LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


March 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary. (1 message)
"Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . . (14 messages)
"Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy (35 messages)
'Gerontion' (22 messages)
'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy (22 messages)
'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc (87 messages)
'Gerontion' --knob (4 messages)
'Gerontion'--sorry if this comes twice (2 messages)
Another arc (1 message)
Bits & Pieces (3 messages)
Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry (36 messages)
Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders) (40 messages)
Eliot aand theVirgin Mary. (2 messages)
Eliot on birth control (3 messages)
Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color) (4 messages)
Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism (54 messages)
Eliot's Readership & the Poems (13 messages)
ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership) (20 messages)
Four Quartets -- a reading experience (6 messages)
Naming - (was: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism) (2 messages)
Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay (9 messages)
old man (5 messages)
Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010 (6 messages)
Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010] (1 message)
Ooops Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc (3 messages)
Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family. (7 messages)
OT - Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry (2 messages)
OT - Re: old man (3 messages)
OT: "queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary. (1 message)
OT: Re: signs and wonders (1 message)
OT: William Arrowsmith (6 messages)
Pound & Dante (2 messages)
signs and wonders (81 messages)
T.S. Eliot, apparations and Scientific American (3 messages)
The late Pat Sloane (6 messages)
TS Eliot - Updates on Guardian, UK (2 messages)
Varieties of Conspiracy Theory (1 message)
William Arrowsmith (1 message)
Wm. Jamesian squabble--was Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry (3 messages)
[Fwd: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010] (1 message)
[Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Hurt Locker] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Re: "queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:43:56 -0800

261 lines

New Thread

"Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:20:10 -0800

39 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:09:26 -0800

30 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:37:04 -0500

58 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Marcia Karp

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:42:06 -0500

30 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:32:41 -0500

20 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:10:24 -0500

701 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:47:00 -0500

42 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 23:04:47 -0800

782 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 20:51:50 -0500

28 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 20:33:03 -0500

30 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

David Boyd

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:45:42 +0000

510 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:35:25 -0500

621 lines

Re: "Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Jerome Walsh

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 10:48:48 -0800

139 lines

"Son of man"--- was Re: Origins. . .

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:12:03 -0500

508 lines

New Thread

"Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:15:42 -0800

212 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:06:55 +0000

345 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:51:05 -0800

95 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:27:50 -0500

168 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:07:47 -0800

55 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:28:25 -0500

561 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:23:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:20:50 -0500

239 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:18:07 -0500

69 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:34:09 -0500

18 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:12:10 -0500

30 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:23:34 -0800

237 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:20:00 -0800

334 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:11:39 -0800

329 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:17:59 -0500

225 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:13:26 -0800

183 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:50:42 -0800

55 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:10:18 -0600

189 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:50:59 -0500

25 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:37 -0500

176 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:01:31 -0500

57 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

DIana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:53:56 -0500

377 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:20:50 -0800

67 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:14:57 -0600

151 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:18 -0600

107 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

George Carless

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:57:42 -0500

33 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:23:08 -0800

212 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:16:19 -0800

232 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:51:16 +0000

268 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:48:22 +0000

281 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:21:49 -0800

93 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:46:10 -0500

80 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:23:13 -0800

53 lines

Re: "Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:14:57 -0500

59 lines

"Us he devours" was ....Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:35 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion'

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 23:14:25 -0800

31 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 15:03:08 -0500

780 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:58:34 -0500

715 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:27:40 -0500

41 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:19:36 -0500

30 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:08:40 -0500

956 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:07:05 -0600

22 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:02:42 -0600

42 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:54:57 -0500

989 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:07:07 -0500

691 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:48:19 -0500

101 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:23:32 -0800

910 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:50:06 -0500

520 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:49:54 -0800

69 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:11:08 -0800

546 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:06:03 -0800

31 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:58:08 -0800

414 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:47:04 -0500

234 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:54:44 -0500

363 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Carrol Cox

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:18:28 -0600

40 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:03:22 -0600

109 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:26:08 -0500

232 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:49:03 -0800

287 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:25:49 -0600

276 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:29:09 -0500

64 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Nancy Gish

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:33:10 -0500

417 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Nancy Gish

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:28:21 -0500

411 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:38:00 -0800

241 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:32:42 -0800

516 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:19:48 -0800

214 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:01:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:58 -0500

233 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:14:00 -0600

22 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:29 -0500

438 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:40:58 -0500

85 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:13:56 -0800

180 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:07:48 -0500

38 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:50:51 -0500

340 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:13:56 -0500

31 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:57:05 -0600

202 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:37:36 -0800

195 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:04:11 +0000

365 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Jerome Walsh

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:51:25 -0800

140 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- Grammatical Accuracy

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:21:26 +0000

260 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:23:43 -0800

214 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:05:52 -0400

206 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:51:22 -0800

162 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:14:36 -0400

112 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:25:19 -0500

95 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:11:47 -0800

76 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:22:41 -0500

49 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:46:50 -0800

43 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:48:41 -0600

20 lines

'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Terry Traynor

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:34:58 -0500

22 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Terry Traynor

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:20:31 -0500

175 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:56:33 -0500

218 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Terry Traynor

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:46:57 -0500

274 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:29:31 -0500

68 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:47:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:03:48 -0800

36 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:57:14 -0800

28 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Terry Traynor

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:38:31 -0500

29 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:10:35 -0500

35 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:18:03 -0500

20 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:44:15 -0500

201 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Jerome Walsh

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:48:03 -0800

72 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:44:29 -0500

112 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Jerome Walsh

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:26:49 -0800

38 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:44:50 -0500

17 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:37:23 -0500

71 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:45:49 -0600

35 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:19:39 -0500

71 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:04:13 -0500

638 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:37:45 -0800

52 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:28:09 -0800

886 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:05:33 -0800

35 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:19:29 -0500

75 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:45:37 -0500

52 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:05:27 +0000

91 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:48:31 -0500

69 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:31:33 -0600

26 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:31:43 -0500

526 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:56:02 -0800

88 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:08:47 -0500

22 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:13:43 -0500

531 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:43:56 -0800

705 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:40:05 -0500

266 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:17:45 -0800

39 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:15:30 -0800

47 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:12:35 -0800

36 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:08:09 -0800

133 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:07:20 -0800

187 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:03:55 -0800

244 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:01:14 -0500

460 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:01:20 -0600

168 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:24:38 -0500

101 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:38:50 -0500

49 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:04:58 -0600

17 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:35:43 -0800

85 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:24:02 -0500

37 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:13:27 -0500

30 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:06:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:06:58 -0500

31 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:17:06 -0600

23 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:22:49 -0500

94 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:17:42 -0500

95 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:11:16 -0500

40 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:06:53 -0500

125 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:57:43 -0500

91 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:55:37 -0500

176 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:52:20 -0500

236 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:36:52 -0800

295 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 23:09:43 -0800

66 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:37:17 -0800

25 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:28:40 -0800

105 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:11:00 -0800

1006 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:09:23 -0800

19 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:07:01 -0800

188 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:46:27 -0800

70 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:36:22 -0800

816 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:35:25 -0800

153 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:27:37 -0800

179 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:41:37 -0500

310 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:14:36 -0600

13 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:20:16 -0500

20 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:08:49 -0500

42 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:21:42 -0500

82 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:48:49 -0500

221 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:10:37 -0500

105 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:47:56 -0500

94 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:03:28 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion' --knob

Re: 'Gerontion' --knob

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:21:34 -0800

47 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' --knob

Marcia Karp

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:43:46 -0500

74 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' --knob

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:23:34 -0500

35 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' --knob

Marcia Karp

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:09:50 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion'--sorry if this comes twice

Re: 'Gerontion'--sorry if this comes twice

Carrol Cox

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:03:20 -0600

324 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'--sorry if this comes twice

Nancy Gish

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:06:10 -0500

467 lines

New Thread

Another arc

Another arc

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:27:02 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Bits & Pieces

Re: Bits & Pieces

Nancy Gish

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:41:34 -0400

140 lines

Re: Bits & Pieces

Nancy Gish

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:04:27 -0400

107 lines

Bits & Pieces

Carrol Cox

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:07:02 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:10:52 -0400

211 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:01:49 -0500

161 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:26:06 -0500

444 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:20:30 -0500

371 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:06:00 -0800

904 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:59:17 -0800

661 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:51:29 -0800

493 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

David Boyd

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:16:05 +0000

224 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:35:27 -0500

75 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:24:06 -0500

64 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:50:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:33:30 -0500

41 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:18:15 -0500

21 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:59:10 -0500

637 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:48:41 -0500

897 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:02:16 -0800

278 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:47:48 -0800

538 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:22:32 +0000

491 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:04:41 +0000

635 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

David Boyd

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:59:34 +0000

416 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:57:04 -0800

285 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

DIana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:51:21 -0500

376 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

DIana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:43:54 -0500

368 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

DIana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:32:12 -0500

232 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:55:07 -0800

416 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:53:36 -0800

286 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:45:39 -0800

423 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:01:46 +0000

541 lines

Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

David Boyd

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:34:11 +0000

312 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:16:05 -0500

127 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

David Boyd

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:32:53 +0000

280 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 00:39:27 -0800

285 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 00:19:35 -0800

107 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

David Boyd

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 07:45:00 +0000

129 lines

Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:18:01 -0500

72 lines

Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:27:24 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:45:21 -0800

677 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:28:22 -0400

570 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:18:52 -0400

629 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:26:26 -0800

78 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:07:02 -0800

51 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:02:31 -0800

566 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:56:51 -0800

673 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:50:51 -0800

47 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:36:11 -0800

626 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:44:12 +0000

138 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:36:54 +0000

209 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Carrol Cox

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:32:46 -0500

38 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:23:24 +0000

642 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:04:06 -0400

556 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:53:23 +0000

549 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:44:00 +0000

545 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:22:20 +0000

442 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:20:21 +0000

136 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:17:12 +0000

219 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:52:08 -0400

58 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:04:25 -0400

33 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:04:49 -0400

438 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:51:54 -0400

209 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:11:16 -0400

76 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Carrol Cox

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:07:23 -0500

39 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:38:24 -0400

150 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:28:20 +0000

110 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:47:27 -0400

31 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:20:13 -0400

449 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:30:42 -0400

364 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:44:02 -0400

367 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:30:30 -0400

294 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:34:36 -0400

294 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:17:49 +0000

314 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:04:07 -0400

235 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:19:29 -0400

118 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Chokh Raj

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:33:49 -0700

44 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:27:24 -0400

169 lines

Re: Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

DIana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:42:17 -0400

74 lines

Dante in the City (was : signs and wonders)

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:25:35 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:37:41 -0500

59 lines

Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:59:06 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Eliot on birth control

Re: Eliot on birth control

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:25:28 -0800

114 lines

Re: Eliot on birth control

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:50:52 -0600

22 lines

Re: Eliot on birth control

Marcia Karp

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:26:42 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color)

Re: Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:51:48 -0800

27 lines

Re: Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:21:04 -0800

41 lines

Re: Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color)

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:44:42 -0600

15 lines

Eliot on birth control (was: Off topic and off color)

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:11:59 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:20:15 -0400

190 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:05:56 -0400

159 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Diana Manister

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:53:30 +0000

150 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:10:14 -0700

139 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:33:04 -0400

96 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:43:04 -0400

52 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:29:20 -0700

27 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:47:24 -0400

100 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:30:03 -0700

68 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:08:40 -0400

154 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Ken Armstrong

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:56:15 -0400

55 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:30:52 -0400

211 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Carrol Cox

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:55:30 -0500

75 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:53:23 -0700

112 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:40:25 -0700

90 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:33:34 -0400

109 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:25:15 -0700

61 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:52:40 -0700

81 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:42:44 -0700

145 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

DIana Manister

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:49:49 -0400

228 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

DIana Manister

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:45:44 -0400

136 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:56:35 -0700

267 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:57:09 -0800

166 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:27:19 -0800

288 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:25:53 -0800

270 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:32:04 -0700

625 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:10:57 -0400

67 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Carrol Cox

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:56:37 -0500

17 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Terry Traynor

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:19:21 -0400

55 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:51:14 -0700

401 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:38:05 -0700

290 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:13:21 -0700

239 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:53:11 -0700

215 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Diana Manister

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:37:41 -0400

174 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:20:09 -0700

166 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:57:07 -0600

49 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:45:08 -0700

120 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:44:44 -0800

102 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:42:12 -0800

218 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:41:10 -0800

362 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:40:00 -0800

45 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Nancy Gish

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:32:25 -0400

187 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:44:02 -0400

94 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Diana Manister

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:55:44 +0000

170 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Chokh Raj

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:35:10 -0700

210 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:35:19 -0800

100 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:26:08 -0400

34 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:07:26 -0400

30 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Diana Manister

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:34:00 +0000

282 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Carrol Cox

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:20:39 -0500

127 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Diana Manister

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:15:38 +0000

228 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Carrol Cox

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:11:34 -0500

72 lines

Re: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

DIana Manister

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:46:09 -0400

52 lines

Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:35:15 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:42:46 -0500

61 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

DIana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:31:22 -0500

57 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:35:49 -0800

37 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:48:02 +0000

353 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:10:47 -0600

17 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:54:47 -0600

146 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:16:04 +0000

214 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:05:59 -0600

84 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:23:08 -0500

62 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 06:13:37 -0500

44 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:24:49 -0600

62 lines

Re: Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:05:29 -0500

25 lines

Eliot's Readership & the Poems

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:36:50 -0600

88 lines

New Thread

ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:53:32 -0800

175 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Nancy Gish

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:17:52 -0500

115 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Chokh Raj

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:47:03 -0800

53 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:26:25 -0500

18 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:17:27 -0800

96 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:58:46 -0800

107 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:54:47 -0800

88 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Terry Traynor

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:38:51 -0500

74 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Terry Traynor

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:37:50 -0500

37 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:33:37 -0800

82 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Nancy Gish

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:24:28 -0500

56 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Terry Traynor

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:36:48 -0500

35 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:49:48 -0600

109 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:44:38 -0800

106 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Terry Traynor

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:56:11 -0500

178 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Jerome Walsh

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:24:57 -0800

104 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Chokh Raj

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:04:50 -0800

79 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:03:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:39:28 -0500

73 lines

ending of 'Gerontion" (was Eliot's Readership)

Terry Traynor

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:24:47 -0500

123 lines

New Thread

Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Re: Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Charles McElwain

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:05:18 -0600

84 lines

Re: Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:10:05 -0800

112 lines

Re: Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:00:06 -0800

249 lines

Re: Four Quartets -- a reading experience

David Boyd

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:49:44 +0000

177 lines

Re: Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:39:19 -0800

131 lines

Four Quartets -- a reading experience

Chokh Raj

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:08:42 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

Naming - (was: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism)

Re: Naming - (was: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:42:48 -0800

38 lines

Naming - (was: Eliot on Charles Williams' mysticism)

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:27:40 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:45:33 -0800

55 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

David Boyd

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:53:51 +0000

123 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:17:08 -0600

52 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Terry Traynor

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:35:05 -0500

97 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:16:24 -0600

43 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

David Boyd

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:27:59 +0000

105 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:17:07 -0800

36 lines

Re: Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:10:11 -0800

32 lines

Off topic and off color - verb/preposition wordplay

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:54:05 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

old man

Re: old man

DIana Manister

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:16:20 -0500

69 lines

Re: old man

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:04:36 -0800

52 lines

Re: old man

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 03:53:15 -0800

50 lines

Re: old man

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:05:17 -0600

34 lines

Re: old man

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:37:00 -0800

71 lines

New Thread

Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:39:46 +0000

164 lines

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Richard Seddon

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:46:51 -0700

242 lines

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:18:14 +0000

213 lines

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Richard Seddon

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:10:30 -0700

297 lines

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 23:09:27 -0800

143 lines

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010

Kate Troy

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:05:57 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010]

Re: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010]

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:16:29 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

Ooops Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Re: Ooops Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:54:44 -0600

33 lines

Re: Ooops Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:19:26 -0500

26 lines

Ooops Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:39:55 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:57:10 -0500

285 lines

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

Jerome Walsh

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:25:09 -0800

99 lines

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:54:39 -0500

224 lines

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:57:11 -0500

154 lines

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:29:22 -0800

377 lines

Re: Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

David Boyd

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 10:31:04 +0000

252 lines

Origins of the relevant strain of Unitarianism as related to Eliot's family.

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:07:43 -0800

269 lines

New Thread

OT - Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Re: OT - Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:06:48 -0800

26 lines

OT - Re: Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:14:46 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

OT - Re: old man

Re: OT - Re: old man

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:21:06 -0800

52 lines

Re: OT - Re: old man

Richard Seddon

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:50:19 -0700

40 lines

OT - Re: old man

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:44:54 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

OT: "queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

OT: "queen" in Hebrew Bible; was Re: Eliot aand theVirgin Mary.

Jerome Walsh

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:00:53 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

OT: Re: signs and wonders

OT: Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:07:42 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

OT: William Arrowsmith

Re: OT: William Arrowsmith

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:02:42 -0500

1382 lines

Re: OT: William Arrowsmith

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:24:43 -0800

1313 lines

Re: OT: William Arrowsmith

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:22:45 -0800

1310 lines

Re: OT: William Arrowsmith

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:45:42 -0500

950 lines

Re: OT: William Arrowsmith

Diana Manister

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:21:11 -0500

1030 lines

OT: William Arrowsmith

Tom Colket

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:53:43 -0500

911 lines

New Thread

Pound & Dante

Re: Pound & Dante

Diana Manister

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:10:56 -0400

39 lines

Pound & Dante

Carrol Cox

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:02:11 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

signs and wonders

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:14:39 -0800

481 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Carrol Cox

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:41:21 -0500

49 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:21:45 +0000

354 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:44:34 -0800

142 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:39:17 -0800

75 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:22:46 -0800

125 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:59:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:30:57 -0400

80 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:39:57 -0600

16 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:54 -0400

156 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:05:08 -0400

73 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:04:12 -0400

113 lines

Re: signs and wonders

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:43:29 -0400

53 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:29:56 -0400

48 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:04:43 -0400

94 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:19:06 -0600

39 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Marcia Karp

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:49:42 -0400

76 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:03:02 -0800

28 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:52:29 -0800

525 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:27:31 -0800

137 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:21:26 -0800

204 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:42:18 -0800

43 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:34:17 -0800

40 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:18:44 -0400

26 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:21:19 -0600

184 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:11:33 -0400

15 lines

Re: signs and wonders

DIana Manister

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:39:08 -0400

282 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:11:50 -0600

25 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:00:18 -0400

28 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:34:39 -0400

34 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:18:56 -0600

269 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:45:12 -0700

44 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:32:35 -0400

146 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:31:57 -0600

213 lines

Re: signs and wonders

DIana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:26:09 -0400

139 lines

Re: signs and wonders

DIana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:16:07 -0400

463 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Ken Armstrong

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:17:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:45:40 -0400

135 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Richard Seddon

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:31:12 -0600

165 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:10:44 -0700

316 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:50:17 -0400

433 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:42:35 -0700

280 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:28:43 -0700

274 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:21:08 +0000

439 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:13:08 -0400

384 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:10:56 -0400

373 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:57:26 +0000

384 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:51:00 +0000

360 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:08:37 -0700

218 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:16:32 -0400

146 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:00:35 -0800

291 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:09:23 -0500

127 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:40:13 +0000

424 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:06:17 -0400

331 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:47:39 +0000

342 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:15:51 -0400

247 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:12:22 +0000

225 lines

Signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:56:47 +0000

191 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:53:50 +0000

240 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Carrol Cox

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:25:14 -0500

39 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:02:38 -0700

85 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:58:05 -0400

209 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:43:33 -0400

77 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Terry Traynor

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:22:36 -0400

100 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:35:27 +0000

356 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:05:08 -0500

215 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:39:43 -0500

102 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:19:06 -0500

163 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Terry Traynor

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:05:16 -0500

93 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:18:12 -0500

159 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Terry Traynor

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:53:52 -0500

80 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Diana Manister

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:06:15 +0000

298 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Nancy Gish

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:50:15 -0500

186 lines

Re: signs and wonders

DIana Manister

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:19:53 -0500

147 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:14:12 -0800

76 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Terry Traynor

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:56:23 -0500

96 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:37:29 -0500

19 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Carrol Cox

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:16:16 -0600

22 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Carrol Cox

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:58:57 -0600

28 lines

Re: signs and wonders

Jerome Walsh

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:55:36 -0800

42 lines

signs and wonders

Terry Traynor

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:29:48 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

T.S. Eliot, apparations and Scientific American

Re: T.S. Eliot, apparations and Scientific American

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:23:42 -0800

67 lines

Re: T.S. Eliot, apparations and Scientific American

DIana Manister

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:13:35 -0400

56 lines

T.S. Eliot, apparations and Scientific American

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:15:54 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

The late Pat Sloane

Re: The late Pat Sloane

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:33:15 -0800

124 lines

Re: The late Pat Sloane

David Boyd

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:34:22 +0100

91 lines

Re: The late Pat Sloane

Peter Dillane

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:51:21 +1100

37 lines

Re: The late Pat Sloane

Marcia Karp

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:44:39 -0400

28 lines

Re: The late Pat Sloane

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:57 -0400

34 lines

The late Pat Sloane

David Boyd

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:37:34 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

TS Eliot - Updates on Guardian, UK

Re: TS Eliot - Updates on Guardian, UK

Chokh Raj

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:01:38 -0800

55 lines

TS Eliot - Updates on Guardian, UK

Chokh Raj

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 04:54:19 -0800

106 lines

New Thread

Varieties of Conspiracy Theory

Varieties of Conspiracy Theory

Carrol Cox

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:42:13 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

William Arrowsmith

Re: William Arrowsmith

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:19:12 -0800

1258 lines

New Thread

Wm. Jamesian squabble--was Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Re: Wm. Jamesian squabble--was Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:57:41 +0000

1150 lines

Re: Wm. Jamesian squabble--was Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:47:58 -0500

978 lines

Wm. Jamesian squabble--was Christian Belief in Eliot's Pre-conversion Poetry

Nancy Gish

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:44:14 -0500

828 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010]

[Fwd: Omar Pound, September 10, 1926-March 2, 2010]

Carrol Cox

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:25:48 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Hurt Locker]

[Fwd: Re: [lbo-talk] Hurt Locker]

Carrol Cox

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:28:00 -0600

60 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager