Marcia Karp wrote:
> I wish Helen Vendler's response to one of the TSE Society papers
> (Gloucester) were in print. She spoke well, and, to me, convincingly in
> disagreement to a contention that TWL is a collaboration.
> I press our disagreement because it is basic to how we understand a
> poem to be written. That, in turn, bears on Timothy's post.
I tried to get the point across but I failed. I'm not going to bother again.
If explaining myself here is not beyond not capabilities it is beyond the
worth for this post. Why not go directly to responding to Tim's post?