LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Gerontion" (1 message)
'Gerontion' (18 messages)
'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc (64 messages)
'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc? (4 messages)
'Sweeney Agonistes' - a BBC production (3 messages)
99% OT (3 messages)
FW: notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas (1 message)
FW: ScanSafe Annual Global Threat Report 2009 (1 message)
FW: Wi-Fi Turns Rowdy Bus Into Rolling Study Hall (1 message)
FW: [IVLA] Call for Proposals for the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (1 message)
In depraved May ... (2 messages)
Interesting examples--Eliot and internationalism (1 message)
Literalism and Its Discontents (1 message)
Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion' (23 messages)
Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill (10 messages)
notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas (1 message)
Of Eliot's poetry - dreams & shadows (2 messages)
OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus? (12 messages)
On Valentine's Day (2 messages)
OT - 'Snowmageddon' (1 message)
OT - a poetic diversion (28 messages)
OT - Tea Party (21 messages)
OT - Word of the Day: eschew (1 message)
OT Handkerchiefs in TWL (1 message)
ot Weimar Shadows (3 messages)
Prufrock question (69 messages)
Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation) (74 messages)
Prufrock question - a few translations (4 messages)
Prufrock question turned obnoxious (16 messages)
Still OT: Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus? (1 message)
Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon" (29 messages)
Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading"Fragment of an Agon" (1 message)
Various. Prufrock and Dante, MP3 gift, technical talk (2 messages)
{Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question (17 messages)
{Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Gerontion"

Re: "Gerontion"

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:39:31 -0500

183 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion'

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:13:20 -0800

747 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:45:39 -0500

608 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:21:50 -0500

725 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:40:08 -0800

304 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:30:31 -0500

640 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:33:06 +0000

623 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:49:35 -0500

522 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:35:37 -0500

198 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:47:38 -0500

552 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:51:39 -0500

534 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:09:17 -0800

223 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:07:18 -0500

453 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:55:11 +0000

454 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:36:22 -0500

365 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:16:35 +0000

321 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:57:26 -0500

199 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:27:29 -0500

131 lines

Re: 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:11:45 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:07:09 -0500

123 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:01:37 -0500

735 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:37:26 -0500

784 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Tom Colket

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:33:17 -0500

700 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

George Carless

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:47:43 -0500

38 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:16:05 -0500

88 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:47:50 -0500

24 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:31:16 -0500

47 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:23:07 -0500

60 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:30:08 -0500

31 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:49:44 -0500

622 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:19:47 -0500

129 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:16:27 -0500

130 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:13:27 -0800

95 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:03:59 -0800

115 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:57:17 -0800

756 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:43:21 -0500

38 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:38:21 -0500

107 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:15:21 -0500

77 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:28:30 -0500

23 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:56:32 -0500

64 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:07:58 -0500

30 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:01:19 -0800

396 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:40:43 -0500

588 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Tom Colket

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:16:17 -0500

505 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:03:10 -0500

665 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:10:26 -0800

627 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Marcia Karp

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:59:44 -0500

99 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:53:27 -0800

106 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Marcia Karp

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:31:54 -0500

70 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:43 -0800

70 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:34:44 -0800

64 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:39:51 -0800

387 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:54:20 -0800

62 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:00:27 -0800

97 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:42:56 -0800

118 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:13:24 -0500

43 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:15:28 -0800

161 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:09:59 -0800

145 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:15:07 -0800

62 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:02:46 -0800

151 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:01:02 -0500

51 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:48:27 -0500

35 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:36:09 -0500

22 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:06:13 -0800

74 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:17:34 -0800

124 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:14:02 -0800

198 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:12:28 -0800

68 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:07:00 -0800

173 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Carrol Cox

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:05:37 -0600

43 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:59:03 -0500

108 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Diana Manister

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:38:45 +0000

84 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:04:39 -0500

18 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:09:04 -0800

99 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:44:50 -0500

169 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:42:10 -0500

116 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:38:21 -0500

164 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:24:05 -0500

139 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:23:08 -0800

138 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:57:07 -0800

76 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:41:03 -0500

60 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:20:05 -0500

59 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Nancy Gish

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:27:05 -0500

110 lines

'Gerontion' -- the dramatic arc

Chokh Raj

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:59:27 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc?

Re: 'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc?

Diana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:34:54 -0500

335 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc?

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:53:37 -0500

288 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc?

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:21:32 +0000

280 lines

Re: 'Gerontion' -- what dramatic arc?

Nancy Gish

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:54:11 -0500

214 lines

New Thread

'Sweeney Agonistes' - a BBC production

Re: 'Sweeney Agonistes' - a BBC production

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:24:10 +0000

129 lines

Re: 'Sweeney Agonistes' - a BBC production

Diana Manister

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:18:12 +0000

153 lines

'Sweeney Agonistes' - a BBC production

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:47:43 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

99% OT

Re: 99% OT

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:21:30 -0800

25 lines

Re: 99% OT

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:35:25 +0000

71 lines

99% OT

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:22:13 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

FW: notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas

FW: notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:31:46 -0800

76 lines

New Thread

FW: ScanSafe Annual Global Threat Report 2009

FW: ScanSafe Annual Global Threat Report 2009

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:41:40 -0800

145 lines

New Thread

FW: Wi-Fi Turns Rowdy Bus Into Rolling Study Hall

FW: Wi-Fi Turns Rowdy Bus Into Rolling Study Hall

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:42:39 -0800

106 lines

New Thread

FW: [IVLA] Call for Proposals for the Association of Educational Communications and Technology

FW: [IVLA] Call for Proposals for the Association of Educational Communications and Technology

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:32:11 -0800

228 lines

New Thread

In depraved May ...

Re: In depraved May ...

Chokh Raj

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:17:33 -0800

45 lines

In depraved May ...

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:19:33 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Interesting examples--Eliot and internationalism

Re: Interesting examples--Eliot and internationalism

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:01:35 -0800

102 lines

New Thread

Literalism and Its Discontents

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents

Marcia Karp

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:56:11 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:38:51 -0800

1226 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:34:34 -0800

805 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:06:30 -0500

569 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:36:11 -0500

859 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:39:05 -0500

53 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:26:41 -0500

459 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:39:10 -0500

676 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Marcia Karp

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:48:26 -0500

34 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:32:04 -0500

348 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:56:09 -0500

526 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:36:39 -0500

273 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:23:30 -0500

265 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Carrol Cox

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:52:06 -0600

214 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:46:10 -0500

440 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:27:02 +0000

434 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:47:08 -0500

274 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:28:09 -0500

193 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Diana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:29:58 -0500

113 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:44:45 -0500

91 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Nancy Gish

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:49:25 -0500

130 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

DIana Manister

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:48:30 -0500

62 lines

Re: Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Marcia Karp

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:38:38 -0500

47 lines

Literalism and Its Discontents, was 'Gerontion'

Carrol Cox

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:15:28 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

David Boyd

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:05:59 +0000

251 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

David Boyd

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:54:40 +0000

219 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Richard Seddon

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:40:53 -0700

86 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:56:33 -0500

63 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

David Boyd

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:58:03 +0000

165 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 01:34:45 -0800

38 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

David Boyd

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:05:06 +0000

170 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Richard Seddon

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:53:27 -0700

284 lines

Re: Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

David Boyd

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:21:08 +0000

74 lines

Mr. Bleistein at the Cannon Street Grill

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:44:24 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas

Re: notice of recent article on Ezra Pound's operas

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:38:36 +0000

94 lines

New Thread

Of Eliot's poetry - dreams & shadows

Re: Of Eliot's poetry - dreams & shadows

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:10:28 -0800

105 lines

Of Eliot's poetry - dreams & shadows

Chokh Raj

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:24:55 -0800

49 lines

New Thread

OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:46:09 -0800

117 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Diana Manister

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:38:33 +0000

205 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:24:57 -0800

88 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Diana Manister

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:32:24 -0500

80 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:48:07 -0800

66 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

DIana Manister

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:08:29 -0500

57 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

David Boyd

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:00:37 +0000

160 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:34:49 -0800

46 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Diana Manister

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:16:39 -0500

38 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:32:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

DIana Manister

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:32:25 -0500

86 lines

OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Tom Colket

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:48:57 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

On Valentine's Day

Re: On Valentine's Day

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:08:16 -0800

178 lines

On Valentine's Day

Chokh Raj

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:39:51 -0800

102 lines

New Thread

OT - 'Snowmageddon'

OT - 'Snowmageddon'

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:09:09 -0800

91 lines

New Thread

OT - a poetic diversion

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Carrol Cox

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:07:45 -0600

20 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:12:54 -0800

285 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:07:37 -0800

172 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:42:07 -0500

255 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:19:09 -0800

239 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:18:11 -0500

35 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:00:48 -0500

189 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:35:58 -0800

186 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:28:55 -0500

158 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:19:43 -0800

91 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:49:22 -0800

151 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Diana Manister

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:47:16 -0500

70 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:04:18 -0800

53 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Marcia Karp

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:38:29 -0500

45 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Diana Manister

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:41:22 -0500

41 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:37:34 -0500

25 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Marcia Karp

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:58:40 -0500

53 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:41:36 -0500

57 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:21:14 -0800

93 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Nancy Gish

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:56:35 -0500

110 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Marcia Karp

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:04:26 -0500

68 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:27:45 -0800

40 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:40:20 -0800

20 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:59:11 -0800

158 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:07:07 -0800

85 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:28:30 -0800

137 lines

Re: OT - a poetic diversion

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:54:50 -0800

393 lines

OT - a poetic diversion

Chokh Raj

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:43:05 -0800

49 lines

New Thread

OT - Tea Party

Re: OT - Tea Party

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:38:45 -0800

96 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:11:41 -0800

116 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:47:38 -0800

37 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:16:24 +0000

280 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:56:11 -0500

98 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 06:12:27 -0800

24 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 04:12:19 -0800

349 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 01:44:43 -0800

75 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 01:43:22 -0800

64 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:49:39 -0800

44 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Chokh Raj

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:27:15 -0800

67 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:43:11 -0500

42 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

DIana Manister

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:18:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Chokh Raj

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 07:02:10 -0800

21 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:43:00 -0500

211 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Carrol Cox

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:33:35 -0600

93 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

DIana Manister

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:39:03 -0500

247 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:26:19 -0500

220 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 00:04:16 -0800

235 lines

Re: OT - Tea Party

Nancy Gish

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 19:30:15 -0500

134 lines

OT - Tea Party

Chokh Raj

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:21:04 -0800

106 lines

New Thread

OT - Word of the Day: eschew

OT - Word of the Day: eschew

Chokh Raj

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:10:00 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

OT Handkerchiefs in TWL

OT Handkerchiefs in TWL

Diana Manister

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:43:00 +0000

112 lines

New Thread

ot Weimar Shadows

Re: ot Weimar Shadows

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 20:51:22 -0600

46 lines

Re: ot Weimar Shadows

Diana Manister

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:20:51 +0000

79 lines

ot Weimar Shadows

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:38:41 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

Prufrock question

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:19:51 -0800

238 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:13:26 -0800

135 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:32:58 -0800

48 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:11:08 -0800

29 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:31:56 -0800

140 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:07:08 -0800

60 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:32:14 -0500

111 lines

Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 09:10:22 -0500

96 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:57:45 -0500

279 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:48:57 -0500

221 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Tom Colket

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:08:48 -0500

211 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:22:16 -0800

194 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:17:55 -0800

133 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:02:10 -0800

119 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:05:34 -0800

100 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:34:49 -0800

106 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:26:44 -0800

39 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Carrol Cox

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:44:02 -0600

22 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Marcia Karp

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:10:53 -0500

39 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:26:17 -0800

309 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:20:19 -0800

240 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:52:12 -0800

58 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 03:50:05 -0800

134 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:12:52 +0000

90 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:04:58 -0500

22 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:54:56 -0500

49 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:02:05 -0800

132 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:35:36 -0800

199 lines

Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:37:59 -0500

72 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:29:37 -0500

156 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:40:12 -0500

64 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:13:15 -0500

121 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:51:16 -0800

146 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:55:51 -0800

107 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:31:24 -0800

38 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:59:33 -0500

91 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:59:33 -0500

91 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:55:50 -0500

72 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:59:24 -0800

31 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:48:55 -0800

67 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:34:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Carrol Cox

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:27:16 -0600

28 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:04:27 -0500

97 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Carrol Cox

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:34:12 -0600

31 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:10:13 -0500

434 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:02:27 -0500

139 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:53:01 -0500

119 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:22:12 -0800

148 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:20:40 -0800

41 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:16:47 -0800

194 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:14:54 -0800

61 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:12:27 -0800

138 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:11:07 -0800

550 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:04:22 -0800

53 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:38:13 +0000

106 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Carrol Cox

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:27:13 -0600

23 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:03:25 -0500

527 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:06:54 +0000

144 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:53:32 +0000

484 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:06:41 -0500

83 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:03:51 -0500

386 lines

Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:04:11 -0500

36 lines

Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:59:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:55:13 -0500

259 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:23:26 -0800

20 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:16:48 -0800

114 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:50:19 -0800

36 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:40:09 -0800

35 lines

Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:09:51 -0800

165 lines

New Thread

Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:19:02 -0800

139 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:09:08 -0800

783 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:08:02 -0800

793 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:05:07 -0800

46 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:12:25 -0500

130 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:57:16 -0500

56 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:20:25 -0600

86 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:15:18 -0500

91 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:07:14 -0600

39 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:31:33 +0000

700 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:59:43 -0500

652 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:37:24 +0000

634 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:55:20 -0500

562 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:58:43 -0500

518 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:17:27 -0800

202 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:50:05 -0500

28 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:38:41 -0800

717 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:33:28 -0800

708 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:22:43 +0000

545 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Tom Colket

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:20:02 -0500

560 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:21:05 +0000

112 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:14:49 +0000

370 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:51:28 -0500

500 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:00:43 -0600

30 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:47:36 -0500

440 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:45:25 -0800

199 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:08:46 -0500

179 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Tom Colket

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:47:27 -0500

281 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:06:27 -0800

107 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:31:26 -0500

87 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:21:43 -0800

22 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:41:25 +0000

136 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:32:21 -0500

90 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:12:41 -0500

255 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:12:27 -0600

101 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:09:31 -0500

173 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

George Carless

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:36:37 -0500

29 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:50:14 +0000

241 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:40:19 +0000

227 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:35:11 -0800

101 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:27:57 +0000

162 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:27:01 -0500

125 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:18:45 -0500

132 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:53:23 -0600

49 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

George Carless

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:04:23 -0500

38 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:26:01 +0000

194 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:24:00 -0800

29 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:18:40 -0800

73 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Diana Manister

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:01:01 +0000

167 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:56:54 -0800

71 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:51:14 -0500

110 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:14:06 -0600

33 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:07:07 -0800

225 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 01:05:22 -0800

388 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:57:14 -0800

43 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Tom Colket

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 03:23:43 -0500

247 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:16:45 -0800

135 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 20:44:15 -0800

216 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 23:06:57 -0500

181 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Carrol Cox

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:35:48 -0600

74 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:35:09 -0800

143 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Nancy Gish

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:41:35 -0500

94 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 18:08:04 -0500

28 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 01:47:26 -0800

17 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:08:38 -0500

37 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Marcia Karp

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:43:37 -0500

82 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:30:57 -0800

109 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:24:28 -0800

268 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Marcia Karp

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:13:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Chokh Raj

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:11:08 -0800

153 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:32:00 -0800

76 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:50:58 -0500

33 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:57:17 -0800

70 lines

Re: Prufrock question (Eliot interview citation)

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:42:59 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Prufrock question - a few translations

Re: Prufrock question - a few translations

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:45:59 -0500

133 lines

Re: Prufrock question - a few translations

Diana Manister

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:45:57 +0000

331 lines

Re: Prufrock question - a few translations

Nancy Gish

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:38:27 -0500

329 lines

Re: Prufrock question - a few translations

Diana Manister

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:27:37 +0000

269 lines

New Thread

Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:45:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Marcia Karp

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:00:41 -0500

12 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Diana Manister

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:00:07 +0000

90 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:40:50 -0800

41 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:34:14 -0800

30 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Richard Seddon

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:43:36 -0700

19 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

George Carless

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:17:54 -0500

23 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

George Carless

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:17:21 -0500

22 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:36:37 -0800

171 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:43:28 +0000

123 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:41:29 +0000

125 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:23:26 -0800

47 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:22:05 -0800

45 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:58:41 -0500

38 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

DIana Manister

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:54:05 -0500

37 lines

Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious

Marcia Karp

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:49:41 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Still OT: Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Still OT: Re: OFF-TOPIC: Can an MP3 file contain a virus?

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:16:38 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:08:24 -0800

455 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

DIana Manister

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:32:43 -0500

231 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:12:32 -0500

353 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:01:38 -0500

229 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:27:59 -0800

222 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:24:23 -0800

340 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Diana Manister

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:46:28 +0000

162 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:07:53 -0500

129 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Diana Manister

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:14:17 +0000

87 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Ken Armstrong

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:52:00 -0500

21 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Diana Manister

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:14:31 -0500

111 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Chokh Raj

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:01:37 -0800

26 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:15:33 -0500

254 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:51:29 -0800

230 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:37:35 -0800

162 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:51:05 -0500

97 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Chokh Raj

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:17:08 -0800

147 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:57:14 -0500

243 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:15:15 -0800

193 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Chokh Raj

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:23:38 -0800

45 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Ken Armstrong

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:13:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Nancy Gish

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:56:21 -0500

303 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:22:35 -0500

277 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Carol Cates Parker

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:05:22 -0500

137 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:02:35 -0800

270 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

George Carless

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:49:15 -0500

126 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Marcia Karp

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:49:30 -0500

52 lines

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Chokh Raj

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:03:28 -0800

260 lines

Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading "Fragment of an Agon"

Tom Colket

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:18:37 -0500

88908 lines

New Thread

Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading"Fragment of an Agon"

Re: Valentine's gift to the TSE list: MP3 recording of Eliot reading"Fragment of an Agon"

Carrol Cox

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:11:48 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Various. Prufrock and Dante, MP3 gift, technical talk

Re: Various. Prufrock and Dante, MP3 gift, technical talk

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:00:55 -0800

104 lines

Various. Prufrock and Dante, MP3 gift, technical talk

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:57:55 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

{Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

DIana Manister

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:43:21 -0500

514 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:39:04 -0800

530 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:37:48 -0800

339 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:56:26 +0000

368 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:03 +0000

257 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:52:51 +0000

246 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:49:16 -0800

445 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:39:57 -0800

256 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:14:59 -0500

102 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:52:42 +0000

315 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Diana Manister

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:49:27 +0000

205 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:33:04 -0800

353 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:30:47 -0800

137 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:49:43 -0800

209 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:44:30 -0500

69 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:11:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:18:48 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

{Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Re: {Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Chokh Raj

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:28:41 -0800

192 lines

Re: {Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: Prufrock question

Nancy Gish

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:14:18 -0500

274 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager