LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


TSE@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  January 2003

TSE January 2003

Subject:

Review of Ricks on Eliot

From:

Carrol Cox <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

T. S. Eliot Discussion forum.

Date:

Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:57:11 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (145 lines)

Two Selections from the following review:

The New York Review of Books February 15, 1990 Review
Bleistein and Mr. Eliot By Michael Wood
T.S. Eliot and Prejudice by Christopher Ricks University of California
Press, 290 pp., $25.00

Against this we might argue, as Christopher Ricks does in his remarkable
book, that the senses of the word, even now and in English, are not
completely separate, and that it is easy to slip from one to the other.
Ricks recognizes the difference clearly enough by having a chapter
called "Prejudice" and another called "Anti-Semitism." The implication
is that prejudice is not always a horror; and that anti-Semitism is a
horror, and not merely a variety of prejudice or the only horror there
is.

But Rick's overall argument invites us to keep the different senses of
prejudice well within sight of each other, if only because of the
complacency skulking in the promise of a pure separation-the complacency
of thinking. We have benign assumptions, traditions, principles,
convictions; they have gruesome prejudices of the sort only entertained
by bigots. The point is not just that rational thought plays a very
small part in either of these ways of seeing things, but that both sets
submit the supposedly free mind to large historical forces.

Ricks is oddly silent about these forces, about the conditions in which
prejudices (in either sense) thrive or dwindle or change. What's in a
name? Prufrock, for example. "The tax returns of J. Alfred Prufrock,
fine, but a love song does not harmonize with the rotund name," which is
"not only formal but unspeakable: no one, not even the most pompous
self-regarder, could ever introduce himself as, or be addressed as, J.
Alfred Prufrock." No one? Well, only people like J. Edgar Hoover.

"I'm in love." "Who's the lucky man?" "J. Alfred Prufrock."
Inconceivable.

Ricks's commentary is wonderfully funny here and very alert to what
Eliot is up to. We have just seen how unlucky the lucky man thought he
was. But what kind of community is implied in these certainties about a
silly name? Genteel Boston in 1910 (or 1989)? Some sort of early- to
mid-century mandarin axis between the American East Coast and the
English Home Counties? I'm laughing along with Eliot and Ricks, and I
don't mean to get solemn about poor old Prufrock-he is fictional after
all, as a character in Woody Allen might say. But there is an
interesting historical question about when and where such laughter is or
isn't forthcoming-as of course there is about all implementations of
consensus. Still, a critic can't do everything, and perhaps Ricks needs
to suspend the general question in order to catch, as he so brilliantly
does, the soft, subtle shuffle of particular prejudices at work.

@@@@

Eliot's poems and plays, with few exceptions, do not promote Eliot's or
anyone's prejudices, but they often employ them.

I knew a man once did a girl in
Any man might do a girl in
Any man has to, needs to, wants to
Once in a lifetime, do a girl in.
Well he kept her there in a bath
With a gallon of lysol in a bath…
What did he do! what did he do?
That dont apply.
Talk to live men about what they do.
- "Sweeney Agonistes"

Any man claims our prejudiced assent, but doesn't really expect it
except on some strange wavelength where we (the men among us, and the
women willing to transpose the genders) may remember extreme fits of
anger or despair. Even then it's a long way from wants to to has to; and
the murderer himself has entered a form of death in life, where our
ordinary presumptions "don't apply." What is funny and frightening about
this passage is the way it parades prejudices, about women, violence,
action, death, without seeming to notice them. We ourselves are laughing
nervously because we think we may have spotted the prejudices-this is a
raw, stagy life we are looking at, a dark vaudeville-but are not at all
sure what to do about them. And of course a poem can triumph over
prejudice precisely by remembering it and placing it, as in the
equanimity of a promised death and transformation in a famous passage
(the example is Ricks's) in The Waste Land:

   Gentile or Jew
O you who turn the wheel and look to windward,
Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.

So let's not rush to see "Hakagawa, bowing among the Titians" (in
"Gerontion") as a bit of easy anti-Oriental prejudice on Eliot's part-at
least not without wondering about the ease of our own assumption that
Eliot is prejudiced, or without seeing that Hakagawa isn't "bowing
before his Titians," as Ransom rephrases it, or without remembering with
Ricks (a lovely bit of detective work) that the phrase "among the
Titians" comes from Henry James and describes Milly Theale in the
National Gallery in London.

Let's not be as sure as Stephen Spender is that "Fräulein von Kulp" (in
the same poem) is automatically meant to evoke a horrible night in an
Austrian hotel. Ricks wants us to see a "dual impulse" at work in
Eliot's poems, a "ministering to prejudice" that also alerts us to
prejudice; a use of prejudicial attitudes that converts rhetoric into
art and saves irony from its own complacency. It is the "double
enterprise of inciting both shrewd suspicion and a suspicion of such
shrewd suspicions." It resists both easy relativism and hardened
certainty.

Eliot's strategy can catch us out in really uncomfortable (and then
liberating) ways, and Ricks himself has developed a critical equivalent
for it. I thought I knew where I was, for example, when I saw Ricks
confronting, quite early in his book, the notorious anti-Semitic
snatches in Eliot's poems: the squatting Jew in "Gerontion," Rachel née
Rabinovitch in "Sweeney Among the Nightingales," the sagging Bleistein
in "Burbank with a Baedeker: Bleistein with a Cigar."

Ricks shows that the lines in "Gerontion" belong to the cracked and
angry speaker, not to the poet-they are among the "thoughts of a dry
brain" I glanced at earlier-and that Rachel's name is given to us in
very strange form, which doesn't tell us she has changed it to something
elegantly gentile (like Winthrop or Lowell or Eliot, Ricks suggests).
This, I thought, was beginning to look like academic whitewash: it
wasn't the poet, guv, it was the people and the language in the poems.
Beautifully done, and more than half-right, but whitewash all the same.
But then this supposed perception of mine turned out to be mere
prejudice, judgment leaping ahead of the text, since Ricks's discussion
of the third instance, the Bleistein poem quoted earlier, offers no
quarter and no defense:

A lustreless protrusive eye
  Stares from the protozoic slime
At a perspective of Canaletto…

  The rats are underneath the piles.
The jew is underneath the lot.

This is not a miming of prejudice, it is the thing itself, the voice of
a culture enjoying its bigotry, delighting in dumping the familiar
blame. Bleistein eyeing the Canaletto cityscape is squalid and nasty
where Hakagawa among the Titians is merely funny and exotic. Of course,
the poem is hideously clever. Ricks says it is "irresponsibly cunning,"
the instance "quite differently objectionable" from the way the other
two are. They are objectionable as well, of course; there was no
whitewash. Ricks is not out to justify Eliot but to read him as closely
and as fairly as can be done. And if this activity cannot purge reading
of prejudice, it can help us to face whatever prejudices arise, from
whatever direction. It is because we can't read things absolutely right
that we must read them carefully; it is because prejudice won't just
vanish that we need to hold what prejudices we can to the light.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager