LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TSE Archives


TSE Archives

TSE Archives


March 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

About Women (42 messages)
About Women -- OT The Bayeux Tapestry (1 message)
blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot) (4 messages)
Coherence in TWL (68 messages)
Coherence in TWL (Was: 'on Tiresias and "ghastly" ') (3 messages)
Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women (4 messages)
Coherence in TWL and Portrayal of Women (1 message)
Correction Re: Of any interest? (3 messages)
Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject) (15 messages)
Eliot - Melvyn Bragg (1 message)
Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context (10 messages)
Further to the question of wide social appeal of expression of artistically rendered personal experience (1 message)
Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (2 messages)
FW: Online courses and how they change the nature of class (1 message)
Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (1 message)
Gerontion (7 messages)
GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list (7 messages)
Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL) (25 messages)
In the mountains (was: Gerontion) (8 messages)
John Peter's "Postscript" essay (4 messages)
Landscapes by T S Eliot (30 messages)
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (1 message)
Mostly Lastly etc. (1 message)
Mostly OT: For the dimly lit (2 messages)
Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The (19 messages)
O.T.: What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem? (1 message)
Of any interest? (15 messages)
On Nicholas Hughes - Daily Mail UK (3 messages)
on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a name? (2 messages)
on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a nom d'plume (1 message)
on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime,was what's in a name? (1 message)
OT (mainly) - Lilac arrangement (3 messages)
OT - Bombing of cities in WWI (3 messages)
OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden (6 messages)
OT About Women and art (1 message)
OT Depression (3 messages)
Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women (4 messages)
Slanders on Movements--or what is the issue? (1 message)
Soldiers (2 messages)
Stevens' 'Thirteen Ways' (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot) (2 messages)
Tao Te Ching #1 (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot) (3 messages)
The Bullshit and the Garden (20 messages)
The female dimension of pain (1 message)
The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land (1 message)
The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land (Revised) (2 messages)
The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised] (7 messages)
To change the subject (31 messages)
TS Eliot - a St. Louis Video (2 messages)
typo---Sorry!!! Coherence in TWL (1 message)
universal elements or the catholic view (2 messages)
Well--mail scanner (1 message)
What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem? (1 message)
Whitman allusions in TWL (1 message)
WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation" (1 message)
WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation" (1 message)
{Disarmed} Re: The Bullshit and the Garden (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TSE Home

TSE Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

About Women

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:54:30 -0400

1101 lines

Re: About Women

Diana Manister

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:22:58 +0000

134 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:40:13 -0400

98 lines

Re: About Women

Diana Manister

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:31:21 +0000

1101 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:27:38 EDT

941 lines

Re: About Women

Charles McElwain

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:54:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:25:45 -0500

690 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:13:40 -0400

737 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:42:25 EDT

876 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:15:58 -0400

623 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:15:45 -0400

694 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:48:37 EDT

786 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:15:58 -0400

623 lines

Re: About Women

Diana Manister

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:04:29 +0000

610 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:03:58 -0400

523 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:59:07 EDT

621 lines

Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:00:37 -0500

107 lines

Re: About Women

Diana Manister

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:42:41 +0000

449 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:54:53 EDT

442 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:09:24 -0400

344 lines

Re: About Women

Diana Manister

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:41:21 +0000

334 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:04:11 -0400

96 lines

Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:44:14 -0500

17 lines

Re: About Women

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:06:36 -0800

215 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:50:09 -0400

442 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:54:54 EDT

445 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:47:23 EDT

442 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:23:28 -0400

315 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:14:20 -0400

294 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:58:32 EDT

326 lines

Re: About Women

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:04:39 -0400

129 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:45:43 -0400

238 lines

Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:12:37 -0500

24 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:06:16 EDT

254 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:54:54 EDT

265 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:24:26 -0400

187 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:48:27 EDT

169 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:30:55 -0400

110 lines

Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:45:56 -0500

43 lines

Re: About Women

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:20:00 -0400

96 lines

Re: About Women

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:09:01 -0800

156 lines

Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:35:02 EDT

56 lines

New Thread

About Women -- OT The Bayeux Tapestry

Re: About Women -- OT The Bayeux Tapestry

Diana Manister

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:43:24 +0000

1241 lines

New Thread

blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Re: blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Nancy Gish

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 22:21:59 -0500

188 lines

Re: blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

robert meyer

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:33:52 -0800

94 lines

Re: blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Nancy Gish

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:47:21 -0500

111 lines

Re: blackbird in Malory (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

robert meyer

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:33:48 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

Coherence in TWL

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:19:17 +0000

637 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Tom Colket

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:49:19 -0400

722 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:34:34 -0400

603 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:21:12 +0000

543 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:10:23 +0000

804 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:35:53 -0800

242 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:29:13 -0800

166 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Chokh Raj

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:46:49 -0700

125 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Chokh Raj

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:36:45 -0700

71 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:58:38 -0400

620 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:22:44 -0400

358 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:22:59 -0400

493 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:00:15 -0800

472 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:35:54 -0800

263 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:01:59 -0400

692 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

David Boyd

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:44:11 +0000

719 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:44:31 -0500

47 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:11:30 -0400

669 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:48:53 +0000

625 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:16:17 -0400

521 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:48:39 +0000

111 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:44:55 +0000

472 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:11:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:55:34 -0400

446 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:25:14 +0000

392 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:52:33 -0400

198 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:04:33 -0800

64 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:53:22 -0800

147 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:49:32 -0800

40 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:33:54 -0400

345 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:13:25 +0000

294 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:39:01 -0500

31 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:12:24 -0400

245 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:05:00 -0400

132 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:57:52 -0400

75 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:48:45 -0400

57 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:37:44 +0000

207 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:14:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:48:42 -0400

141 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:21:21 +0000

87 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:17:35 +0000

140 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:15:50 -0800

223 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:39:36 -0400

133 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:33:56 -0800

58 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:24:57 -0800

71 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:15:26 -0800

43 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:04:50 -0800

297 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:19:04 -0400

24 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:15:40 -0400

44 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:31:44 -0500

46 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:21:58 -0500

24 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:54:27 +0000

280 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:04:19 -0500

74 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:48:30 +0000

202 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:29:40 -0800

356 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:06:10 -0800

51 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:36:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Peter Dillane

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:06 +1000

23 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:32:32 -0500

38 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Carrol Cox

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:25:57 -0500

110 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:41:41 -0400

216 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:36:47 -0400

179 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Diana Manister

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:40:17 +0000

176 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL

Tom Colket

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:45:57 -0400

123 lines

Re: coherence in twl

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:31:55 -0800

57 lines

Re: coherence in twl

Carrol Cox

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:42:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: coherence in twl

Carrol Cox

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:29:33 -0500

42 lines

coherence in twl

Richard Seddon

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:40:51 -0600

144 lines

New Thread

Coherence in TWL (Was: 'on Tiresias and "ghastly" ')

Re: Coherence in TWL (Was: 'on Tiresias and "ghastly" ')

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:25:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL (Was: 'on Tiresias and "ghastly" ')

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:56:03 -0600

109 lines

Coherence in TWL (Was: 'on Tiresias and "ghastly" ')

Tom Colket

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:38:11 -0400

239 lines

New Thread

Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women

Re: Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women

Carrol Cox

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:14:39 -0500

20 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women

Kate Troy

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:57 EDT

285 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women

Nancy Gish

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:55:13 -0400

178 lines

Re: Coherence in TWL and Eliot's Portraits of Women

Kate Troy

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:44 EDT

189 lines

New Thread

Coherence in TWL and Portrayal of Women

Re: Coherence in TWL and Portrayal of Women

Kate Troy

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:21:38 EDT

162 lines

New Thread

Correction Re: Of any interest?

Re: Correction Re: Of any interest?

Carrol Cox

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:43:46 -0500

57 lines

Re: Correction Re: Of any interest?

Nancy Gish

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:31:38 -0400

84 lines

Correction Re: Of any interest?

Carrol Cox

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:51:36 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:19:12 -0700

116 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:16:31 +0000

94 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:08:59 -0500

22 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:51:37 +0000

152 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Carrol Cox

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:01:53 -0500

42 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:11:03 +0000

242 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:02:02 -0700

122 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:08:43 -0400

245 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:46:50 -0700

340 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:37:34 -0400

154 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Carrol Cox

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:36:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Nancy Gish

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:08:52 -0400

224 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:47:19 -0700

167 lines

Re: Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Nancy Gish

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:47:19 -0400

130 lines

Criticism of poet/poetry (Was Re: To change the subject)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:23:19 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Eliot - Melvyn Bragg

Eliot - Melvyn Bragg

mikemail

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:46:21 +0300

356103 lines

New Thread

Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Marcia Karp

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:17:30 -0500

88 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 03:42:04 -0800

223 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Chokh Raj

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:10:35 -0800

95 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Chokh Raj

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:06:34 -0800

95 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Terry O'Grady

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:40:34 EST

54 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Nancy Gish

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:27:09 -0500

80 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Marcia Karp

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:01:20 -0500

40 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Chokh Raj

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:33:14 -0800

107 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Chokh Raj

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:52:10 -0800

308 lines

Re: Eliot's 'Usk' - the text and the context

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:58:19 -0800

443 lines

New Thread

Further to the question of wide social appeal of expression of artistically rendered personal experience

Further to the question of wide social appeal of expression of artistically rendered personal experience

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:19:27 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:49:27 -0800

18 lines

Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:33:16 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

FW: Online courses and how they change the nature of class

FW: Online courses and how they change the nature of class

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:58:42 -0700

96 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:59:04 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Gerontion

Re: Gerontion

Tom Colket

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:04:59 -0400

387 lines

Re: Gerontion

Diana Manister

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:07:43 +0000

226 lines

Re: Gerontion

Diana Manister

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:52:33 +0000

163 lines

Re: Gerontion

Carrol Cox

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:03:25 -0500

83 lines

Re: Gerontion

Carrol Cox

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:46:53 -0500

46 lines

Re: Gerontion

Nancy Gish

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:11:25 -0400

196 lines

Gerontion

Carrol Cox

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:35:37 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Ken Armstrong

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:58:33 -0400

70 lines

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Peter Dillane

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:53:37 +1000

161 lines

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Nancy Gish

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:26:20 -0400

106 lines

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:19:18 -0400

52 lines

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Peter Dillane

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:57:05 +1000

207 lines

Re: GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Marcia Karp

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:15:16 -0400

90 lines

GoogleAdSense Service for the TSE list

Timothy Materer

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:34:02 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:34:03 -0800

509 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

David Boyd

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:18:55 +0000

391 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:03:48 -0400

97 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Marcia Karp

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:04:18 -0400

86 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:14:26 -0400

65 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:12:49 -0400

295 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:40:54 +0000

250 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

David Boyd

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:54:30 +0000

193 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:26:13 +0000

84 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:02:23 -0400

50 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:42:26 +0000

144 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Rickard A. Parker

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:40:03 -0400

17 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:25:42 -0400

27 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:16:12 +0000

972 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:02:21 -0400

1141 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:50:22 +0000

681 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

David Boyd

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:56:57 +0000

673 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

David Boyd

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:49:46 +0000

820 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:00:17 -0400

770 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

David Boyd

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:10:15 +0000

362 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Diana Manister

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:19:54 +0000

303 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:28:57 -0400

904 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:53:12 -0400

554 lines

Re: Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:30:58 -0400

1310 lines

Help with WWI Syllabus? (Was RE: Coherence in TWL)

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:00:12 -0400

493 lines

New Thread

In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:18:55 +0000

168 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Nancy Gish

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:05:38 -0400

149 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Rickard A. Parker

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:33:32 -0400

73 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:21:27 +0000

341 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:16:45 +0000

315 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Chokh Raj

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:41:03 -0700

76 lines

Re: In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:15:19 -0800

185 lines

In the mountains (was: Gerontion)

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:26:55 -0400

172 lines

New Thread

John Peter's "Postscript" essay

Re: John Peter's "Postscript" essay

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:32:42 -0400

32 lines

Re: John Peter's "Postscript" essay

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:26:08 -0400

32 lines

Re: John Peter's "Postscript" essay

Chokh Raj

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:38:34 -0700

173 lines

John Peter's "Postscript" essay

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:16:55 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Landscapes by T S Eliot

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:51:33 -0500

120 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:25:53 -0500

34 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Ken Armstrong

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:04:43 -0500

54 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Carrol Cox

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:58:44 -0600

27 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

CR Mittal

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 06:24:03 -0800

196 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 04:07:22 -0800

169 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Marcia Karp

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:01:59 -0500

46 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:24:46 -0500

56 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Carrol Cox

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:52:27 -0600

21 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Marcia Karp

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:58:36 -0500

172 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Chokh Raj

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 05:02:41 -0800

79 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

CR Mittal

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 04:18:10 -0800

135 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:15:44 -0800

208 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:04:35 -0800

290 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:56:05 -0800

147 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 00:07:41 -0500

235 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Marcia Karp

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:52:26 -0500

197 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:15:35 -0500

150 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:28:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:29:09 -0500

209 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Chokh Raj

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:39:00 -0800

157 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Nancy Gish

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:42:30 -0500

128 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Chokh Raj

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:06:13 -0800

59 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Carrol Cox

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:11:44 -0600

21 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Marcia Karp

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:12:15 -0500

75 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Chokh Raj

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:36:13 -0800

48 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Chokh Raj

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:05:33 -0800

150 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:49:24 -0500

54 lines

Re: Landscapes by T S Eliot

Marcia Karp

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:19:55 -0500

52 lines

Landscapes by T S Eliot

CR Mittal

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:32:06 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

mikemail

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:13:30 +0300

137 lines

New Thread

Mostly Lastly etc.

Re: Mostly Lastly etc.

Ken Armstrong

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:49:12 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Mostly OT: For the dimly lit

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit

Diana Manister

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:51:36 +0000

134 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit

Marcia Karp

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:36:38 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:48:23 -0400

80 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Tom Colket

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:29:42 -0400

244 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Chokh Raj

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:18:16 -0700

117 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:21:36 -0800

658 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:17:29 -0800

613 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:09:38 -0400

246 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Diana Manister

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:02:43 +0000

463 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Chokh Raj

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:56:09 -0700

415 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Chokh Raj

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:31:50 -0700

344 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Tom Colket

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:09:04 -0400

268 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:44:42 -0800

195 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:41:09 -0800

159 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Nancy Gish

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:50:51 -0400

134 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Chokh Raj

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:18:35 -0700

88 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

David Boyd

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:21:52 +0000

195 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Gunnar Jauch

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:10:12 +0100

189 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

David Boyd

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:29:10 +0000

127 lines

Re: Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:57:58 -0600

33 lines

Mostly OT: For the dimly lit: Re: The

Ken Armstrong

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:25:41 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

O.T.: What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem?

O.T.: What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem?

Gunnar Jauch

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:41:54 +0100

414 lines

New Thread

Of any interest?

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:39:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:20:44 -0800

349 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:11:19 -0400

33 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:29:43 -0700

58 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:00:19 -0400

35 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:50:58 -0400

22 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Nancy Gish

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:23:57 -0400

324 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Chokh Raj

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:55:51 -0700

239 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:13:25 -0600

27 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:11:33 -0600

28 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:08:52 -0600

51 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Carrol Cox

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:37:52 -0500

31 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Nancy Gish

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:49:18 -0400

109 lines

Re: Of any interest?

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:40:05 -0400

35 lines

Of any interest?

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:57:07 -0800

74 lines

New Thread

On Nicholas Hughes - Daily Mail UK

Re: On Nicholas Hughes - Daily Mail UK

Kate Troy

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:54:35 EDT

8777 lines

Re: On Nicholas Hughes - Daily Mail UK

Nancy Gish

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:39:56 -0400

649 lines

On Nicholas Hughes - Daily Mail UK

mikemail

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:16:18 +0300

8335 lines

New Thread

on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a name?

Re: on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a name?

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 03:03:23 -0800

97 lines

Re: on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a name?

Peter Montgomery

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:35:59 -0800

87 lines

New Thread

on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a nom d'plume

Re: on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime, was what's in a nom d'plume

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 03:01:09 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime,was what's in a name?

Re: on Tiresias and "ghastly"--Typist Home at teatime,was what's in a name?

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:42:40 -0800

76 lines

New Thread

OT (mainly) - Lilac arrangement

Re: OT (mainly) - Lilac arrangement

Chokh Raj

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:21:55 -0700

85 lines

Re: OT (mainly) - Lilac arrangement

Carrol Cox

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:54:14 -0500

23 lines

OT (mainly) - Lilac arrangement

Rickard A. Parker

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:13:33 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

OT - Bombing of cities in WWI

Re: OT - Bombing of cities in WWI

Diana Manister

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:03:27 +0000

313 lines

Re: OT - Bombing of cities in WWI

David Boyd

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:12:46 +0000

96 lines

OT - Bombing of cities in WWI

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:38:49 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Re: OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:35:04 -0600

70 lines

Re: OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

CR Mittal

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:36:30 -0700

152 lines

Re: OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Ken Armstrong

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:01:03 -0400

55 lines

Re: OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Carrol Cox

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:05:30 -0500

43 lines

Re: OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:11:38 -0400

75 lines

OT - Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Rickard A. Parker

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:39:30 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

OT About Women and art

OT About Women and art

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:37:41 -0400

423 lines

New Thread

OT Depression

Re: OT Depression

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:38:00 +0000

134 lines

Re: OT Depression

Carrol Cox

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:25:29 -0500

28 lines

OT Depression

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:55:42 +0000

254 lines

New Thread

Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women

Re: Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:42:26 -0800

359 lines

Re: Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:36:00 EDT

228 lines

Re: Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women

Kate Troy

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:32:23 EDT

200 lines

Slanders on Movements, was Re: About Women

Carrol Cox

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:17:33 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Slanders on Movements--or what is the issue?

Slanders on Movements--or what is the issue?

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:55:49 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

Soldiers

Re: Soldiers

David Boyd

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:23:07 +0000

101 lines

Soldiers

Marcia Karp

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:34:43 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Stevens' 'Thirteen Ways' (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Re: Stevens' 'Thirteen Ways' (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Chokh Raj

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:27:25 -0700

48 lines

Re: Stevens' 'Thirteen Ways' (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Chokh Raj

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:54:02 -0800

130 lines

New Thread

Tao Te Ching #1 (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Re: Tao Te Ching #1 (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

Gunnar Jauch

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:33:26 +0100

415 lines

Re: Tao Te Ching #1 (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

CR Mittal

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:07:02 -0800

62 lines

Tao Te Ching #1 (was: Landscapes by T S Eliot)

robert meyer

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:40:51 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

The Bullshit and the Garden

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Gunnar Jauch

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:45:01 +0100

229 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Chokh Raj

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:02:59 -0700

103 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

David Boyd

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:37:52 +0000

75 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Chokh Raj

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:11:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:50:42 -0600

28 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:49:32 -0600

10 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Nancy Gish

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:47:33 -0400

225 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Chokh Raj

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:11:06 -0700

138 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Nancy Gish

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:10:18 -0400

96 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Swaran Singh

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:28:23 +0530

32 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Carrol Cox

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:58:31 -0500

22 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:07:35 -0600

53 lines

The Bullshit and the Garden

David Boyd

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:28:30 +0000

133 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

David Boyd

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:26:08 +0000

133 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Chokh Raj

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:38:17 -0700

81 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:17:36 -0800

38 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:15:06 -0800

175 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Rickard A. Parker

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:50:41 -0400

20 lines

Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:20:55 -0400

107 lines

The Bullshit and the Garden

CR Mittal

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:09:29 -0700

77 lines

New Thread

The female dimension of pain

The female dimension of pain

CR Mittal

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:47:50 -0700

101 lines

New Thread

The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:45:07 -0700

137 lines

New Thread

The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land (Revised)

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land (Revised)

Marcia Karp

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:20:10 -0400

43 lines

The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land (Revised)

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:57:22 -0700

127 lines

New Thread

The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:50:53 -0700

56 lines

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Nancy Gish

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:39:31 -0400

87 lines

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Marcia Karp

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:47:45 -0400

42 lines

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Carrol Cox

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:14:43 -0500

14 lines

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:56:26 -0700

85 lines

Re: The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Marcia Karp

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:45:17 -0400

46 lines

The female dimension of pain in The Waste Land [Revised]

Chokh Raj

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:35:16 -0700

225 lines

New Thread

To change the subject

Re: To change the subject

Kate Troy

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:50:59 EDT

279 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:38:59 +0000

78 lines

Re: To change the subject

Carrol Cox

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:30:05 -0500

22 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:27:58 +0000

511 lines

Re: To change the subject

David Boyd

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:27:31 +0100

447 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:03:11 +0000

397 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:42:59 -0400

346 lines

Re: To change the subject

Carrol Cox

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:24:19 -0500

48 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:30:46 +0000

319 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:13:46 +0000

101 lines

Re: To change the subject

Carrol Cox

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:04:44 -0500

24 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:45:16 +0000

345 lines

Re: To change the subject

Kate Troy

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:59:06 EDT

340 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:16:04 -0400

307 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:14:19 +0000

277 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:05:38 +0000

230 lines

Re: To change the subject

Kate Troy

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:00:50 EDT

385 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:46:10 -0400

241 lines

Re: To change the subject

Kate Troy

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:24:31 EDT

217 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:19:29 +0000

173 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:48:22 +0000

415 lines

Re: To change the subject

Kate Troy

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:13:05 EDT

87 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:17:20 -0400

415 lines

Re: To change the subject

Chokh Raj

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:51:10 -0700

38 lines

Re: To change the subject

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:05:34 -0400

227 lines

Re: To change the subject

Chokh Raj

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:32:04 -0700

39 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:18:26 -0400

340 lines

Re: To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:12:29 -0400

324 lines

Re: To change the subject

O'Sullivan, Brian P

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:54:03 -0400

191 lines

Re: To change the subject

Diana Manister

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:20:59 +0000

285 lines

To change the subject

Nancy Gish

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:13:12 -0400

222 lines

New Thread

TS Eliot - a St. Louis Video

Re: TS Eliot - a St. Louis Video

Peter Montgomery

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:11:13 -0800

46 lines

TS Eliot - a St. Louis Video

CR Mittal

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:31:25 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

typo---Sorry!!! Coherence in TWL

typo---Sorry!!! Coherence in TWL

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:16:42 -0400

625 lines

New Thread

universal elements or the catholic view

Re: universal elements or the catholic view

Chokh Raj

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:05:22 -0700

187 lines

Re: universal elements or the catholic view

Peter Montgomery

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:15:53 -0800

215 lines

New Thread

Well--mail scanner

Well--mail scanner

Nancy Gish

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:30:49 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem?

What do you think about the importance of Isael or Jerusalem?

Laura Close

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:17 -0400

492 lines

New Thread

Whitman allusions in TWL

Whitman allusions in TWL

Rickard A. Parker

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:57:31 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation"

WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation"

Rickard A. Parker

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:21:05 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation"

Re: WWI and T.S.Eliot’s Letter to "The Nation"

Diana Manister

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:19:38 +0000

196 lines

New Thread

{Disarmed} Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Re: {Disarmed} Re: The Bullshit and the Garden

Nancy Gish

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:03:36 -0400

182 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



PO.MISSOURI.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager