|
|
|
Size
|
Re: (OT) Internet : an overkill ?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:30:32 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: (OT) Internet : an overkill ?
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:23:48 -0600 |
17 lines |
Re: (OT) Internet : an overkill ?
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:42:44 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: (OT) Psychoanalysing George Bush !
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:38:09 -0800 |
139 lines |
Re: (OT) Psychoanalysing George Bush !
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:28:43 -0600 |
66 lines |
(OT) Psychoanalysing George Bush !
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:47:51 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: (VERY MUCH NOT OFF TOPIC) Psychoanalysing George Bush !
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:32:37 -0800 |
123 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:14:33 -0500 |
326 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:27:01 -0500 |
312 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:21:16 -0500 |
327 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:11:38 -0800 |
277 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:13:29 -0800 |
238 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:46:35 -0500 |
57 lines |
A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:17:17 -0500 |
145 lines |
A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy, was 'Touchstone'
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:05:36 -0800 |
79 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:19:35 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:47:51 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:07:18 -0500 |
86 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:30:12 -0500 |
68 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:59:51 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:52:30 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:23:03 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was 'Touchstone'
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:43:05 -0600 |
37 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was'Touchstone'
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:25:53 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: A little evidence wouldn't go amiss: a note to Nancy,was'Touchstone'
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:28:45 -0600 |
51 lines |
Re: Another Story on the Second Volume of the Eliot Letters
|
Cassandra Laity |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:23:55 -0500 |
40 lines |
Another Story on the Second Volume of the Eliot Letters
|
Tom Gray |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:53:28 -0800 |
18 lines |
CFP for MSA-Chicago
|
Cassandra Laity |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:35:14 -0500 |
291 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:55:15 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:47:36 -0800 |
258 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:06:37 -0800 |
273 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:04:12 -0800 |
205 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:43:01 -0600 |
159 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:44:33 -0600 |
18 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:14:04 -0800 |
211 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:41:39 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:03:01 -0800 |
54 lines |
Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:53:29 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:04:14 EST |
430 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:32:36 -0800 |
216 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:37:35 -0800 |
279 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Tabitha Arnesen |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:11:09 +0000 |
178 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:27:20 -0800 |
129 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:21:08 -0800 |
248 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:32:05 -0600 |
71 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:42:51 -0800 |
235 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:39:31 -0800 |
38 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:22:27 -0500 |
193 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:00:14 -0800 |
184 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:38:20 -0800 |
151 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:43:11 -0800 |
101 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:03:48 -0800 |
271 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:06:45 EST |
518 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:47:42 -0800 |
122 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:46:52 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:53:47 -0500 |
238 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:42:02 -0800 |
215 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:18:13 -0500 |
171 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:04:46 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:53:09 -0800 |
156 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Sara Trevisan |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:30:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:14:47 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:44:02 -0500 |
150 lines |
Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:18:22 -0800 |
115 lines |
Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:32:41 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Eliot essay
|
<> |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:28:49 -0500 |
12 lines |
Re: Eliot essay
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:05:52 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Eliot essay
|
<> |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:58:01 -0500 |
16 lines |
Eliot memorials (was Eliot as Touchstone)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:01:26 -0500 |
63 lines |
Eliot's 40th
|
Joshua Goldstein |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:16:35 -0800 |
33 lines |
From latest TLS
|
John Stewart |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:45:37 -0000 |
13 lines |
FW: Computer, microphone, iPod make broadcasting personal
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:40:28 -0800 |
41 lines |
FW: OT This ought to make for some interesting debate
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:41:13 -0800 |
45 lines |
How History is Recorded Now
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:13:36 EST |
37 lines |
Indic Contribution, Eliot and Thoreou... A paper by Cleo McNelly Kearns
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:00:07 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:20:14 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Sara Trevisan |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:03:09 +0100 |
130 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Kate Troy |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:53:12 EST |
56 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:08:28 -0800 |
142 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:15:22 +0100 |
103 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
<> |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:20:53 -0500 |
118 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
ERNESTO LIVORNI |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:38:22 +0100 |
135 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Sara Trevisan |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:00:57 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: International Symposium on TSE?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:02:09 -0800 |
108 lines |
International Symposium on TSE?
|
Temur Kobakhidze |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:12:16 +0000 |
78 lines |
Interview with Jean Verdenal's nephew
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:18:03 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Marie Larisch
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:06:59 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Marie Larisch
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:08:36 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:40:23 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:06:17 -0800 |
77 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Jacek Niecko |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:05:12 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 21:40:48 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:37:12 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Marie of TWL again
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:16:54 -0500 |
32 lines |
Marie of TWL again
|
Temur Kobakhidze |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:15:10 +0000 |
22 lines |
More stupid Eliot trivia
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:14:25 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: O.T.: MOVIE RECOMMENDATION
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:59:57 EST |
58 lines |
O.T.: MOVIE RECOMMENDATION
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:25:33 +0100 |
29 lines |
OT - Re: TSE Essays on CollegeHumor.com
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:18:00 -0500 |
26 lines |
OT: Neologism winners
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:06:08 -0500 |
103 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Kate Troy |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:29:11 EST |
179 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Justin L. Blessinger |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:25:49 -0600 |
139 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:11:10 EST |
88 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:57:03 -0800 |
300 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Justin L. Blessinger |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:19:48 -0600 |
701 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
George Carless |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:24:36 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:29:16 -0800 |
124 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:27:49 -0800 |
230 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Justin L. Blessinger |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:51:20 -0600 |
386 lines |
Re: OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:43:48 -0800 |
107 lines |
OT: our recent literacy discussion
|
Justin L. Blessinger |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:04:41 -0600 |
158 lines |
OT: Riddling the Inevitable, etc.
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:05:38 -0500 |
34 lines |
Pat Sloane's papers
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:14:41 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Reply on "The Merchant of Venice"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:31:56 -0800 |
218 lines |
Reply on "The Merchant of Venice"
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:01:08 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: Second Volume of Eliot Letters
|
Loucks, James |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:57:02 -0500 |
113 lines |
Re: Second Volume of Eliot Letters
|
Cassandra Laity |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:46:53 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Second Volume of Eliot Letters
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:52:41 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Second Volume of Eliot Letters
|
Cassandra Laity |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:55:31 -0500 |
44 lines |
Second Volume of Eliot Letters
|
Tom Gray |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:12 -0800 |
22 lines |
The end of TIME
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:52:31 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: The Sharpest Sight
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:26:10 +0100 |
75 lines |
The Sharpest Sight
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:15:37 -0500 |
89 lines |
Re: TSE Digest - 11 Jan 2005 to 12 Jan 2005 (#2005-8)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:43:03 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: TSE Digest - 11 Jan 2005 to 12 Jan 2005 (#2005-8)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:08:14 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: TSE Digest - 11 Jan 2005 to 12 Jan 2005 (#2005-8)
|
Temur Kobakhidze |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:45:01 +0000 |
94 lines |
Re: TSE Digest - 6 Jan 2005 to 9 Jan 2005 (#2005-5)
|
Temur Kobakhidze |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:35:00 +0000 |
161 lines |
Re: TSE Essays on CollegeHumor.com
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:51:54 +0100 |
107 lines |
TSE Essays on CollegeHumor.com
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:46:30 +0100 |
21 lines |
[Fwd: new PMLA citation rules ....]
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:46:11 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: [Fwd: [Marxism] British workers and the classics]
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:47:52 -0800 |
200 lines |
[Fwd: [Marxism] British workers and the classics]
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:31:45 -0600 |
180 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:21:43 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:50:37 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:31:36 -0800 |
254 lines |
{SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:20:38 -0500 |
278 lines |
{SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:42:52 -0500 |
247 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : A review of Merchant of Venice...
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:20:28 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:18:02 -0800 |
245 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:06:12 -0500 |
271 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:19:59 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone : "from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:11:46 -0500 |
281 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone :"from a point of view of ideas"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:50:09 -0800 |
88 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone :"from a point of view of ideas"
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:24:40 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: Eliot as Touchstone :"from a point of view of ideas"
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:38:34 -0500 |
102 lines |