Kate Troy wrote:

> I still say that the third was the questor.

Kate,

I can suspect that you are really swamped with things at the moment but when
you have some time would you answer some questions I have about you questor
statement.

Where do we "look" to "see" the questor in another quise anywhere else in
the poem?

Can we "count on" this questor to be able to ask the right question?

Why is this questor so darn hard to see in this section?

Who are the other two?

Regards,
   Rick Parker