|
|
|
Size
|
"It" is glad to be of service.
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:00:00 -0800 |
80 lines |
Re: "Unified Sensibility'"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:33:29 -0700 |
206 lines |
Re: "Unified Sensibility'"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:30:53 -0700 |
163 lines |
Re: "Unified Sensibility'"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:17:17 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: "Unified Sensibility'"
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 12:56:29 -0400 |
70 lines |
"Unified Sensibility'"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:03:02 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: A "Real" French Joke
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:31:45 EDT |
33 lines |
Re: Alas, poor Leonardo...
|
<> |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:11:31 EST |
45 lines |
Re: Alas, poor Leonardo...
|
J. Blessinger |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:35:50 -0600 |
213 lines |
Re: Alas, poor Leonardo...
|
Ken Armstrong |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:58:51 -0500 |
35 lines |
Alas, poor Leonardo...
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:01:16 +0200 |
164 lines |
Another quick source Re: sex trade info
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:59:34 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 12:10:16 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:26:46 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Mayne Russell |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:21:09 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:51:02 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:51:34 EDT |
40 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:00:56 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:57:09 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Anti
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:30 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: Anti
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:07:22 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:54:51 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Mayne Russell |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:51:35 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:39:21 EDT |
58 lines |
Re: Anti
|
<> |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 20:56:03 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:07:19 EST |
43 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Mayne Russell |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:26:29 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:48:06 EST |
113 lines |
Re: Anti
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:47:34 EST |
47 lines |
Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:40:51 EST |
51 lines |
Re: Anti--OT
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:22:21 EST |
53 lines |
Re: Anti--OT
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:15:19 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
Mayne Russell |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 07:39:39 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:08:37 EDT |
106 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
<> |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:35:09 EDT |
61 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:51:43 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:59:34 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:48:41 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:43:05 EDT |
84 lines |
Re: Anti-sharon
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:37:20 EDT |
106 lines |
Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:29:52 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:19:10 EDT |
84 lines |
Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:43:49 -0400 |
30 lines |
Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:26:55 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: cats
|
Peter Dillane |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:44:37 +1000 |
101 lines |
Re: cats
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:41:55 -0800 |
115 lines |
cats
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:05:55 EST |
44 lines |
CFP: Special Issue of Modernism/Modernity on T.S. Eliot
|
Cassandra Laity |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:50:00 -0400 |
43 lines |
Chirac's Infinite Wisdom
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:52:07 EST |
34 lines |
Re: CORRECTION Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:16:17 -0400 |
59 lines |
CORRECTION Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:20:26 -0500 |
31 lines |
David S. Harre/CPD/HHQ/HUD is out of the office.
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 01:03:49 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Eliot /Liberal
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:43:49 -0400 |
63 lines |
Eliot /Liberal
|
dorothy peters |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:35:59 -0700 |
38 lines |
Eliot, Gioia
|
Pietros Maneos |
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:01:03 EDT |
493 lines |
Re: European "smoke"
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:11:35 EST |
48 lines |
European Chocolate
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 22:02:33 EST |
51 lines |
Re: Florida State Song /Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:16:12 EDT |
121 lines |
Florida State Song /Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Francis Gavin |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:30:05 -0800 |
166 lines |
Re: Florida State Song OT
|
<> |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:32:48 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: FW: A.Word.A.Day--clerihew
|
<> |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:37:24 EDT |
37 lines |
Re: FW: A.Word.A.Day--clerihew
|
George Carless |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:57:02 -0400 |
13 lines |
Re: FW: A.Word.A.Day--clerihew
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:27:44 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: FW: A.Word.A.Day--clerihew
|
<> |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:53:50 -0400 |
13 lines |
FW: A.Word.A.Day--clerihew
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 23:11:17 -0700 |
73 lines |
FW: Cultures of Violence Conference - POPCULT
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:28:45 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: FW: intersting stuff!
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:56:28 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: FW: intersting stuff!
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:25:41 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: FW: intersting stuff!
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:49:52 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: FW: intersting stuff!
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:38:34 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: FW: intersting stuff!
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:16:16 -0400 |
71 lines |
FW: intersting stuff!
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:04:44 -0700 |
380 lines |
Re: FW: iraq jokes
|
Jacek Niecko |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:13:47 -0400 |
491 lines |
Re: FW: iraq jokes
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:06:06 EDT |
305 lines |
FW: iraq jokes
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:41:24 -0700 |
116 lines |
Re: FW: OT: intersting stuff!
|
William Orlofsky |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:56:21 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: FW: OT: intersting stuff!
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:33:16 -0400 |
80 lines |
FW: some really terrifying information
|
<> |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:47:07 EDT |
24 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:19:27 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:10:05 EDT |
56 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:52:22 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:03:12 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:50:54 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: Government (OT)
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:24:45 -0500 |
64 lines |
Government (OT)
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:42:46 EST |
55 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:42:01 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:26:14 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:59:02 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 09:01:18 EDT |
25 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:44:04 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
George Carless |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:25:48 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
<> |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:16:45 EST |
29 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:29:55 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Mayne Russell |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 18:22:19 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:02:46 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Grammar
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:22:15 -0600 |
13 lines |
Grammar
|
Cornelius Kingston |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:47:42 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:13:47 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:50:58 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:59:07 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:04:58 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:43:24 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:42:39 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:44:01 -0400 |
169 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 20:38:59 -0700 |
161 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:28:38 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:44:27 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:03:16 -0400 |
208 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:32:37 -0700 |
189 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:34:19 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:30:17 -0400 |
164 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:57:47 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:56:10 -0700 |
139 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:50:11 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:46:15 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:43:05 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:23:28 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:16:21 -0700 |
91 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:04:19 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:01:43 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:27:36 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:54:16 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
George Carless |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:34:48 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:21:22 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:11:36 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:06:43 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 12:47:45 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:16:27 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:53:04 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:49:04 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:33:43 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:31:30 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Jacek Niecko |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 19:43:52 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 19:15:03 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:42:54 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I, the loyal apposition)
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:16:51 -0400 |
157 lines |
Re: Grammar (you and I, the loyal apposition)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:08:38 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Grammar--OT commentary in favor of
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:17:51 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: Grammar: Authoritative Sources
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:37:56 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Grammar: Authoritative Sources
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:53:02 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Grammar: Authoritative Sources
|
Robert Summers |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:48:30 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Hare and/or annotation (was: Pachel ...)
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:32:34 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Hare and/or annotation (was: Pachel ...)
|
George Carless |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:27:30 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Hare and/or annotation (was: Pachel ...)
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:22:47 -0500 |
24 lines |
Hare and/or annotation (was: Pachel ...)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:55:52 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: History's cunning passages
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:35:00 -0400 |
51 lines |
History's cunning passages
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:06:59 -0700 |
35 lines |
How to unsubscribe
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:33:16 -0400 |
13 lines |
How we Got There Re: sex trade info
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:30:54 -0500 |
50 lines |
Meaning vs Significance, was Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 00:30:41 -0600 |
79 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:44:07 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:32:27 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:46:43 -0700 |
99 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:43:58 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:21:56 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:04:39 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:12:30 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:14:12 -0700 |
141 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:27:35 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
<> |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:12:24 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:38:56 -0600 |
104 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:33:34 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:17:23 +0200 |
100 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:04:13 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:52:12 -0800 |
95 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Jacek Niecko |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:29:21 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:41:07 -0500 |
56 lines |
Medieval Thinking
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:59:50 EST |
78 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking (again, clarifying)
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:34:20 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Medieval Thinking (again, clarifying)
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:07:08 EDT |
93 lines |
Re: Michaelangelo
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:35:45 -0700 |
201 lines |
Re: Michaelangelo
|
J. Blessinger |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 12:09:13 -0600 |
275 lines |
Re: Michaelangelo (was not Leonardo...)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:17:02 +0200 |
238 lines |
Re: Montgomey gwammar
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 03:44:02 -0700 |
47 lines |
Montgomey gwammar
|
Francis Gavin |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:49:52 -0800 |
32 lines |
MSA 5 Panel CFP Extended: 4/11
|
Cassandra Laity |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:30:37 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: O.T. U.S. & Israel, was Re: Grammar
|
Kate Troy |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 15:17:25 EST |
92 lines |
O.T. U.S. & Israel, was Re: Grammar
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 12:41:36 -0600 |
44 lines |
Re: On epigraphs: reply to Nancy
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 23:36:20 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: On epigraphs: reply to Nancy
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:59:02 -0600 |
32 lines |
On epigraphs: reply to Nancy
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 19:21:05 -0800 |
36 lines |
OT - Book on Ezra Pound online
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:11:26 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: OT--MARGARET ATWOOD: A Canadian Writes to America
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:42:57 -0700 |
195 lines |
OT--MARGARET ATWOOD: A Canadian Writes to America
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:30:21 -0400 |
173 lines |
OT: American guerilla warfare (was: Grammar)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:44:13 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:42:56 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:58:11 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:47:59 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:35:32 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:28:43 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
George Carless |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:27:53 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
George Carless |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:23:57 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:18:13 EDT |
64 lines |
Re: OT: Anti
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:02:43 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: OT: Anti (I hope this clarifies -- anti-semites)
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:18:13 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: OT: Anti (I hope this clarifies)
|
Kate Troy |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:25:19 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: OT: Anti (I hope this clarifies)
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:14:38 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: OT: Anti (I hope this clarifies)
|
<> |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:59:24 EDT |
75 lines |
Re: OT: Disloyal scallops (was, Sawdust restaurants)
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:12:40 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: OT: Grammar--OT commentary in favor of
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:49:02 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: OT: Grammar--OT commentary in favor of
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:23:01 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: OT: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:00:18 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Pachel rings a bell again and again a
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:18:36 -0400 |
47 lines |
OT: Re: Pachel rings a bell again and again a
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:13:13 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Rappin' Possum
|
Kate Troy |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:09:41 EST |
58 lines |
OT: Re: Rappin' Possum
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:37:26 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: OT: The Poetry of D.H. Rumsfeld
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:15:45 EST |
26 lines |
OT: The Poetry of D.H. Rumsfeld
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:08:40 -0500 |
167 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:22:13 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:43:54 EDT |
40 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Jon W McKenney |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:21:19 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:21:18 EDT |
73 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:24:11 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:11:03 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
George Carless |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:47:50 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:09:26 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:35:48 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:28:18 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:27:12 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:56:53 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:27:42 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:26:25 EDT |
20 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
George Carless |
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:24:30 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 03:28:24 EDT |
38 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:37:15 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:28:53 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:14:58 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:34:57 -0400 |
203 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:44:37 -0700 |
163 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 00:54:31 EDT |
61 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
George Carless |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:42:53 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:15:20 -0500 |
134 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:04:24 EDT |
93 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:53:47 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:09 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:38:43 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:43:05 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:31:09 EDT |
61 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:32:18 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Jen Barnett |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:04:37 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
George Carless |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:23:31 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:59:08 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:49:22 -0400 |
77 lines |
Overwhelming question about Prufrock
|
<> |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:58:38 EDT |
48 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a backwards bell, but then who doesn't?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:11:39 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a backwards bell, but then who doesn't?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:35:57 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:37 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:16:16 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
George Carless |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:46:14 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Cornelius Kingston |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:39:14 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:11:16 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:51:29 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:29:36 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 23:40:06 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:24:52 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:03:03 -0400 |
282 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:39:38 -0500 |
270 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:24:54 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:14:39 -0700 |
174 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:10:48 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:55:55 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
<> |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:40:40 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:48:53 -0400 |
105 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:42:24 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:45:51 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:43:48 -0400 |
152 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
<> |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:40:09 EDT |
28 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:13:51 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:03:07 -0700 |
138 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:55:42 -0400 |
109 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:54:39 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:54:00 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:51:22 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:48:56 -0700 |
97 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:44:42 -0700 |
78 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:35:36 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:33:34 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Pietros Maneos |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:27:45 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:16:59 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Pietros Maneos |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:16:30 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:04:35 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:15:39 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:14:53 -0500 |
23 lines |
Pachel rings a bell backwards
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:59:02 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:09:01 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:15:13 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:31:48 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:14:47 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 05:21:06 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:43:29 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:40:45 EST |
68 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:58:45 EST |
37 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:27:20 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:20:34 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 18:12:03 -0800 |
47 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:56:53 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:35:42 -0800 |
151 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:34:35 EST |
48 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:33:25 EST |
48 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
J. Blessinger |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:21:39 -0600 |
290 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 04:02:25 EST |
145 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:42:27 -0600 |
16 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:00:19 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:50:17 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:33:48 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:07:18 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:48:54 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:43:32 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:40:40 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:07:55 EST |
48 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:51:04 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:40:14 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:18:18 EST |
32 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:06:15 EST |
56 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 23:23:04 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Kate Troy |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:42:44 EST |
43 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Kate Troy |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:29:31 EST |
49 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:23:48 -0500 |
103 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:15:59 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:07:58 EST |
47 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:00:30 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:54:27 EST |
48 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:41:30 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:08:38 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:37:59 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:40:31 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:40:15 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:21:25 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:17:59 EST |
53 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:14:09 EST |
46 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:12:52 EST |
49 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:11:08 EST |
71 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:05:24 EST |
73 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:01:07 EST |
47 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:59:57 EST |
47 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:33:19 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:18:11 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
dorothy peters |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:47:30 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:36:40 -0600 |
19 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:35:29 -0600 |
30 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
dorothy peters |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:09:42 -0800 |
13 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:54:46 -0500 |
232 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:17:47 -0500 |
219 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:11:45 +0100 |
215 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Michelle Baker |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 06:05:10 -0800 |
126 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Vishvesh Obla |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 05:43:40 -0800 |
193 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:48:15 -0800 |
134 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:24:47 -0500 |
98 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:02:27 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:49:58 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:40:37 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:33:20 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:10:35 -0600 |
63 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:43:09 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
dorothy peters |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:46:53 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:59:51 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:53:34 EST |
51 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:50:39 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:47:39 EST |
40 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:48:09 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
<> |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:43:30 EST |
44 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:45:11 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:25:10 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
George Carless |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:17:33 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: Prufrock's "smoke"
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:17:52 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Rappin' Possum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:52:54 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Rappin' Possum
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:21:03 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Rappin' Possum
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:50:59 -0500 |
30 lines |
Reply to Peter: Guido's punishment
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:02:54 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Guido and confession
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:25:55 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Guido and confession
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:00:45 EST |
45 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Guido and confession
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:35:45 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Guido and confession
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:09:33 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Sin and secrets
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:17:34 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Sin and secrets
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:14:36 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Reply to Rick: Sin and secrets
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:28:27 -0500 |
45 lines |
Reply to Rick: Sin and secrets
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:58:15 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: Sawdust restaurants
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:05:45 EDT |
27 lines |
Re: Sawdust restaurants
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 21:48:52 EDT |
81 lines |
Re: Sawdust restaurants
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:34:52 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Sawdust restaurants
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:46:56 EDT |
46 lines |
Sawdust restaurants
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:15:41 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:31:14 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:07:25 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:16:50 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:20:49 EDT |
44 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:15:59 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish - Women's Studies |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:55:18 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Kate Troy |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:15:53 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:55:00 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:40:16 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:30:23 -0400 |
32 lines |
Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:50:50 -0500 |
48 lines |
Seminar Listings for MSA 5
|
Cassandra Laity |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:59:18 -0400 |
160 lines |
Re: sex trade info
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:18:05 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: sex trade info
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:06:53 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: sex trade info
|
George Carless |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:45:07 +0100 |
12 lines |
sex trade info
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:44:14 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Sloppy as usual, wrong as usual/ Florida State Song /Re: Anyone know from whence this cometh?
|
Francis Gavin |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:06:33 -0800 |
180 lines |
Re: Sloppy as usual, wrong as usual/ Florida State Song /Re: Anyone know from...
|
Kate Troy |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:14:27 EDT |
40 lines |
Smoke + Poirier review
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:32:29 +0200 |
60 lines |
Sorry if this has been posted before..
|
George Carless |
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:31:22 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:41:07 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:31:38 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:58:25 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:38:46 EST |
45 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
<> |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:36:52 EST |
55 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Jacek Niecko |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:13:27 -0500 |
522 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:56:04 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:02:41 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:56:46 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:52:52 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:49:14 -0600 |
30 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:06:04 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:57:09 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:47:31 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:35:05 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:01:12 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:18:37 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:54:55 -0500 |
139 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:36:02 -0500 |
153 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
George Carless |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:52:45 +0100 |
89 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:52:40 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: a long post
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:03:09 -0800 |
22 lines |
Up in smoke: a long post
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:21:00 -0800 |
104 lines |
Re: Up in smoke: Baseball
|
Kate Troy |
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:58:08 EST |
30 lines |
Yes! Let's have more notes.
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:22:35 -0400 |
65 lines |
[Fwd: Seeing and Listening, was Re: Grammar (you and I)]
|
D.Gregory Griffith |
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:42:11 -0400 |
44 lines |