Although all this sophisticated disputation is well above, beyond, and out
of my intellectual range--after all, I am just a semi-literate immigrant
from John Paul II's, Zbigniew Brzezinski's, Nicolas Copernicus', Lech
Walesa's, Adam Zagajewski's, and Czeslaw Milosz's "native realm"--I gladly
admit to REJOICING when I see that there are OTHER PEOPLE in this universe
who ALSO have a problem with the attitude exhibited by Nancy Gish--so
immersed in her sense of superiority vis-a-vis the rest and so free of any
sense of proportion vis-a-vis her definitive pronouncements on whatever
subject may conceivably come up--T or OT--
If these cascades of authoritative widom came from, say, Helen Vendler, or,
say, Cynthia Ozick, or, say, the late Diana Trilling, or, say, the equally
late Mary McCarthy, one would say, well, all is well in this, the best of
But Nancy Gish?
1920 S Street, N.W., Apt. 403
Washington DC 20009
hington DC 20009
202 483 7107
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: OT Rare Intelligent Voices on Poets Against the War
> Do you have a button that automatically lights up and screeches the
> minute you see my name? And do you think you might stick to issues for
> a change and stop snarling at me personally? It gets tiresome. Very.
> Ignoring does not seem to have any effect.
> Date sent: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:18:40 -0500
> Send reply to: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum."
<[log in to unmask]>
> From: Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: OT Rare Intelligent Voices on Poets Against
> To: [log in to unmask]
> If you took a moment and read the post, you would know it was posted by
> list member and is no more an ad than your own political posts. In light
> of which, your question to Peter--who would set the standards--is well
> At 08:12 PM 2/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >Much as I loathe the notion of monitoring, I would make an exception for
> >Earthrise Press, whoever they are. I do not like being subjected to ads
> >on a discussion list, let alone their propaganda.