John Ryskamp wrote:
>
> That incredibly important history of Freudian psychology by
> Macmillan.  You can have an orientation toward Eliot which is that of
> 1913, or you can have an orientation toward Eliot which is that of
> 2002.  Guess which one Eliot would have you have, if he were alive
> today?  Le docteur Nosferatu est mort, dit le docteur Jeckel.
>

Freudian psychology has been fundamentally undermined long ago. Why is
this particular history of it important?

My "orientation" towards Eliot or anyone else has never been influenced
by psychoanalysis, or any other theory of mystical entities such as "The
Unconscious." Of course psychoanalysis is also a historical fact, like
neoclassical economics, phrenology, and other mythologies of the 19th
and 20th centuries.

Carrol