LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


TSE@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  March 2001

TSE March 2001

Subject:

Re: The Uranian confusion

From:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 4 Mar 2001 04:13:40 EST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (508 lines)


--part1_74.847169c.27d36144_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steve,

I did look at the entire poem. I should have caught on long ago that we have
a couple of poets talking about poetry. Not the biggest surprise in the
world, as this poem came up in relation to TWL and Pound's editing of TWL.

1) Pound is a good poet, and he can't stop thinking like a poet even when
he's horsing around. So he's got a structure built into his crappy little
piece of doggerel--essentially, he's developing a contrast. Notice that he
starts with the Uranian muse, the patroness of all that's lofty and even
(according to Wicksteed) heavenly. Then he jumps to the other extreme, to the
low kind of rhetoric that teenagers like to call "talking dirty." If this
spanning of extremes doesn't remind you of Dante, maybe you don't realize
that this is one of the most striking things about the Commedia, and that
it's often brought out in the lit. Dante spans the whole gamut, from scenes
of exquisite beauty to all those stinking marshes and worse. Scenes so
disgusting they could make you vomit. Sinners condemned to live in a river of
shit, and lurid descripitons of how they're beaten off when they try to climb
into the boat. Others with their guts hanging out...it just goes on an on. So
it was Pound's implying the whole range of images--highest to lowest--that
seemed Dantean, or that reminded me of how the Commedia is often summarized.
You didn't notice because maybe you don't realize that there is this aspect
with Dante.

2) The rest of your argument, basically, is that obscenity, foul language,
and allusions to defecation, body parts, homoeroticism, don't seem you to
have anything to do with Dante. Or you don't think Dante would include any
of these things in the Commedia. But you're wrong in this case. He includes
them all. As I mentioned previously, there's been a large number of articles
in recent years about Dante's homosexuals, and if you're interested you can
look them up in the Dante Society of America bibliographies. I don't know why
so many people have the erroneous idea that ancient and medieval literature
is all prissy and sanitized. It just isn't, and Dante isn't.

3) If you check the OED, you'll find that "strapping" was originally applied
to young women, and now can be applied to either sex. So there's no
foundation for your claim that the word would never be applied to a woman.
Medieval lit is full of strapping wenches. So is Shakespeare. And endless
bawdy stories, in blow by blow detail, about what happened when the master of
the house took a fancy to the "strapping servant girl."

4) It seems to me that instead of asking yourself what the poem is about,
you're asking yourself how you can prove it's about homosexuality. And you've
made up your mind in advance that you won't settle for just a few possible
overtones of homosexuality. You want it to be predominantly or entirely about
homosexuality, so overwhelmingly that anything else about it just isn't worth
mentioning. I honestly don't understand the reasoning (maybe you'll
explain?), or the reluctance to let the poem be what it is--maybe about
homosexuality, maybe not, and in either case almost certainly about a lot of
other things as well.

It's true there's a minor literary genre produced largely for gay men by gay
men that's in this very narrow track you're looking for--nothing but "who I
went to bed with last, how I felt about it, what we did while we were there,
and why this was the great love of my life." It doesn't command a very wide
audience, maybe because of the True Confessions Magazine ambiance. If you
check out writing by gay men of somewhat more quality or more literary
stature--say, James Baldwin or Edward Albee--you'll almost invariably find
that they write about a large number of things--their writing isn't limited
to "what he did next when I turned him over, and how I felt about it three
weeks later." I don't happen to give a hoot if Eliot was gay or not, but
let's give him credit for being at least as complex as Baldwin or Albee.
Let's try to avoid forcing either Eliot or Pound into that very narrow track
where neither of them really fits in any case. And I wonder, in this case
with Pound, if you aren't grasping at straws.
 
  And the holy hosts of hellenists
  Have numbed and honied his cervic cysts,

It sounds like a crude reference to
male homosexual anal intercourse.

Maybe you need to add something to your statement, or qualify it in some way.
The cervix is the neck of the womb. Men don't have cervixes, so can't use
them in "male homosexual anal intercourse."

  And then there are the passages we discussed last year, such as:

  His verse omits realities,
  Angelic hands with mother of pearl
  Retouch the strapping servant girl,

....It sounds to me like Pound is
saying Eliot "omitted realities" in TWL and that omission had something to do
with "retouching" the image of a "strapping servant girl" (as a photographer
retouches a painting, to change something). "Strapping" is a term usually
applied to a big man, isn't it? (i.e., that term is not usually applied to a
girl). And the "mother of pearl" phrase -- doesn't that remind you of the TWL
line "Those are pearls that were HIS eyes"?

On strapping, see above. It's a fairly common literary idea that life is not
art---that the artist has to retouch it to make it art. So a strapping
servant girl who might not be very interesting in real life can be made to
seem interesting in art. So it sounds to me like a poet might be talking
about the process of making a poem.

I think it was noticed early on that TWL is pretty hard to brush off as just
a poem "about homosexuality." It's loaded with lovers of all kinds, and
allusions to famous lovers, all of whom are male-female pairs. Hence the
somewhat bizarre idea that if we assumed some of the women "are really
supposed to be men," then maybe the theory could be rescued. Since we've
determined this curious idea was actually started by Knight, and nobody has
the foggiest idea of what Knight said or what his reasoning is, maybe we need
the Knight article.


   Then there are the cruder parts of "Sage Homme". "Grudge not the oyster
his stiff saliva". Is that a Dante allusion also? My guess is that it means
"Don't condemn the poet over the source of his sexual energy ('stiff saliva'
-- ejaculate) -- it's what allowed the oyster (Eliot) to produce his pearl
(TWL)."

"Grudge not" is an imperative, and I assume it's being addressed to Eliot,
because the entire poem is addressed to Eliot. Maybe he's being told not to
envy oysters their simple sexual pleasures. But you'v e lost me on why you
think poets should be equated with oysters. What points do you see poets and
oysters having in common? Your next step has me even more baffled. If you
want poets to be oysters, why is an oyster (Eliot) being told not to envy
oysters? Doesn't make any sense. Or there's something you've forgotten to
explain.

pat

========================================================================

In a message dated 3/3/01 10:42:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Subj:Re: The Uranian confusion
> Date:3/3/01 10:42:07 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Sender: [log in to unmask]
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</A>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/3/01 9:51:14 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > Now we have to deal with two subtexts
> > or possible subtexts.
> >
> > 1) Did Pound know that the Uranian muse
> > was Dante's muse--that Dante invokes
> > the Uranian muse in the Commedia? . . .
> >
> > So, yes, I think it's possible that Pound
> > also meant to compliment his "Dantescan"
> > friend by telling him that the muse for TWL
> > must have been Dante's muse.
> > . . .
> > 2) Now the second subtext or possible
> > subtext. Is Pound kidding Eliot for
> > being gay, or because he rightly
> > or wrong believes Eliot to be gay?
>
> I understand you are currently looking at the opening lines of "Sage
> Homme",
> and that's a good place to start:
>
> These are the poems of Eliot
> By the Uranian Muse begot;
>
> But the poem continues from there. There are lines like:
>
> And the holy hosts of hellenists
> Have numbed and honied his cervic cysts,
>
> I don't think THAT'S a tribute to Dante. It sounds like a crude reference
> to
> male homosexual anal intercourse.
>
> And then there are the passages we discussed last year, such as:
>
> His verse omits realities,
> Angelic hands with mother of pearl
> Retouch the strapping servant girl,
>
> which also don't sound like Dante allusions. It sounds to me like Pound is
> saying Eliot "omitted realities" in TWL and that omission had something to
> do
> with "retouching" the image of a "strapping servant girl" (as a
> photographer
> retouches a painting, to change something). "Strapping" is a term usually
> applied to a big man, isn't it? (i.e., that term is not usually applied to
> a
> girl). And the "mother of pearl" phrase -- doesn't that remind you of the
> TWL
> line "Those are pearls that were HIS eyes"?
>
> Then there are the cruder parts of "Sage Homme". "Grudge not the oyster
> his stiff saliva". Is that a Dante allusion also? My guess is that it means
> "Don't condemn the poet over the source of his sexual energy ('stiff
> saliva'
> -- ejaculate) -- it's what allowed the oyster (Eliot) to produce his pearl
> (TWL)."
>
> And while we're on "crude", let's not forget: "Vates cum fistula" (poet
> with anal fistula).
>
>
> What I'm saying is that, when "Sage Homme" is taken in its entirety, I
> find
> it difficult to see it as a Dante reference, even if one isolated line can
> have a double meaning. It seems to me to be a sustained joke from Pound to
> Eliot and the joke is that Eliot is gay. Whether the joke is true or not
> cannot be determined from "Sage Homme".
>
> -- Steve --
>
>
>
> ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
> Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
> Received: from rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (rly-yd03.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.3])
> by air-yd01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 22:42:07
> -0500
> Received: from po.missouri.edu (po.missouri.edu [128.206.12.137]) by
> rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 22:41:38 -0500
> Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by po.missouri.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA08452;
> Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:41:37 -0600
> Received: from imo-r14.mx.aol.com (imo-r14.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.68])
> by po.missouri.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08394
> for <[log in to unmask]>; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:41:05 -0600
> Received: from [log in to unmask]
> by imo-r14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id 7.d7.311ba1e (4155)
> for <[log in to unmask]>; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 22:40:29 -0500 (EST)
> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 22:40:29 EST
> Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> Sender: [log in to unmask]
> Precedence: bulk
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: The Uranian confusion
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 33
> X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>
>
>



--part1_74.847169c.27d36144_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>Steve,
<BR>
<BR>I did look at the entire poem. I should have caught on long ago that we have
<BR>a couple of poets talking about poetry. Not the biggest surprise in the
<BR>world, as this poem came up in relation to TWL and Pound's editing of TWL.
<BR>
<BR>1) Pound is a good poet, and he can't stop thinking like a poet even when
<BR>he's horsing around. So he's got a structure built into his crappy little
<BR>piece of doggerel--essentially, he's developing a contrast. Notice that he
<BR>starts with the Uranian muse, the patroness of all that's lofty and even
<BR>(according to Wicksteed) heavenly. Then he jumps to the other extreme, to the
<BR>low kind of rhetoric that teenagers like to call "talking dirty." &nbsp;If this
<BR>spanning of extremes doesn't remind you of Dante, maybe you don't realize
<BR>that this is one of the most striking things about the Commedia, and that
<BR>it's often brought out in the lit. Dante spans the whole gamut, from scenes
<BR>of exquisite beauty to all those stinking marshes and worse. Scenes so
<BR>disgusting they could make you vomit. Sinners condemned to live in a river of
<BR>shit, and lurid descripitons of how they're beaten off when they try to climb
<BR>into the boat. Others with their guts hanging out...it just goes on an on. So
<BR>it was Pound's implying the whole range of images--highest to lowest--that
<BR>seemed Dantean, or that reminded me of how the Commedia is often summarized.
<BR>You didn't notice because maybe you don't realize that there is this aspect
<BR>with Dante.
<BR>
<BR>2) The rest of your argument, basically, is that obscenity, foul language,
<BR>and allusions to defecation, body parts, homoeroticism, don't seem you to
<BR>have anything to do with Dante. &nbsp;Or you don't think Dante would include any
<BR>of these things in the Commedia. But you're wrong in this case. He includes
<BR>them all. As I mentioned previously, there's been a large number of articles
<BR>in recent years about Dante's homosexuals, and if you're interested you can
<BR>look them up in the Dante Society of America bibliographies. I don't know why
<BR>so many people have the erroneous idea &nbsp;that ancient and medieval literature
<BR>is all prissy and sanitized. It just isn't, and Dante isn't.
<BR>
<BR>3) If you check the OED, you'll find that "strapping" was originally applied
<BR>to young women, and now can be applied to either sex. So there's no
<BR>foundation for your claim that the word would never be applied to a woman.
<BR>Medieval lit is full of strapping wenches. So is Shakespeare. And endless
<BR>bawdy stories, in blow by blow detail, about what happened when the master of
<BR>the house took a fancy to the "strapping servant girl."
<BR>
<BR>4) It seems to me that instead of asking yourself what the poem is about,
<BR>you're asking yourself how you can prove it's about homosexuality. And you've
<BR>made up your mind in advance that you won't settle for just a few possible
<BR>overtones of homosexuality. You want it to be predominantly or entirely about
<BR>homosexuality, so overwhelmingly that anything else about it just isn't worth
<BR>mentioning. &nbsp;I honestly don't understand the reasoning (maybe you'll
<BR>explain?), or the reluctance to let the poem be what it is--maybe about
<BR>homosexuality, maybe not, and in either case almost certainly about a lot of
<BR>other things as well.
<BR>
<BR>It's true there's a minor literary genre produced largely for gay men by gay
<BR>men that's in this very narrow track you're looking for--nothing but "who I
<BR>went to bed with last, how I felt about it, &nbsp;what we did while we were there,
<BR>and why this was the great love of my life." It doesn't command a very wide
<BR>audience, maybe because of the True Confessions Magazine ambiance. If you
<BR>check out writing by gay men of somewhat more quality or more literary
<BR>stature--say, James Baldwin or Edward Albee--you'll almost invariably find
<BR>that they write about a large number of things--their writing isn't limited
<BR>to "what he did next when I turned him over, and how I felt about it three
<BR>weeks later." &nbsp;I don't happen to give a hoot if Eliot was gay or not, but
<BR>let's give him credit for being at least as complex as Baldwin or Albee.
<BR>Let's try to avoid forcing either Eliot or Pound into that very narrow track
<BR>where neither of them really fits in any case. And I wonder, in this case
<BR>with Pound, if you aren't grasping at straws.
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B> &nbsp;And the holy hosts of hellenists
<BR> &nbsp;Have numbed and honied his cervic cysts,
<BR>
<BR>It sounds like a crude reference to
<BR>male homosexual anal intercourse.
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>Maybe you need to add something to your statement, or qualify it in some way.
<BR>The cervix is the neck of the womb. Men don't have cervixes, so can't use
<BR>them in "male homosexual anal intercourse."</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B>
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;And then there are the passages we discussed last year, such as:
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;His verse omits realities,
<BR> &nbsp;Angelic hands with mother of pearl
<BR> &nbsp;Retouch the strapping servant girl,
<BR>
<BR>...It sounds to me like Pound is
<BR>saying Eliot "omitted realities" in TWL and that omission had something to do
<BR>with "retouching" the image of a "strapping servant girl" (as a photographer
<BR>retouches a painting, to change something). "Strapping" is a term usually
<BR>applied to a big man, isn't it? (i.e., that term is not usually applied to a
<BR>girl). And the "mother of pearl" phrase -- doesn't that remind you of the TWL
<BR>line "Those are pearls that were HIS eyes"?
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>On strapping, see above. It's a fairly common literary idea that life is not
<BR>art---that the artist has to retouch it to make it art. So a strapping
<BR>servant girl who might not be very interesting in real life can be made to
<BR>seem interesting in art. So it sounds to me like a poet might be talking
<BR>about the process of making a poem.
<BR>
<BR>I think it was noticed early on that TWL is pretty hard to brush off &nbsp;as just
<BR>a poem "about homosexuality." It's loaded with lovers of all kinds, and
<BR>allusions to famous lovers, all of whom are male-female pairs. Hence the
<BR>somewhat bizarre idea that if we assumed some of the women "are really
<BR>supposed to be men," then maybe the theory could be rescued. Since we've
<BR>determined this curious idea was actually started by Knight, and nobody has
<BR>the foggiest idea of what Knight said or what his reasoning is, maybe we need
<BR>the Knight article.
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B>
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;Then there are the cruder parts of "Sage Homme". "Grudge not the oyster
<BR>his stiff saliva". Is that a Dante allusion also? My guess is that it means
<BR>"Don't condemn the poet over the source of his sexual energy ('stiff saliva'
<BR>-- ejaculate) -- it's what allowed the oyster (Eliot) to produce his pearl
<BR>(TWL)."
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>"Grudge not" is an imperative, and I assume it's being addressed to Eliot,
<BR>because the entire poem is addressed to Eliot. Maybe he's &nbsp;being told not to
<BR>envy oysters their simple sexual pleasures. But you'v e lost me on why you
<BR>think poets should be equated with oysters. What points do you see poets and
<BR>oysters having in common? Your next step has me even more baffled. If you
<BR>want poets to be oysters, why is an oyster (Eliot) being told not to envy
<BR>oysters? Doesn't make any sense. Or there's something you've forgotten to
<BR>explain.
<BR>
<BR>pat
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B>
<BR>========================================================================
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>
<BR>In a message dated 3/3/01 10:42:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
<BR>[log in to unmask] writes:
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: The Uranian confusion</B>
<BR>Date:3/3/01 10:42:07 PM Eastern Standard Time
<BR>From: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[log in to unmask]
<BR>Sender: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[log in to unmask]
<BR>Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</A>
<BR>To: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[log in to unmask]
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>In a message dated 3/3/01 9:51:14 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
<BR>
<BR>&gt; Now we have to deal with two subtexts
<BR>&gt; or possible subtexts.
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;1) &nbsp;Did Pound know that the Uranian muse
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;was Dante's muse--that Dante invokes
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;the Uranian muse in the Commedia? . . .
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;So, yes, I think it's possible that Pound
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;also meant to compliment his "Dantescan"
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;friend by telling him that the muse for TWL
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;must have been Dante's muse.
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;. . .
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;2) Now the second subtext or possible
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;subtext. Is Pound kidding Eliot for
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;being gay, or because he rightly
<BR>&gt; &nbsp;or wrong believes Eliot to be gay?
<BR>
<BR>I understand you are currently looking at the opening lines of "Sage
<BR>Homme",
<BR>and that's a good place to start:
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;These are the poems of Eliot
<BR> &nbsp;By the Uranian Muse begot;
<BR>
<BR>But the poem continues from there. There are lines like:
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;And the holy hosts of hellenists
<BR> &nbsp;Have numbed and honied his cervic cysts,
<BR>
<BR>I don't think THAT'S a tribute to Dante. It sounds like a crude reference
<BR>to
<BR>male homosexual anal intercourse.
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;And then there are the passages we discussed last year, such as:
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;His verse omits realities,
<BR> &nbsp;Angelic hands with mother of pearl
<BR> &nbsp;Retouch the strapping servant girl,
<BR>
<BR>which also don't sound like Dante allusions. It sounds to me like Pound is
<BR>saying Eliot "omitted realities" in TWL and that omission had something to
<BR>do
<BR>with "retouching" the image of a "strapping servant girl" (as a
<BR>photographer
<BR>retouches a painting, to change something). "Strapping" is a term usually
<BR>applied to a big man, isn't it? (i.e., that term is not usually applied to
<BR>a
<BR>girl). And the "mother of pearl" phrase -- doesn't that remind you of the
<BR>TWL
<BR>line "Those are pearls that were HIS eyes"?
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;Then there are the cruder parts of "Sage Homme". "Grudge not the oyster
<BR>his stiff saliva". Is that a Dante allusion also? My guess is that it means
<BR>"Don't condemn the poet over the source of his sexual energy ('stiff
<BR>saliva'
<BR>-- ejaculate) -- it's what allowed the oyster (Eliot) to produce his pearl
<BR>(TWL)."
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;And while we're on "crude", let's not forget: "Vates cum fistula" (poet
<BR>with anal fistula).
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> &nbsp;What I'm saying is that, when "Sage Homme" is taken in its entirety, I
<BR>find
<BR>it difficult to see it as a Dante reference, even if one isolated line can
<BR>have a double meaning. It seems to me to be a sustained joke from Pound to
<BR>Eliot and the joke is that Eliot is gay. Whether the joke is true or not
<BR>cannot be determined from "Sage Homme".
<BR>
<BR>-- Steve --
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#0f0f0f" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>
<BR>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
<BR>Return-Path: &lt;[log in to unmask]&gt;
<BR>Received: from &nbsp;rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (rly-yd03.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.3])
<BR>by air-yd01.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 22:42:07
<BR>-0500
<BR>Received: from &nbsp;po.missouri.edu (po.missouri.edu [128.206.12.137]) by
<BR>rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 22:41:38 -0500
<BR>Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;by po.missouri.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA08452;
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:41:37 -0600
<BR>Received: from imo-r14.mx.aol.com (imo-r14.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.68])
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;by po.missouri.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08394
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;for &lt;[log in to unmask]&gt;; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:41:05 -0600
<BR>Received: from [log in to unmask]
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;by imo-r14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id 7.d7.311ba1e (4155)
<BR> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;for &lt;[log in to unmask]&gt;; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 22:40:29 -0500 (EST)
<BR>Message-Id: &lt;[log in to unmask]&gt;
<BR>Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 22:40:29 EST
<BR>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
<BR>Sender: [log in to unmask]
<BR>Precedence: bulk
<BR>From: [log in to unmask]
<BR>To: [log in to unmask]
<BR>Subject: Re: The Uranian confusion
<BR>MIME-Version: 1.0
<BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
<BR>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 33
<BR>X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
<BR>
<BR>
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial Narrow" LANG="0"><B>
<BR></B></FONT></HTML>

--part1_74.847169c.27d36144_boundary--

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager