> I might place it further in the context of TSE and not OFF TOPIC by
> referring anyone interested to Eliot's 1919 review of G. Gregory Smith's
> book, _Scottish Literature: Character and Influence_. Eliot addressed
the
> question, "Was There a Scottish Literature?" and concluded that the
> answer was "no"--on grounds of language. Eliot clearly did not know the
> history of the Scots language, but let that go. Naturally MacDiarmid
> disagreed. I have written about, it if anyone wants to read it, in my
> contribution to _Hugh MacDiarmid: The Man and His Work_." I note this
> only to point out that the specific cultural question is directly an Eliot
> question, one I think would be interesting to discuss.
> Nancy
Do you have a reference for Eliot's review? I'd like to check it out. Thanks
for referring to your own work as well - I'll try to get hold of a copy of
that too.
My other post about the role of the Scottish aristocracy in the clearances
was only a way of emphasizing a distinction that was already implicit in
your posts. In this discussion you've always seemed to me to avoid the trap
of a sweeping, unreconstructed 'Scottishism'. I was just pointing out that
that charge wouldn't stick.
Yours,
Raphael Ingelbien
[log in to unmask]
|