First of all, thank you for the information. I didn't even know there was an
erratum to Paradise Lost.
Second, what do you make of it?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcia Karp" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
I think your point about variation showing only against regularity is a good
I wonder what you make of the erratum for the first edition of PL-"Lib. 2.
for we read wee." Why do you limit the function his spellings might have
to _symbolism_ (in scare quotes, yet)?