No I am not saying it sets itself up as anything. You said it was a circular
argument; I said it was not an argument at all.
Date sent: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:14:17 -0400
Send reply to: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
From: Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Who's who
To: [log in to unmask]
At 03:49 PM 10/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>What suggests it is an argument at all? It does not set itself up to be
>logical or not circular.
You imply that it does set itself up to be something. What?