Peter Montgomery wrote:
>From: Nancy Gish
>Would not the meaning of "knowing Jesus" and hence "following after" him
>depend precisely on how one defined him? And so one might see Jesus
>as a human who represents how we are all the [children] of god and to
>"follow" would be something other than to believe in Christ's divinity.
>That is, is it not simply circular to say that to be a Christian is to
>know that Jesus is divine and so to believe in his divinity because
>that is to be Christian?
>I have no stake in the answer; I'm just curious about the seeming
>circularity that depends on having an answer in advance.
>straw manning it again Nancy?
>How convenient to be able to set up the bowling pins to your own
>preference, and then to walk away from it.
Enough, Peter. Why do you think your foolishly-written attacks on
Nancy are of any interest to others? I'm sick of you putting the rest
of us in the position of being a witness to your stupid and
self-inflated nastiness. It is because Will praised you that you are
annoyed that Nancy has joined the conversation?