And it was shot in southern Alberta.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Confessions of a "man"-loving woman
> Both are great films. But if you want romantic, see Brokeback Mountain.
> (Mountains are in it, but they are not the main topic.) Neither is
> comedy. Neither is violent. Both are thoughtful.
> >>> [log in to unmask] 04/09/06 9:28 PM >>>
> I called my husband on the cell phone yesterday while out during the day
> asked what he wanted to do during the evening, as we had no plans. He
> that he already took care of that, that he had went to the video store
> took out the new Pride and Prejudice that had just come out on video
> that I had
> been longing to see. Well, it was very sweet of my husband, but it was
> extremely poor, pathetic adaptation, and I can't believe that it had
> nominated for Academy Awards. The one before this one, I really loved,
> the one
> before that was great also, and the book best of all, but this film was
> awful. And, this is truth, and not politics. My husband asked me today
> I wanted to see the next time he was at the video store, and I couldn't
> up my mind between Good Night and Good Luck and that mountain film,
> Mountain, I think it's called. Anyone have any great suggestion,
> keeping in
> mind that I like thoughtful(but not violent) and that I like
> well done), and comedy only when extremely well done.
> In a message dated 4/9/2006 5:55:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> Dear Gunnar,
> How wonderfully 17th C politically correct you are. How comfortable to
> choose what is nice and ignore all the reasons others are offended.
> soothingly normal to remain the norm and to be in the category of the
> those whose
> politics are truth and not politics.
> How politic to be so political in so ancient a way.
> As for das Ewigweibliche, for god's sake, read deBeauvoir (no need to
> anything too new) and notice some changes in that politically correct
> definition of all non-male humanity. Nothing has been more politically
> correct in
> all of history as the political definition of women as not the
> "inclusive" and
> men as the norm of humanity.
> I am astonished that you care so much about all other groups who have
> historically excluded, and now you champion militant masculinism and
> resort to
> such absurd ostensible reasons, or rather personal assertions.
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/304 - Release Date: 4/7/2006