Sorry for the delay in responding; I attended Marcia's poetry reading at
Boston University. The large lecture hall was almost full to capacity;
Marcia was introduced by Christopher Ricks, Professor of Poetry at Oxford
University, and also a professor at BU. Marcia delighted the audience with
her intelligence, wit, and outstanding poetic talent; a great pleasure for
everyone lucky enough to be in attendance. Wow!!!
>From: Jennifer Formichelli <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: What Marcia was saying; was, Re: Off Topic: What people say
>Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 07:47:04 -0800
>That's not what was Marcia was saying, at least as I understood it. She
>was asking, I believe, why you want these individuals to _cloak_their
>prejudices by using neutral language? Not , I believe, whether others
>were offended by that language, but touching instead on what lies
>beneath it and properly in it.
>Is it somehow inoffensive to use language to disguise existing
>prejudices, whilst leaving those prejudices nestled comfortably in
>place (as we can see from political correctness, changing the diction
>does not change the mind's direction always, or not in the right ways,
>etc)? Is there not something dangerous and frightening about others not
>being able to see what is in the mind as well s the mouth (and being
>offended instead by that)?
>In any case, I would like to congratulate Marcia on her poetry reading
>last Friday. Was any local lister able to attend?
>On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, at 09:46 AM, Nancy Gish wrote:
>>* I do know. And I expect better of Gunnar, frankly.
>>* If one says nothing, one is in complicity. I feel everyone who is
>>offended by such language should say so--early and often.
>>>>>[log in to unmask] 11/03/04 10:07 AM >>>
>>Why ask Gunnar and Kate to use language to hide their prejudices?
>>you want to know who you are dealing with?