jacques Rivetteís Va Savoir, AgnËs 
>Jaouiís The Taste of Others, and Tonie
>Marshallís Venus Institute).
>
>While Kracauer and Bazin located cinematic 
>realism in distraction and plotlessness,
>which they saw as structurally analogous to the unscripted, indeterminate,
>ëunderplottedí nature of reality, many recent 
>films dilute even further the modality or
>intensity of narrative, spatializing time into 
>disconnected and, through editing,
>treated as parallel narrative strands. This kind 
>of indeterminacy proceeds from
>overplotting, from an excess of disconnected, 
>reversible (i.e. meaningless) phenomena,
>events, and characters which acquire a minimal, 
>purely formal kind of significance by
>virtue of being placed alongside one another: 
>their only ëmeaningí consists in their
>allegedly simultaneous existence with other phenomena, events and characters.
>
>This gradual displacement of narrative by 
>associational discourse is partly made
>possible by mass culture. Only in mass culture 
>can one achieve the sort of ëpleasing
>arbitrarinessí whereby arbitrary vignettes are 
>strung together and still seem to make
>sense, because under the conditions of mass 
>culture all important differences between
>things become blurred so that arbitrary 
>connections between them become not only
>plausible but the only ones possible. Are we to 
>read the series of coincidences and
>arbitrary connections between events in recent 
>films positively or negatively? Is
>coincidence or chanceóboth of which are types of 
>samenessóan aspect of life in an
>indifferent, anonymous, mass culture, or is 
>coincidence a sign of the invisible,
>magical (metaphysical?) interconnectedness of everything?
>
>On one hand art cinema has made the formal 
>indeterminacy of classic realist theory into
>its new subject matter, obsessively staging 
>chance encounters and coincidences and
>oscillating between a positive interpretation of 
>these (chance and indeterminacy
>interpreted as liberating or as evidence of the 
>interconnectedness of everything) and a
>more pessimistic one (chance and indeterminacy interpreted as evidence of a
>predetermined destiny from which there is no 
>escape). On the other hand, in the last
>couple of decades European cinema has been 
>defining itself as ërealisticí by virtue of
>the particular kinds of stories it tells 
>(ëpost-Europeaní narratives of displacement
>told by exiles, expatriates, and migrants) 
>rather than by virtue of the particular film
>techniques it employs. There is a risk here of 
>blurring the distinction between
>ërealisticí cinema and ërepresentativeí cinema 
>(in the sense that there are certain
>things or identities that are in need of being 
>represented). If that happens, cinematic
>realism becomes implicitly identified with 
>intentional or willed self-marginalization
>and the ëexoticí subject--the most marginalized 
>subject--is transformed into the prime
>guarantor of the real. Not only is the marginal 
>invested with the potential to give us
>access to the real, but now it appears as though 
>the real itself is defined by its
>degree of unfamiliarity and otherness, in a 
>word, by its difference. The local, the
>concrete, the narrowly defined identity is 
>elevated into a criterion for reality in an
>often overcompensatory attempt to make up for 
>all past ëevilí grand narratives (the
>nation state, national identity, national cinema being the usual culprits).
>

*******************
The German Studies Call for Papers List
Editor: Stefani Engelstein
Assistant Editor:  Megan McKinstry
Sponsored by the University of Missouri
Info available at: http://www.missouri.edu/~graswww/resources/gerlistserv.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager