|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1994D.C78072A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re: Bad mannersI imagine no one is much interested in discussing my sex =
life, but I want to add one thing -- had I known this was going to the =
list (and no, Gunnar, I don't mind), I would have phrased it to avoid =
the "hey, I'm not gay" flavor. I know some people are offended by that, =
and I can see why. Somehow -- I can't say why -- it seemed more =
appropriate in a one-to-one communication.
Tom K
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Thomas Kissane=20
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: Bad manners
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Gunnar Jauch=20
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Bad manners
Dear Rick,=20
here's a funny Tom K offline remark (hope you don't mind my making =
it public, old chap):
Something Rick Seddon wrote caught my eye:
<<That Gunnar and Tom like each other and know T. S. Eliot extremely =
well.=20
That Steve and Rick P are both convinced that TSE was gay (just =
joking, just joking).>>
I appreciate Rick S's kudos. I wonder, though, if this =
juxtaposition might drag us into an analysis by Rick P's great-grandson, =
in his thesis on "Sexual Orientation of TS Eliot List Members at the =
Turn of the Last Century."
If he's content with evidence such as appears in "Painted Shadow," =
he could create a tale that would shock our wives in their dottering, =
aged-140+ retirements.
What a sneaky way to point out that we're married, eh?
It don't mean a thing!
Remember what Woody Allen said about the merits of being bisexual: =
You double your chances for a date on Saturday night.
Cheers,
Gunnar
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1994D.C78072A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: Bad manners</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4616.200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffe0b8>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I imagine no one is much interested in =
discussing=20
my sex life, but I want to add one thing -- had I known this was going =
to the=20
list (and no, Gunnar, I don't mind), I would have phrased it to avoid =
the "hey,=20
I'm not gay" flavor. I know some people are offended by that, and =
I can=20
see why. Somehow -- I can't say why -- it seemed more =
appropriate in=20
a one-to-one communication.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom K</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A [log in to unmask] =
href=3D"mailto:[log in to unmask]">Thomas=20
Kissane</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
[log in to unmask]
href=3D"mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, January 09, =
2002 8:18=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Bad manners</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A [log in to unmask]
href=3D"mailto:[log in to unmask]">Gunnar Jauch</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
[log in to unmask]
href=3D"mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, January 09, =
2002 5:50=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Bad =
manners</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>Dear Rick, <BR><BR>here's a funny Tom K offline =
remark=20
(hope you don't mind my making it public, old =
chap):<BR><BR><TT>Something=20
Rick Seddon wrote caught my eye:<BR><BR><<That Gunnar and Tom =
like=20
each other and know T. S. Eliot extremely well. <BR>That Steve and =
Rick P=20
are both convinced that TSE was gay (just joking, just=20
joking).>><BR><BR>I appreciate Rick S's kudos. I wonder, =
though,=20
if this juxtaposition might drag us into an analysis by Rick P's=20
great-grandson, in his thesis on "Sexual Orientation of TS Eliot =
List=20
Members at the Turn of the Last Century."<BR>If he's content with =
evidence=20
such as appears in "Painted Shadow," he could create a tale that =
would=20
shock our wives in their dottering, aged-140+=20
retirements.<BR><BR><BR></TT>What a sneaky way to point out that =
we're=20
married, eh?<BR>It don't mean a thing!<BR>Remember what Woody =
Allen=20
said about the merits of being bisexual: You double your chances for =
a date=20
on Saturday=20
=
night.<BR><TT><BR></TT>Cheers,<BR><BR><BR>Gunnar<TT><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BL=
OCKQUOTE></TT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1994D.C78072A0--
|
