I don't remember the context, but it seemed to me at the time
that there shouldn't have been an apostrophe at all. It was like the
George Carless wrote:
>>For the same reason it took the assorted listers several days recently to discern the difference between
>>"printer's" and "printers' " [as in marks (rather than MARX)].
>Actually, that's not true. The context was not given, and it wasn't clear whether "printer's" or
>"printers'" would have been correct.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/91 - Release Date: 9/6/2005