LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


TSE@PO.MISSOURI.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

TSE  March 2001

TSE March 2001

Subject:

Re: OT -- Oppression (was, Dans, etc.)

From:

"Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:01:27 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (98 lines)

Dear Tom,

Thank you very much for defining exactly what I was saying and for placing 
it in the context of ethics.

I might place it further in the context of TSE and not OFF TOPIC by 
referring anyone interested to Eliot's 1919 review of G. Gregory Smith's 
book, _Scottish Literature:  Character and Influence_.  Eliot addressed the 
question, "Was There a Scottish Literature?" and concluded that the 
answer was "no"--on grounds of language.  Eliot clearly did not know the 
history of the Scots language, but let that go.  Naturally MacDiarmid 
disagreed.  I have written about, it if anyone wants to read it, in my 
contribution to _Hugh MacDiarmid:  The Man and His Work_."  I note this 
only to point out that the specific cultural question is directly an Eliot 
question, one I think would be interesting to discuss.
Nancy






Date sent:      	Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:38:50 EST
Send reply to:  	[log in to unmask]
From:           	[log in to unmask]
To:             	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:        	Re: OT -- Oppression (was, Dans, etc.)

I've just cited enough of Nancy's earlier post to conjure it up; I'm sure
y'all recall it.

I'm writing to comment on the oddity, to me,  of the response to what
Nancy has written.  

One could certainly complain that this sort of discussion of historical
grievences is inappropriate on the TSE list, or should be marked "OT".  I
would probably agree with the latter, at least.  But this does not appear
to be what is bothering people about what Nancy wrote.

One could, and should, object strenuously if Nancy wrote things that were
materially inaccurate, but no one has alleged this; at least, it isn't at
the heart of the objections I've read.

One could chasten Nancy if she implied that World Scottishism should 
unite
in arms to crush the interests of the Anglo Saxon oppressor.  However,
despite charges that she is unwilling to forgive, her post appears neutral
on forgiveness -- its essence is to oppose forgetfulness.

Now, what is wrong with reciting historical facts, and contending that
they should be known?  There can be no serious question that the
expansionist and imperial tendencies of the English nation, as it grew to
Great Britain, had terrible consequences for many people, and that this
has been an important part of world history over the past 500 years (and
regional history far longer.)  The consequences were felt most immediately
by those in the neighborhood; thereafter, by colonialized third world
peoples who suffered at the hands of both English expansionists, and of
the displaced Celts who fled to new lands to escape oppression (by moving
from oppressee to oppressor), or were sent there as formal or informal
agents of colonial government.

On the one hand, this is not remarkable.  The Romans felt the pinch when
Goths were driven west by Huns, all part of a complex chain of conflict
wherein most everybody plays the victim and oppressor, in turn.  History
is a slaughterbench.

I would submit that, the fact that such violence is a fundamental aspect
of history is a reason for us to remember, rather than a reason for us to
dismiss, these developments.  And, for purposes of keeping our historical
vision clear, it is important that the grievences now most prominent in
the public mind -- such as the Holocaust, the Gulag, the U.S. slave trade,
the genocide of Native Americans -- be both fully and frequently
discussed, and placed in the context of these other events.  None of the
horrors of these unique events are diminished by context; a fuller
understanding of the whole pattern of historical inhumanity (or what we
like to call inhumanity) is better disclosed.

So why object to the particular example that Nancy has advanced, unless
one believes that discsussion of all historical greivences should be
discouraged?  Why carve out this one?  I don't get it.

To tie in a poetic angle, I suggest a reading of Yeats, specifically, Part
I (I think; maybe II, I don't have it here) from "Three Marching Songs." 
It addresses the subject of how and if we ought to remember such things,
and does so with apparent ambivalence but ultimate resolution.

Tom K



In a message dated 3/21/01 6:51:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,   
[log in to unmask] writes:  


This is to Rick (who I keep hoping is being sardonic)--in case he is  
not--and   to Pat:  

<etc.>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager