[log in to unmask] wrote:

> One can debate the emphasis or degree of ambiguity intended, but the
> very thing that makes the "Streets" "like" the "tedious argument/Of
> insidious intent", as I read it, is the fact that they "lead you to
> an overwhelming question..."

Well, of course it is obvious that its both, now that you've pointed it
out that is.  Thanks for the post Tom.

Regards,
    Rick Parker