|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: A saying
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:17:08 -0700 |
55 lines |
A saying
|
P |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:48:57 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:04:21 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:51:23 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
Tom Colket |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:34:29 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:07:44 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:22 -0700 |
215 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
Jerome Walsh |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:45:05 -0700 |
168 lines |
Re: A seach challenge for Rick
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:10:26 -0400 |
146 lines |
A seach challenge for Rick
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:57:56 -0400 |
214 lines |
Re: Affirmation of Life and Love in Eliot (was Re: Eliot and Keats)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:07:06 -0700 |
682 lines |
Re: Affirmation of Life and Love in Eliot (was Re: Eliot and Keats)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:47:14 -0700 |
567 lines |
Re: Affirmation of Life and Love in Eliot (was Re: Eliot and Keats)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:49:14 -0700 |
297 lines |
Re: Affirmation of Life and Love in Eliot (was Re: Eliot and Keats)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:25:17 -0700 |
235 lines |
Affirmation of Life and Love in Eliot (was Re: Eliot and Keats)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:35:18 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: An extra verse....
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:23:08 -0700 |
142 lines |
Re: An extra verse....
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:05:12 -0700 |
116 lines |
Re: An extra verse....
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 05:14:01 -0700 |
70 lines |
An extra verse....
|
David Boyd |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:24:23 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:39:07 -0700 |
233 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Tom Gray |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:13:29 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:12:14 -0400 |
119 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
P |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:57:23 -0700 |
80 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Tom Gray |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:08:17 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:32:05 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:27:07 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:28:51 -0400 |
156 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:15:05 -0400 |
130 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:15:13 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:06:42 -0700 |
59 lines |
Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
<> |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:58:11 -0400 |
118 lines |
Re: Aspirant upper-class English humour - the epitome
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:00:45 -0700 |
33 lines |
Aspirant upper-class English humour - the epitome
|
David Boyd |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:48:43 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Babble
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:10:52 -0700 |
176 lines |
Re: Babble
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:49:37 -0700 |
162 lines |
Re: Babble
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:13:51 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Babble
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:59:00 -0400 |
179 lines |
Re: Babble
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:21:18 -0700 |
25 lines |
Babble
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:05:00 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Bawdy Sources--Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 21:56:33 -0400 |
610 lines |
Re: Bawdy Sources--Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:01:42 -0700 |
352 lines |
Bawdy Sources--Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 20:43:57 -0400 |
404 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
Peter Dillane |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:09:43 +1000 |
216 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:30:37 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:24:12 -0700 |
172 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:10:15 -0500 |
668 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:54:47 -0400 |
147 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:07:11 -0700 |
166 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:04:13 +1000 |
163 lines |
Re: Bawdy verse
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:23:15 -0400 |
196 lines |
Bawdy verse
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:13:36 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Bolo in the Tyro
|
P |
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:56:33 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Bolo in the Tyro
|
P |
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:14:37 -0700 |
29 lines |
Bolo in the Tyro
|
Rickard Parker |
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:40:09 -0500 |
22 lines |
Booze et. al.
|
David Boyd |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:11:33 +0100 |
174 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:17:25 -0700 |
261 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:29:42 -0400 |
434 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:17:58 -0400 |
409 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
P |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:04:10 -0700 |
293 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Tom Colket |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:35:27 -0400 |
315 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
P |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:42:15 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:26:08 -0400 |
151 lines |
Re: Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:09:07 -0500 |
51 lines |
Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Tom Colket |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:21:54 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Curtius on TWL--A seach challenge for Rick
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:51:14 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Curtius on TWL--A seach challenge for Rick
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:27:04 -0500 |
24 lines |
Curtius on TWL--A seach challenge for Rick
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:16:35 -0400 |
96 lines |
Eliot & Pound - The Barnes & Noble Review
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:19:08 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: Eliot and Keats
|
P |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:47:37 -0700 |
360 lines |
Re: Eliot and Keats
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:07:02 -0700 |
265 lines |
Re: Eliot and Keats
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:31:06 -0700 |
234 lines |
Re: Eliot and Keats
|
P |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:45:33 -0700 |
235 lines |
Eliot and Keats
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:32:20 -0700 |
174 lines |
Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:43:14 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:13:21 -0700 |
433 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:55:17 -0700 |
401 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:59:21 -0700 |
366 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:45:47 -0700 |
316 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:59:39 -0700 |
346 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:41:42 -0700 |
265 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:54:35 -0700 |
215 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:03:48 -0400 |
326 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:54:12 -0700 |
125 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:21:41 -0400 |
217 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:53:57 -0700 |
105 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:26:16 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:03:58 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:56:47 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:30:12 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:00:23 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
David Boyd |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:41:55 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Eliot ipsum
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:45:43 -0400 |
41 lines |
Eliot ipsum
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:35:14 -0700 |
12 lines |
Eliot's Bawdy Verse (was Re: What a long interchange . . . .)
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 18:41:33 -0700 |
225 lines |
Re: Eliot's big hands
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:17:15 -0700 |
77 lines |
Eliot's big hands
|
John Grant |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 07:30:48 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:43:19 -0400 |
126 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:20:18 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
P |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:32:57 -0700 |
243 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:07:17 -0400 |
135 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:45:59 -0400 |
364 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:11:16 -0700 |
175 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:04:08 -0400 |
290 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:26:52 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:42:47 -0400 |
221 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 05:03:11 -0700 |
64 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:33:02 -0700 |
118 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:31:11 -0400 |
187 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:57:47 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: Eliot's blue verses
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:53:31 -0400 |
121 lines |
Eliot's blue verses
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:28:15 -0700 |
60 lines |
Eliot's growing detachment from poetry (was Re: Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:32:06 -0700 |
261 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 04:37:58 -0700 |
162 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Peter Dillane |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:31:32 +1000 |
218 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:02:49 -0700 |
120 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Peter Dillane |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:02:47 +1000 |
142 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:50:42 -0700 |
604 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:26:29 -0700 |
603 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:35:32 -0700 |
556 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:35:37 -0700 |
625 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
David Boyd |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:52:25 +0100 |
603 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 09:11:13 -0700 |
505 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:58:34 -0700 |
378 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:53:48 -0700 |
409 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:38:42 -0700 |
382 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:08:06 -0700 |
353 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:25:06 -0700 |
372 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:26:17 -0700 |
293 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:01:43 -0700 |
310 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:32:13 -0700 |
255 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:14:59 -0700 |
199 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:14:50 -0700 |
391 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:40:20 -0700 |
292 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:34:34 -0400 |
371 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:33:06 -0400 |
333 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:01:39 -0700 |
219 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:32:05 -0700 |
197 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:22:49 -0400 |
296 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:19:46 -0700 |
177 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:57:41 -0400 |
190 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:35:38 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:18:46 -0400 |
145 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:08:38 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:26:32 -0700 |
60 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:48:09 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Richard Seddon |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:16:36 -0600 |
524 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:37 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:32:11 -0700 |
241 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:24:56 -0400 |
163 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Richard Seddon |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:24:16 -0600 |
362 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:55:29 -0700 |
122 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:10:34 -0700 |
127 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:10:08 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Richard Seddon |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:41:08 -0600 |
197 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:39:24 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:29:42 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Richard Seddon |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:09:42 -0600 |
124 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:18:28 -0400 |
511 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:48:32 -0700 |
614 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:12:38 -0400 |
467 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:44:30 -0700 |
396 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:32:08 -0400 |
442 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:50:57 -0700 |
289 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
David Boyd |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:28:32 +0100 |
222 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:21:12 -0400 |
187 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
David Boyd |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:37:35 +0100 |
141 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:41:27 -0400 |
266 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
David Boyd |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:15:12 +0100 |
252 lines |
Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:17:24 -0400 |
140 lines |
Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:13:22 -0700 |
63 lines |
Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:55:35 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:49:15 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:03:15 -0700 |
171 lines |
Re: Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:31:31 -0700 |
179 lines |
Re: Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:04:09 -0700 |
132 lines |
Eliot's Search for Religious Conviction
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:40:14 -0700 |
10 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:44:31 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:26:14 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Tom Colket |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:22:24 -0400 |
203 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
David Boyd |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:16:08 +0100 |
208 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
David Boyd |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:54:20 +0100 |
13320 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:26:21 -0400 |
162 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:47:03 -0400 |
203 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:42:52 -0400 |
156 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:33:51 -0400 |
132 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:12:30 -0400 |
150 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:45:26 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:28:03 -0400 |
89 lines |
Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:45:28 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE -- "a resonant happiness"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:45:50 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Faulkner
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:13:05 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Faulkner
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:41:14 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Faulkner
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:11:49 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: Faulkner
|
P |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:26:06 -0700 |
26 lines |
Faulkner
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:51:54 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: fulgurating (OT)
|
P |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:41:54 -0700 |
115 lines |
Re: fulgurating (OT)
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:26:09 +1000 |
162 lines |
Re: fulgurating (OT)
|
P |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:04:19 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: fulgurating (OT)
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:17:48 +1000 |
94 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:15:04 -0700 |
502 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:23:10 -0700 |
476 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:44:01 -0700 |
309 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:31:50 -0700 |
802 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:22:20 -0700 |
427 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:39:40 -0700 |
459 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:09:00 -0700 |
353 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:33:18 -0700 |
241 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:55:31 -0700 |
245 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:00:05 -0700 |
191 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:10:03 -0700 |
130 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:51:46 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:41:41 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:23:04 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:02:30 -0700 |
156 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 05:14:03 -0700 |
353 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:30:25 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:39:40 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:36:53 -0700 |
261 lines |
Fwd: Eliot's Paradox [ was Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism]
|
P |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:44:29 -0700 |
394 lines |
Fwd: Re: Eliot's Poetic Mode: Tradition and Innovation
|
P |
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:33:20 -0700 |
18 lines |
Fwd: Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot, Pound, Spender, Sitwell
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:43:54 -0700 |
17 lines |
Re: Fwd: Re: Sweeney's golden grin?
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:09:39 -0700 |
55 lines |
Fwd: Re: Sweeney's golden grin?
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:08:30 -0700 |
19 lines |
Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 23:09:32 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: Fwd: TYROS (again)
|
P |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 04:11:59 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: Fwd: TYROS (again)
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 05:45:46 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Fwd: TYROS (again)
|
P |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 03:16:42 -0700 |
28 lines |
Fwd: TYROS (again)
|
P |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 03:02:28 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
Jerome Walsh |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:20:18 -0700 |
231 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:55:59 -0700 |
246 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
Peter Dillane |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:01:47 +1000 |
287 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
Jerome Walsh |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:31:14 -0700 |
192 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
David Boyd |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:30:08 +0100 |
10833 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:52:17 -0700 |
204 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
Peter Dillane |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:23:59 +1000 |
234 lines |
Re: ipsum esse subsistens
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:11:45 -0700 |
137 lines |
ipsum esse subsistens
|
Peter Dillane |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:42:51 +1000 |
172 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:45:37 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:17:21 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:43:54 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:42:21 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:12:09 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:05:03 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: King Bolo
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:53:26 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 01:54:27 +1000 |
97 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:00:09 -0400 |
128 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:46:33 -0700 |
219 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Peter Dillane |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:46:52 +1000 |
177 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:37:11 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Peter Dillane |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:57:12 +1000 |
96 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 23:39:30 -0400 |
281 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:04:57 -0700 |
193 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:29:48 -0400 |
288 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
John Angell Grant |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:44:46 -0700 |
237 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:32:48 -0400 |
212 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
David Boyd |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:54:55 +0100 |
198 lines |
Re: King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:51:20 -0700 |
108 lines |
King Bolo and Eliot's large hands
|
John Angell Grant |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:28:37 -0700 |
116 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:54:21 -0400 |
208 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:56:04 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 09:53:33 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:31:36 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Jerome Walsh |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 06:26:45 -0700 |
125 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:10:14 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Ken Armstrong |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:17:34 -0400 |
256 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:37:16 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:16:57 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: Labels
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:13:08 -0700 |
88 lines |
Labels
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:31:09 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Labels; now OT: faith
|
Jerome Walsh |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:49:51 -0700 |
231 lines |
Re: LEWIS criticism
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:31:08 -0700 |
124 lines |
Re: LEWIS criticism
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:29:26 +0000 |
113 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:41:07 -0700 |
97 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 23:48:58 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:41:13 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:34:10 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:11:02 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
David Boyd |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:51:40 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
David Boyd |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:30:31 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:25:59 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 03:04:24 -0700 |
18 lines |
LEWIS' portrait of Eliot
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 02:54:24 -0700 |
11 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot, Pound, Spender, Sitwell
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:08:06 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot, Pound, Spender, Sitwell
|
David Boyd |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:34:29 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: LEWIS' portrait of Eliot, Pound, Spender, Sitwell
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:32:18 +0000 |
914 lines |
MY TS ELIOT
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:39:36 -0700 |
58 lines |
No ultimate authority
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:51:14 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Orchestrating 'The Waste Land'
|
P |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:28:06 -0700 |
124 lines |
Orchestrating 'The Waste Land'
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:09:31 -0700 |
99 lines |
Re: OT - Photos - National Geographic
|
P |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:46:36 -0700 |
35 lines |
OT - Photos - National Geographic
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:28:41 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: OT - Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:05:47 -0700 |
33 lines |
OT - Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:42:27 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: OT - Spooky Action at a Distance
|
P |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:46:01 -0700 |
190 lines |
OT - Spooky Action at a Distance
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:19:31 -0500 |
182 lines |
Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:56:50 -0700 |
308 lines |
Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:41:12 -0700 |
257 lines |
Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:07:44 -0700 |
159 lines |
Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:36:57 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:00:11 -0500 |
35 lines |
OT - The mystique of Keats's mysticism
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:21:22 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:30:36 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:21:01 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 22:17:35 +0100 |
211 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:42:38 -0400 |
192 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 20:55:19 +0100 |
164 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:50:22 -0700 |
129 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:43:18 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:19:20 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:48:31 -0400 |
193 lines |
Post just for fun: Olympics once awarded medals for poetry
|
Tom Colket |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:42:19 -0400 |
176 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:35:27 -0500 |
247 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Tom Gray |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:28:53 -0700 |
227 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Tom Gray |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 05:35:13 -0700 |
335 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:34:55 -0400 |
164 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Tom Colket |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 16:05:11 -0400 |
506 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:27:46 -0400 |
440 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Tom Gray |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:00:24 -0700 |
286 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Jerome Walsh |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:06:08 -0700 |
305 lines |
Re: Proving a negative?
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:49:31 -0400 |
316 lines |
Proving a negative?
|
Tom Colket |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:09:09 -0400 |
272 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:31:24 -0700 |
231 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:21:01 -0700 |
260 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
P |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:15:27 -0700 |
222 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:14:42 -0400 |
321 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:11:08 -0400 |
329 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:05:30 -0400 |
321 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:53:56 -0500 |
124 lines |
Re: Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Tom Gray |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:42:10 -0700 |
221 lines |
Racism and War, was Article: "To College Students Considering a Course in American Poetry"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:11:28 -0400 |
203 lines |
Re: Rainey
|
P |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:23:27 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: Rainey
|
Cassandra Laity |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:52:41 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Rainey
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:23:03 -0400 |
165 lines |
Rainey
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:16:02 +0000 |
45 lines |
seriously
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:03:27 -0400 |
214 lines |
seriously
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:36:05 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Sweeney's golden grin?
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:39:44 -0700 |
530 lines |
Re: T.S. Eliot's Columbo and Bolo poems
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 08:28:00 -0700 |
214 lines |
Re: T.S. Eliot's Columbo and Bolo poems
|
John Angell Grant |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 22:29:41 -0700 |
158 lines |
Re: T.S. Eliot's Columbo and Bolo poems
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 20:27:31 -0700 |
126 lines |
T.S. Eliot's Columbo and Bolo poems
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:13:16 -0700 |
110 lines |
Test. Enjoy.
|
P |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:45:49 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: The Elder Statesman
|
P |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:58:29 -0700 |
74 lines |
The Elder Statesman
|
John Angell Grant |
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:33:00 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: The Elder Statesman (was Re: Eliot ipsum)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:47:57 -0400 |
186 lines |
Re: The Elder Statesman (was Re: Eliot ipsum)
|
P |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:09:20 -0700 |
128 lines |
The Elder Statesman (was Re: Eliot ipsum)
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:57:57 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:23:13 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 05:18:56 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
Rickard Parker |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:22:02 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
P |
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:56:16 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:55:04 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:26:11 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
P |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:16:09 -0700 |
30 lines |
The man who translated T S Eliot in Hindi
|
Rickard Parker |
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:07:51 -0500 |
25 lines |
The Waste Land 2012
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:00:23 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: They're digging Grampa's Grave to Build a Sewer
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:21:05 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: They're digging Grampa's Grave to Build a Sewer
|
David Boyd |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:14:46 +0100 |
54 lines |
They're digging Grampa's Grave to Build a Sewer
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:56:30 -0400 |
44 lines |
To Tom-- A search challenge for Rick
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:47:49 -0400 |
144 lines |
Re: To Tom-- Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
PT2 |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:59:06 -0400 |
211 lines |
Re: To Tom-- Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:12:31 -0500 |
205 lines |
To Tom-- Conventions, both Republican and Internet
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:53:26 -0400 |
367 lines |
Re: Turribly OT: Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
P |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:56:24 -0700 |
50 lines |
Turribly OT: Re: Ernst Curtius on TSE
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:24:58 -0400 |
66 lines |
TYROS
|
P |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 02:58:26 -0700 |
15 lines |
Video of "Sweeney Agonistes" staging
|
John Angell Grant |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:59:50 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:55:03 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:50:38 -0700 |
135 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:15:11 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:41:26 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:50:15 -0400 |
212 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:49:13 -0400 |
250 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:33:48 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:32:39 -0700 |
88 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Colket |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:04:09 -0400 |
188 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:35:51 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Colket |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:55:10 -0400 |
177 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Gray |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 02:49:18 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:38:23 -0700 |
255 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:56:29 -0700 |
225 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:49:13 -0400 |
323 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:46:03 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:16:53 -0700 |
254 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Colket |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:01:45 -0400 |
305 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:08:08 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:08:41 -0700 |
125 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:01:29 -0400 |
896 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:27:44 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Peter Dillane |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:10:44 +1000 |
65 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:58:20 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:39:36 -0700 |
100 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:17:25 -0400 |
154 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:31:02 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Peter Dillane |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:25:34 +1000 |
49 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:51:40 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 07:49:54 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:48:34 -0700 |
234 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:47:31 -0400 |
345 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:47:39 -0700 |
270 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:21:59 -0700 |
185 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:18:18 -0400 |
137 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Tom Colket |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 07:10:15 -0400 |
304 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:43:20 -0700 |
192 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:16:14 -0700 |
150 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
P |
Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:54:06 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: What a long interchange . . . .
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:27:27 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: What a long interchange--Kerrymuir
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:32:23 -0400 |
275 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:48:47 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
P |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:09:31 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:41:43 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
John Angell Grant |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:00 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
David Boyd |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:44:03 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
John Angell Grant |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:27:21 -0700 |
71 lines |
What Eliot's complex plays did for the theater
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:32:09 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Who?
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:06:00 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Who?
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:14:34 -0400 |
96 lines |
Re: Who?
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:12:28 -0500 |
33 lines |
Who?
|
P |
Sun, 5 Aug 2012 06:03:17 -0700 |
13 lines |
Re: Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
P |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:58:11 -0700 |
158 lines |
Re: Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:16:09 -0500 |
152 lines |
Re: Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:27:40 -0700 |
137 lines |
Re: Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:22:46 -0700 |
137 lines |
Re: Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
Peter Dillane |
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:19:13 +1000 |
132 lines |
Why did E. write and show all that crap?
|
P |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:19:33 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Wyndham Lewis and TS Eliot: A Friendship (was Re: LEWIS criticism)
|
P |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:56:43 -0700 |
136 lines |
Wyndham Lewis and TS Eliot: A Friendship (was Re: LEWIS criticism)
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:02:47 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: [ON TOPIC]Publish Bolo?
|
P |
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 03:18:26 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: [ON TOPIC]What a long interchange! Trust sex to light such a fire. RE: Bolo: The thought occurs that if one has a prodigious talent and wants to keep it in shape by exercise, yet claims that inspiration comes like toothpaste out of a tube, why not reve
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 22:18:13 -0700 |
123 lines |
Re: [ON TOPIC]What a long interchange! Trust sex to light such a fire. RE: Bolo: The thought occurs that if one has a prodigious talent and wants to keep it in shape by exercise, yet claims that inspiration comes like toothpaste out of a tube, why not revert to the most primitive (cf definition of auditory imagination) to crank the engine. Even puerile crap can generate cleverly imaginative tropes.
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 20:06:51 -0400 |
55 lines |
[ON TOPIC]What a long interchange! Trust sex to light such a fire. RE: Bolo: The thought occurs that if one has a prodigious talent and wants to keep it in shape by exercise, yet claims that inspiration comes like toothpaste out of a tube, why not revert to the most primitive (cf definition of auditory imagination) to crank the engine. Even puerile crap can generate cleverly imaginative tropes.
|
P |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:20:32 -0700 |
17 lines |
