|
|
Size
|
Re: Brooke
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 10:15:02 +0100 |
385 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:26:02 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:51:25 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:32:16 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:28:01 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:02:45 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Brooke
|
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:00:01 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:10:47 -0800 |
145 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:04:52 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:51:46 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:37:05 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:36:40 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:13:59 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:03:27 -0800 |
140 lines |
CFP: MSA V Conference, "Modernist Cultures"
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:34:30 -0500 |
174 lines |
Create an on-line library the easy way
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:26:36 -0500 |
53 lines |
David S. Harre/CPD/HHQ/HUD is out of the office.
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:52:49 -0500 |
12 lines |
Re: deBeauvoir's man
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:29:37 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Duchamp (was Love at first? sight)
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:15:30 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:35:29 EST |
36 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:29:41 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:52:40 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 19:03:27 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 18:03:34 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:18:33 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:59:43 -0600 |
50 lines |
Eliot and Duchamp Lovers: Who Knew?
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:14:12 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Eliot at Princeton (1948)
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:45:36 -0600 |
38 lines |
Eliot at Princeton (1948)
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:59:55 -0500 |
131 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:09:29 -0800 |
40 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:15:09 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:33:03 EST |
38 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:25:19 EST |
38 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:15:02 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: Emily's Dickinsons
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:39:51 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: faber and faber
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:12:00 -0500 |
29 lines |
faber and faber
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:13:30 -0800 |
15 lines |
Re: French torture
|
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:40:39 +0100 |
24 lines |
Good wishes
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:33:21 -0800 |
20 lines |
Re: Griping about griping
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 14:51:52 -0600 |
24 lines |
Re: Handelsblatt newspaper -- Wall St. Poet story
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:36:24 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: Handelsblatt newspaper -- Wall St. Poet story
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:24:18 -0600 |
40 lines |
Re: Handelsblatt newspaper -- Wall St. Poet story
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:10:58 -0600 |
25 lines |
Holy Katz there, Bradman
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:24:48 -0800 |
26 lines |
Hurry up please, it's time.
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:06:51 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: In the still of the night
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 03:17:26 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: In the still of the night
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:42:20 +0100 |
25 lines |
In the still of the night
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:19:36 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Jauch's itch or its vs it's
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:55:24 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Jauch's itch or its vs it's
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:50:10 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Jauch's itch or its vs it's
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:34:13 -0600 |
25 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:22:48 -0800 |
78 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:16:12 -0800 |
86 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:39:53 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 19:39:10 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:15:00 -0600 |
30 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:05:57 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:42:26 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 23:11:01 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 23:07:09 -0500 |
196 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:03:22 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 19:41:46 -0800 |
163 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 03:29:04 +0100 |
168 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:46:46 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:45:20 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:05:36 -0600 |
19 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:03:26 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:47:32 -0800 |
183 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:36:39 -0800 |
172 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:05:35 -0800 |
20 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:50:32 -0800 |
2732 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:24:54 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:52:21 -0800 |
20 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 12:45:20 -0500 |
302 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 09:15:05 -0800 |
119 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 00:13:24 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 21:24:50 EST |
20 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:59:44 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:21:30 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:56:08 -0600 |
14 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:52:56 -0600 |
57 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:32:02 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:30:56 -0500 |
158 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:30:50 -0800 |
163 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:28:41 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:05:09 EST |
57 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 20:24:43 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:45:50 -0800 |
90 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 20:35:25 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:33:03 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:57:35 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:15:51 -0500 |
41 lines |
Love at first? sight
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:57:47 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:17:09 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:00:04 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:52:24 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:35:34 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:34:13 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 21:27:39 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:50:03 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:57:29 -0600 |
34 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:32:37 EST |
62 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:21:51 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:50:17 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:42:05 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:26:52 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:51:28 -0500 |
56 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:33:29 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:13:58 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:10:14 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:06:02 EST |
41 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:00:23 -0600 |
30 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:57:18 EST |
31 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:51:43 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:49:44 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:27:50 EST |
34 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:08:16 -0600 |
57 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:42:00 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:14:05 EST |
22 lines |
Marianne Moore poem in WWII
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:07:40 -0500 |
66 lines |
Marie and the Vienna Public Works department
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:49:52 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: meaning and significance (was OT: Great war and 'honour')
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:46:59 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: meaning and significance (was OT: Great war and 'honour')
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:06:27 -0500 |
24 lines |
New words creation time
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 16:20:01 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:43:17 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:41:45 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:16:54 -0800 |
80 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:57:45 -0800 |
9 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:48:44 -0500 |
177 lines |
Re: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:27:05 -0800 |
74 lines |
Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:47:04 -0500 |
65 lines |
NYTimes.com Article: From the Front, a Corner of Hell That Is Forever Lyrical
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:20:03 -0500 |
207 lines |
Re: NYTimes.com Article: From the Front,a Corner of Hell That Is Forever Lyrical
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:07:51 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: NYTimes.com Article: From the Front,a Corner of Hell That Is Forever Lyrical
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:16:32 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: NYTimes.com Article: From the Front,a Corner of Hell That IsForever Lyrical
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:15:43 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: NYTimes.com Article: From the Front,a Corner of Hell ThatIsForever Lyrical
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:45:52 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: Off topic - low urinals (was: Eliot and Duchamp)
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:24:36 -0600 |
54 lines |
Re: Off topic - low urinals (was: Eliot and Duchamp)
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 18:53:10 EST |
45 lines |
Off topic - low urinals (was: Eliot and Duchamp)
|
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:30:55 -0500 |
37 lines |
off topic -- "Achilles in Vietnam"
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 03:08:01 EST |
180 lines |
Re: Off-List - Women
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:39:38 -0500 |
74 lines |
Re: Off-List - Women
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:00:57 EST |
119 lines |
Re: Off-List - Women--sorry this was sent on
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 23:47:41 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: OT - Play dates
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:48:06 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: OT - Play dates
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 22:06:06 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: OT - Play dates
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:09:25 EST |
40 lines |
Re: OT - Play dates
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 20:57:47 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: OT - Play dates
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 19:13:55 -0600 |
24 lines |
OT - Play dates
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 16:37:09 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:47:19 EST |
45 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 08:49:00 -0600 |
71 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:09:08 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:00:34 -0600 |
28 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:39:14 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 00:54:21 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:25:26 -0600 |
18 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:39:00 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:49:32 EST |
38 lines |
OT insanity
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:08:26 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: OT: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:47:41 EST |
45 lines |
OT: Bush y Rice
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:42:45 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:01:29 -0800 |
41 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:55:16 -0500 |
174 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:10:46 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:10:19 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:40:45 -0600 |
22 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:39:46 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:27:29 -0600 |
27 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:09:25 EST |
39 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:40:12 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:39:12 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:01:22 -0800 |
143 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:28:37 -0500 |
104 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:48:16 -0800 |
81 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:38:01 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:47:35 -0600 |
46 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:03:17 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:54:36 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:53:42 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:43:46 EST |
103 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:22:24 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:17:26 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:22:51 EST |
42 lines |
OT: Great war and 'honour'
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:41:29 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: OT: its vs it's
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:52:54 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: OT: its vs it's
|
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 15:11:23 EST |
38 lines |
Re: OT: its vs it's
|
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:21:33 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: OT: its vs it's
|
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:16:56 EST |
21 lines |
Re: OT: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:22:40 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: OT: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:55:06 -0000 |
45 lines |
Re: OT: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:18:45 -0600 |
36 lines |
OT: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:19:49 -0800 |
65 lines |
OT: Nonexistent scholarship by nobody (poss dup)
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:40:48 -0800 |
76 lines |
OT: One buwwet weft!!
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:52:05 -0800 |
71 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:49:34 -0800 |
2758 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:57:42 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:46:44 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:41:17 -0800 |
31 lines |
OT: Re: Love at first? sight
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 12:42:09 -0500 |
19 lines |
OT: RE: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:29:01 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: OT: spelling
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:34:54 -0600 |
23 lines |
Re: OT: spelling
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:31:17 -0600 |
30 lines |
Re: OT: Thatcher (was Marianne Moore...)
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:36:11 -0500 |
74 lines |
OT: Thatcher (was Marianne Moore...)
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:22:57 +0100 |
44 lines |
Other Poets of WW 1 [Fwd: Anthem for Doomed Youth]
|
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:29:31 -0600 |
170 lines |
Re: Profundities - or fathoming the depths?
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:21:09 -0800 |
88 lines |
Re: Profundities - or fathoming the depths?
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:47:41 -0800 |
71 lines |
Profundities - or fathoming the depths?
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:47:14 +0100 |
140 lines |
Rats - dictionary of historical slang. Do any of these apply to E liot poems?
|
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:57:58 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: Rats - dictionary of historical slang. Do any of these apply to E liotpoems?
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:31:43 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Rats - dictionary of historical slang. Do any of these apply to E liotpoems?
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:40:58 -0500 |
47 lines |
Readymades
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:20:11 -0600 |
16 lines |
Re: Rupert
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:39:30 -0500 |
37 lines |
Rupert
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:07:18 EST |
52 lines |
Re: Satre's Woman
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:41:56 EST |
49 lines |
Re: Satre's Woman
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:14:42 -0600 |
77 lines |
Re: Satre's Woman
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 14:20:55 -0500 |
38 lines |
Satre's Woman
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:37:31 EST |
42 lines |
Re: She's No Lillian Hellman
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:47:45 -0500 |
31 lines |
She's No Lillian Hellman
|
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:32:11 EST |
52 lines |
Re: stumped: quote!
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 07:03:03 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: stumped: quote!
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:21:35 -0800 |
36 lines |
stumped: quote!
|
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:27:46 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: sudden dearth?
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:23:48 -0500 |
58 lines |
sudden dearth?
|
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:16:43 EST |
30 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:32:52 -0800 |
61 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:28:26 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:47:34 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:43:25 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:08:33 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:45:30 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:08:19 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Tambo and Bones
|
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:58:11 -0500 |
100 lines |
Tambo and Bones
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:45:20 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: Thatcher (was Marianne Moore...)
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:39:09 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: Thatcher, feminism, etc.
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:02:29 -0800 |
126 lines |
Re: Thatcher, feminism, etc.
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:48:01 -0500 |
109 lines |
Re: Thatcher, feminism, etc.
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:30:22 -0800 |
90 lines |
Thatcher, feminism, etc.
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:25:42 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: The Education of the TSE List
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:52:05 -0800 |
2764 lines |
The Education of the TSE List
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 21:22:40 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:27:25 EST |
88 lines |
Re: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:38:27 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:28:50 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:36:53 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:17:22 +0100 |
62 lines |
Those are diamonds that were his eyes
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:59:03 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:41:37 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:18:43 -0800 |
32 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:20:47 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:46:54 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:57:56 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:15:43 -0800 |
91 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 07:39:20 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:23:34 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:08:36 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:49:17 -0800 |
100 lines |
Re: Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:26:47 -0500 |
82 lines |
Those are whirls thatwere his pies.
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:57:48 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: TWL and JJ's Ulysses
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:18:27 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: TWL and JJ's Ulysses
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:27:21 +0100 |
53 lines |
TWL and JJ's Ulysses
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 04:48:08 EST |
86 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 04:29:57 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:34:22 -0000 |
163 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:13:00 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 06:50:56 -0000 |
127 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 01:54:06 EST |
128 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:33:09 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: TWL epigraph
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:01:24 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: Two points re recent posts, reply to Peter and Carol
|
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 10:27:10 -0600 |
32 lines |
Re: Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:58:32 -0800 |
19 lines |
Re: Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:47:42 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:19:20 -0800 |
22 lines |
Re: Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:40:59 -0800 |
105 lines |
Re: Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:36:22 -0500 |
152 lines |
Two Profound Eliot Influences
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:21:15 -0800 |
39 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:13:25 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:12:11 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:01:33 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:51:38 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:05:32 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:52:38 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:57:57 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:06:49 EST |
31 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:30:09 -0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:09:43 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:59:26 -0600 |
21 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 21:36:00 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Two questions
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:10:59 -0600 |
18 lines |
Two questions
|
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:15:16 -0800 |
16 lines |
Re: Vico
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:57:13 -0800 |
86 lines |
Vico
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:02:35 -0500 |
58 lines |
Vico
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:42:07 -0800 |
26 lines |
What wold Eliot have thought of this?
|
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:28:38 -0800 |
9 lines |
Re: Women in TSE
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:21:31 +1100 |
208 lines |
Re: Women in TSE
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:58:52 -0000 |
161 lines |
Re: Women in TSE
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:26:59 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Women in TSE
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:59:20 -0500 |
54 lines |
Women in TSE
|
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:30:22 +1100 |
112 lines |