|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: "Art"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:22:10 -0700 |
207 lines |
Re: "Art"
|
David Boyd |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:10:02 +0100 |
157 lines |
Re: "Art"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:15:13 -0700 |
153 lines |
Re: "Art"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:50:08 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: "Art"
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:02:55 +0100 |
240 lines |
'Mr. Eliot's Sunday Morning Service' (was Re: Painter of the Umbrian School)
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:37:56 -0700 |
192 lines |
Re: 'our mad poetics'
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:57:54 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: 'our mad poetics'
|
P |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:09:02 -0700 |
102 lines |
'our mad poetics'
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:24:33 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: 'Sweeney Agonistes' -- a third fragment
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:51:22 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: 'Sweeney Agonistes' -- a third fragment
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 10:18:21 -0700 |
245 lines |
Re: 'Sweeney Agonistes' -- a third fragment
|
Tom Colket |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:17:09 -0400 |
517 lines |
'Sweeney Agonistes' -- a third fragment
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:20:00 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: // Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God? //
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:02:07 -0700 |
88 lines |
<No subject>
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:59:55 -0500 |
195 lines |
<No subject>
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:35:03 +0100 |
129 lines |
Arena - TS Eliot (BBC) (was Re: TS Eliot: Two Videos)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:32:38 -0700 |
334 lines |
Re: Avuncular Tom
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:09:12 -0700 |
89 lines |
Avuncular Tom
|
David Boyd |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:26:04 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Eliot quotes as titles
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:17:03 -0700 |
105 lines |
Eliot quotes as titles
|
Rickard Parker |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:57:40 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Eliot reads 'Prufrock' -- an animated version
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:17:30 -0700 |
60 lines |
Eliot reads 'Prufrock' -- an animated version
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:09:05 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Eliot versus Capitalism (was Re: universities and "business")
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:03:44 -0700 |
228 lines |
Eliot versus Capitalism (was Re: universities and "business")
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:35:04 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Tom Gray |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:03:52 -0700 |
350 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Rickard Parker |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:21:52 -0500 |
143 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
P |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:59:47 -0700 |
136 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Tom Gray |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:19:57 -0700 |
115 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
P |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:39:41 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Rickard Parker |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:22:18 -0500 |
37 lines |
Fw: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:06:31 -0700 |
349 lines |
Fw: [Mcluhan] 2013 Convention of the Media Ecology Association—Call for Papers
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:28:59 -0700 |
694 lines |
Fw: [Mcluhan] 2013 Convention of the Media Ecology Association—Call for Papers
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:35:03 -0700 |
696 lines |
Fw: [Mcluhan] T.S. Eliot's Parisian Year
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:45:29 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
P |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:23:55 -0700 |
14 lines |
Re: FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
Richard Seddon |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:52:12 -0600 |
383 lines |
Re: FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:08:03 -0500 |
464 lines |
Re: FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:10:23 -0400 |
189 lines |
Re: FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
P |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:36:33 -0700 |
165 lines |
FW: [Pen-l] The Krugman-Layard "Manifesto for Economic Sense"
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:44:39 -0500 |
301 lines |
Fwd:
|
P |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:57:17 -0700 |
100 lines |
Re: How Eliot
|
P |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:43:08 -0700 |
193 lines |
Re: How Eliot Saw His Letters
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:06:32 -0700 |
191 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:48:17 -0700 |
177 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:27:43 -0500 |
173 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:51:22 -0700 |
152 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:30:22 -0500 |
148 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:38:35 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Rickard Parker |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:08:10 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Rickard Parker |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:04:33 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:26:22 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:33:22 -0700 |
160 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:19:21 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Rickard Parker |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:33:03 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:39:06 -0700 |
158 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:50:59 -0700 |
267 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:20:06 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:56:00 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:51:25 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:11:46 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:51:01 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:46:34 -0400 |
232 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:17:03 -0700 |
155 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:06:30 -0700 |
155 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:29:00 -0700 |
146 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:23:28 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Rickard Parker |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:07:18 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:06:36 -0700 |
114 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:02:48 -0700 |
110 lines |
Re: How Eliot saw his letters.
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:43:52 -0700 |
81 lines |
How Eliot saw his letters.
|
P |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:56:57 -0700 |
12 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:06:27 -0700 |
4419 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
P |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:06:19 -0700 |
129 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:59:52 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:41:03 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Rickard Parker |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:10:15 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:36:23 -0500 |
326 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:05:06 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Rickard Parker |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:54:09 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Kate Troy |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:25:54 -0400 |
447 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Rickard Parker |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:52:14 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:49:12 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Rickard Parker |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:15:25 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:47:01 -0500 |
419 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:06:13 -0400 |
149 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:11:52 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
P |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:35:34 -0700 |
41 lines |
il miglior fabbro
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:57:01 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro
|
P |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:06:43 -0700 |
176 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:54:13 -0700 |
124 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro
|
P |
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:23:26 -0700 |
123 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:23:23 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:10:35 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: il miglior fabbro
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:35:06 -0700 |
64 lines |
il miglior fabbro
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:32:23 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:56:00 -0400 |
792 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:37:14 -0700 |
494 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:34:30 -0700 |
1047 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:27:52 -0400 |
754 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:15:35 -0700 |
491 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:01:07 -0700 |
473 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:50:04 -0700 |
441 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:18:33 -0400 |
642 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:07:06 -0700 |
399 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:42:23 -0400 |
573 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:29:59 -0700 |
360 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:45:19 -0400 |
487 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:29:45 -0700 |
314 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:12:14 -0700 |
359 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:48:43 -0700 |
333 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:27:28 -0700 |
333 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:32:00 -0700 |
578 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:25:19 -0700 |
590 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:19:51 -0700 |
556 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:23:55 -0700 |
355 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:29:01 -0700 |
307 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:25:41 -0700 |
289 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
mikemail |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:01:24 +0300 |
534 lines |
Re: Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:59:53 -0400 |
368 lines |
Il miglior fabbro: "Why then Ile fit you."
|
Chokh Raj |
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:44:48 -0700 |
227 lines |
Letters of T.S. Eliot, Volume 3
|
Tom Colket |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:57:15 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: LISTSERV and vacation options
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:01:57 +1000 |
55 lines |
Re: LISTSERV and vacation options
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:36:25 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: LISTSERV and vacation options
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:11:59 +1000 |
19 lines |
LISTSERV and vacation options
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:03:26 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: London Review of Books: The Letters of T.S. Eliot Volume 3: 1926-27
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:58:22 -0700 |
132 lines |
Re: London Review of Books: The Letters of T.S. Eliot Volume 3: 1926-27
|
P |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:51:52 -0700 |
165 lines |
Re: London Review of Books: The Letters of T.S. Eliot Volume 3: 1926-27
|
P |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:34:46 -0700 |
136 lines |
Re: London Review of Books: The Letters of T.S. Eliot Volume 3: 1926-27
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:06:13 -0700 |
134 lines |
London Review of Books: The Letters of T.S. Eliot Volume 3: 1926-27
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:02:24 -0700 |
111 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? St-udy probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
David Boyd |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:30:21 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? St-udy probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Peter Dillane |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 00:39:04 +1000 |
29 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? St-udy probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:00:01 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:47:29 +1000 |
82 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
David Boyd |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 04:34:16 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: off topic -Re: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:24:35 -0700 |
204 lines |
off topic -Re: Cold case solved? Study probes riddle of sinking beer bubbles
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:09:25 +1000 |
116 lines |
Re: OT - Faber Books' photostream
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:48:04 -0700 |
134 lines |
Re: OT - Faber Books' photostream
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:32:06 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: OT - Faber Books' photostream
|
David Boyd |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:36:02 +0100 |
81 lines |
OT - Faber Books' photostream
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:57:13 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:54:25 -0700 |
468 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:34:33 -0700 |
192 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:09:24 -0700 |
200 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:33:44 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:05:31 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: OT - Transit Venus
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:44:56 -0700 |
50 lines |
OT - Transit Venus
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:11:14 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: OT TB
|
Peter Dillane |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:20:47 +1000 |
137 lines |
Re: Painter of the Umbrian School
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:17:46 -0500 |
158 lines |
Re: Painter of the Umbrian School
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:13:51 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: Painter of the Umbrian School
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:54:36 -0400 |
26 lines |
Painter of the Umbrian School
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:26:21 +0000 |
16 lines |
Re: Painter of the Umbrian School / Summer TSE
|
Materer, Timothy J. |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:15:42 +0000 |
126 lines |
Re: Pardon, please
|
P |
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:57:29 -0700 |
115 lines |
Passport photos of the Eliots are online
|
Rickard Parker |
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:36:08 -0500 |
24 lines |
Review of Letters of TSE, volume 3
|
Rickard Parker |
Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:43:44 -0500 |
21 lines |
Test
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:19:10 -0700 |
41 lines |
The "eternal Footman" in 'Prufrock'
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 08:07:57 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: The Temple Classics version of "The Divine Comedy" is available online
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:46:23 -0500 |
56 lines |
The Temple Classics version of "The Divine Comedy" is available online
|
Rickard Parker |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:12:22 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: The Waste Land as a War Poem (Was Re: Yeats, An Irish Airman . . .)
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:03:51 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:35:10 -0700 |
650 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:04:43 -0700 |
604 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:05:12 -0700 |
586 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
P |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:47:01 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:59:40 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:30:20 +0100 |
877 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:28:19 +0100 |
1129 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:11:09 -0700 |
690 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:52:09 -0700 |
635 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:39:18 -0700 |
573 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:29:47 -0700 |
514 lines |
Re: The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:13:11 -0700 |
479 lines |
The Waste Land's Absolutist Poetics
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:23:38 -0700 |
442 lines |
Re: Tiresias
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:26:43 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: Tiresias
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:24:44 -0400 |
141 lines |
Tiresias
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:33:20 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: TS Eliot … the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:00:48 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: TS Eliot … the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:54:10 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: TS Eliot … the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:38:08 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: TS Eliot … the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Rickard Parker |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:38:30 -0500 |
24 lines |
TS Eliot … the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 05:04:25 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: TS Eliot . the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Rickard Parker |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:02:35 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: TS Eliot . the inspiration for countless rock musicians
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:06:08 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:51:54 -0700 |
414 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:01:31 -0700 |
179 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
P |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:49:44 -0700 |
188 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:10:35 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Chokh Raj |
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:43:24 -0700 |
141 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:25:40 -0700 |
119 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:31:05 -0400 |
126 lines |
TS Eliot: A Song for Simeon
|
Chokh Raj |
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:05:32 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: TS Eliot: Two Videos
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:19:57 -0700 |
413 lines |
TS Eliot: Two Videos
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:10:36 -0700 |
242 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:04:43 -0700 |
300 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:43:45 -0500 |
961 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:14:50 -0700 |
530 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:10:21 -0400 |
365 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:07:42 -0400 |
767 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
David Boyd |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:52:18 +0100 |
350 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:27:54 -0700 |
469 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:21:23 -0700 |
282 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:13:50 -0700 |
155 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:05:06 -0700 |
1054 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:41:02 -0700 |
918 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:48:28 -0400 |
317 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
John Morgenstern |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:37:35 +0200 |
339 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:24:39 +0100 |
288 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:25:16 -0400 |
347 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:56:51 -0400 |
263 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:40:03 +0100 |
214 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:17:42 -0400 |
176 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:43:37 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:53:05 -0400 |
842 lines |
Re: universities and "business"
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:13:21 +0100 |
750 lines |
universities and "business"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:50:46 -0400 |
628 lines |
Re: unsubscribing
|
Rickard Parker |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:20:24 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: unsubscribing
|
John Morgenstern |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:27:06 +0200 |
79 lines |
unsubscribing
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:20:47 -0400 |
62 lines |
Why did God believe in TS Eliot? (was Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?)
|
Chokh Raj |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:42:41 -0700 |
142 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Rickard Parker |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:48:52 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:19:04 -0700 |
106 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Dillane |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:56:58 +1000 |
435 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
David Boyd |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 03:49:21 -0400 |
430 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Dillane |
Thu, 7 Jun 2012 08:47:35 +1000 |
2453 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:09:11 -0400 |
995 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Jerome Walsh |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 21:54:43 -0700 |
531 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Dillane |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:00:38 +1000 |
1693 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Jerome Walsh |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:42:22 -0700 |
421 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Dillane |
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:33:28 +1000 |
1135 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:53:19 -0700 |
504 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:28:44 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Jerome Walsh |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:25:21 -0700 |
219 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:13:20 -0700 |
308 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:05:13 -0700 |
346 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
John Angell Grant |
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:53:57 -0700 |
276 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 19:32:43 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 19:30:11 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:47:20 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 08:49:59 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:50:56 -0700 |
308 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:58:17 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Jerome Walsh |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:29:33 -0700 |
112 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:11:15 -0700 |
170 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
John Grant |
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:40:19 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:11:13 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Why did T.S. Eliot believe in God?
|
Chokh Raj |
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:53:57 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: [Mcluhan] 2013 Convention of the Media Ecology Association—Call for Papers
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:35:56 -0700 |
732 lines |
