On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:59:00PM -0700, Peter Montgomery wrote:
> I'm with you, Marcia. I sense yet another conspiracy to downplay Eliot's
> contribution/importance to modern poetry.
A "conspiracy", no less? "The other side"? In Peter's apparent
paranoia, he as usual finds an argument where none really exists. Peter,
what is it of Nancy's quite sensible response, about this being a
semantic argument, that so sticks in your craw? Does the suggestion that
Eliot might have been assisted by "il miglior fabbro" offend the
apotheosis you would grant him?