This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1461C.AE084250
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Is that Freud the person or Freud the psychoanalyst you think he didn't
like?
A.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]Namens [log in to unmask]
Verzonden: dinsdag 25 september 2001 23:24
Aan: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: psychiatrist or psychoanalyst?
In a message dated 9/25/01 4:45:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Check this out:
"Alec Guinness Discusses His Role in Play By T. S. Eliot"
By Maurice Zolotow
February 26, 1950
http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/08/24/reviews/guinness-party.html
Regards,
Rick Parker
Interesting article. But Zolotow doesn't distinguish between a
psychoanalyst and a psychiatrist, and uses the words interchangeably. I'd
forgotten, though, about the couch, which I think nobody used except
Freudian psychoanalysts. But I think Nancy's right too about his having
religious components. One comment that's been made for a long time about
Freudian psychoanalysis is that it sounds more like a religion than a
science.
Sir Henry seems to me like a very sympathetic figure in the play, which is
surprising because Eliot didn't care much for Freud.
pat
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1461C.AE084250
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D714494821-25092001>Is=20
that Freud the person or Freud the psychoanalyst you think he didn't=20
like?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D714494821-25092001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D714494821-25092001>A.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px">
<DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----<BR><B>Van:</B>=20
[log in to unmask] =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]<B>Namens=20
</B>[log in to unmask]<BR><B>Verzonden:</B> dinsdag 25 september 2001=20
23:24<BR><B>Aan:</B> [log in to unmask]<BR><B>Onderwerp:</B> Re:=20
psychiatrist or psychoanalyst?<BR><BR></DIV></FONT><FONT=20
face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT face=3D"Arial Narrow" lang=3D0 size=3D3=20
FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><B>In a message dated 9/25/01 4:45:30 PM Eastern =
Daylight=20
Time, [log in to unmask] writes: <BR><BR></FONT><FONT =
color=3D#000000=20
face=3DArial lang=3D0 size=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"></B><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"=20
TYPE=3D"CITE">Check this out: <BR><BR> "Alec Guinness =
Discusses His Role in Play By T. S. Eliot" <BR> By =
Maurice=20
Zolotow <BR> February 26, 1950=20
=
<BR> http://www.nytimes.com/book=
s/97/08/24/reviews/guinness-party.html=20
<BR><BR>Regards, <BR> Rick Parker <BR></FONT><FONT =
color=3D#000000=20
face=3DArial lang=3D0 size=3D3 =
FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Interesting=20
article. But Zolotow doesn't distinguish between a psychoanalyst and a =
psychiatrist, and uses the words interchangeably. I'd forgotten, =
though, about=20
the couch, which I think nobody used except Freudian psychoanalysts. =
But I=20
think Nancy's right too about his having religious components. One =
comment=20
that's been made for a long time about Freudian psychoanalysis is that =
it=20
sounds more like a religion than a science. <BR><BR>Sir Henry seems to =
me like=20
a very sympathetic figure in the play, which is surprising because =
Eliot=20
didn't care much for Freud. <BR><BR>pat=20
</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C1461C.AE084250--
|
