Erwin Welsch wrote:
> Rainey also suggests that Eliot was duplicitous in seeking various, and
> sometimes conflicting, publishing outlets during 1922. But that is
> another topic entirely.
Then Ken Armstrong wrote:
> Cheap thrills, Mr. Welsch? Lucky for us Rainey is "a cautious writer."
A second chance here.
Would you really rather say "Rainey also suggests that Eliot was
duplicitous" or that the facts of the dealings suggest that Eliot was
duplicitous? Or is there some other wording that you think would be