[log in to unmask] wrote:
> One can debate the emphasis or degree of ambiguity intended, but the
> very thing that makes the "Streets" "like" the "tedious argument/Of
> insidious intent", as I read it, is the fact that they "lead you to
> an overwhelming question..."
Well, of course it is obvious that its both, now that you've pointed it
out that is. Thanks for the post Tom.