|
|
|
|
Size
|
Re: 'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:14:13 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: 'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1
|
erwin welsch |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:02:47 -0700 |
151 lines |
'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:52:43 -0500 |
130 lines |
Re: 'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1: Correction
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:20:55 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: 'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1: Correction
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 08:35:38 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: 'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1: Correction
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:19:52 -0400 |
19 lines |
'Ultimate Burbank' . . .Draft 1: Correction
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:24:09 -0500 |
27 lines |
A toe in the water on Burbank
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:59:29 -0700 |
21 lines |
Apology to Nancy
|
Sara Trevisan |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:53:51 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:42:39 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:54:45 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:56:31 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:18:57 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:26:20 -0400 |
88 lines |
Apostrophe history (I do not consider it off topic.)
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:25:24 -0400 |
26 lines |
At ebay, rare Eliot books
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 15:55:50 -0400 |
52 lines |
Auden's Eliot Limerick
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:01:39 -0400 |
24 lines |
Austens spelling (off topic)
|
Sara Trevisan |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:16:09 +0200 |
119 lines |
David S. Harre/CPD/HHQ/HUD is out of the office.
|
<> |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:01:56 -0400 |
12 lines |
David S. Harre/CPD/HHQ/HUD is out of the office.
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:01:07 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: drama and poetry
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:12:27 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: drama and poetry
|
Amanda Harris |
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 00:06:24 +0100 |
43 lines |
drama and poetry
|
erik verhaar |
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 00:32:38 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: Drinking by the clock
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:57:33 -0400 |
17 lines |
Eeldrop and Appleplex is on-line (for now)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:10:09 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: eliot site
|
<> |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:07:14 EDT |
22 lines |
eliot site
|
<> |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 09:54:46 EDT |
23 lines |
Eliot's lecture: an attack?
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:44:55 +0100 |
40 lines |
Email Problem
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:51:26 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Exchange rates (1920 also) (was:New Eliot poem)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:00:51 -0400 |
72 lines |
Exchange rates (1920 also) (was:New Eliot poem)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:29:16 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (links to TSE)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:53:30 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:42:03 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:12:13 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:05:19 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 19:42:52 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:31:05 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:57:27 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:04:24 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Sara Trevisan |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:27:02 +0200 |
117 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:22:38 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: Finnegans spelling (off topic)
|
Sara Trevisan |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:35:50 +0200 |
156 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:50:22 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:23:09 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:53:47 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:57:14 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:49:07 EDT |
50 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:35:41 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 22:43:16 +0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:37:23 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:28:26 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 22:32:23 +0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:31:28 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:31:17 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:58:25 EDT |
39 lines |
Flags and flagrant failures of comprehension
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:39:09 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Flags and other Tropical Garden Decorations
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:22:13 EDT |
39 lines |
FW: POPCULT - Cultural Studies
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:48:08 -0700 |
45 lines |
FW: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 19:31:49 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Gerontion
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:34:39 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Gerontion
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:01:32 -0700 |
68 lines |
Gerontion and Anti-Semitism
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:48:56 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:49:39 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:33:47 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:30:42 -0400 |
290 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 07:13:27 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion
|
erwin welsch |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:55:22 -0700 |
261 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion (Eliot and Millin)
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:50:08 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Gerontion discussion (Eliot and Millin)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:24:19 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:55:36 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
<> |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:35:28 EDT |
75 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:26:48 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:02:18 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 17:23:30 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:57:16 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:54:34 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
<> |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:39:22 EDT |
49 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:14:32 +0800 |
34 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:06:59 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 22:53:59 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:39:55 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:06:05 -0700 |
119 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is)
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:22:31 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:36:39 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:50:11 EDT |
54 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:27:56 EDT |
80 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:27:06 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:20:38 EDT |
36 lines |
Gerontion, was (and still partly is) Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:57:11 -0500 |
71 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:21:33 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
erwin welsch |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:17:56 -0700 |
220 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:36:00 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:10:39 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:37:34 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:50:13 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 07:45:55 -0400 |
56 lines |
Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:34:00 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: hippo & pomegranate (was: the writer and his work)
|
<> |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:38:24 EDT |
49 lines |
Re: hippo & pomegranate (was: the writer and his work)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:47:33 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: hippo & pomegranate (was: the writer and his work)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:34:22 -0700 |
115 lines |
Re: hippo & pomegranate (was: the writer and his work)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:16:08 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: hippo & pomegranate (was: the writer and his work)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:57:37 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: hippo (was: the writer and his work"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:18:05 -0700 |
30 lines |
hippo (was: the writer and his work"
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:39:11 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: hippo (was: the writer and his work)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:28:50 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Interpretive aesthetic
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:14:04 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: Interpretive aesthetic
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:10:56 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Interpretive aesthetic
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:59:47 -0500 |
73 lines |
Re: Interpretive aesthetic
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:56:58 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: Interpretive aesthetic
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:03:03 -0500 |
25 lines |
Interpretive aesthetic
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:06:53 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Jennifer's last call in TWL
|
Sara Trevisan |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:41:16 +0200 |
184 lines |
last call and standarised spelling: "Dialect"
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:43:46 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL
|
Somerville, George |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:02:44 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:55:57 -0700 |
101 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 19:45:03 +0200 |
177 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL (has become OT)
|
Sam Catanzaro |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:52:15 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page : a replyt...
|
<> |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:36:46 EDT |
80 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page : a replyto Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:32:55 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page : a replyto Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:07:31 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page : a replyto Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:08:01 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page : a replyto Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:35:50 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page: a reply to Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:16:13 -0400 |
159 lines |
Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page: a reply to Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:58:01 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; Finnegans Wake; and punctuation on the page: a replyto Nancy and Sarah (Long Post)
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:28:08 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:13:23 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:54:13 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:57:33 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:16:58 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:52:29 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Last call in TWL; punctuation and caps
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:38:29 -0700 |
88 lines |
List quirk: attn G. Somerville
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:56:49 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 03:55:44 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:23:52 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Michelle Hadden |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:05:44 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:18:06 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:10:19 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:44:11 EDT |
33 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:11:04 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:55:01 EDT |
36 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:54:19 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:59:24 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:45:11 EDT |
37 lines |
Re: Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:22:16 -0400 |
98 lines |
Milton, Austen, Eliot was Re: the writer and the work
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:49:04 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:34:27 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 22:23:29 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Brian Vanderford |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 20:56:12 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Amanda Harris |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:37:41 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:35:44 EDT |
19 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:25:59 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:45:19 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:31:14 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:44:25 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:03:24 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:43:18 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:22:43 EDT |
34 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:21:32 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:09:24 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:07:50 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:49:42 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:23:28 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:20:12 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:06:40 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:43:36 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Muses/Moses
|
<> |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:08:53 EDT |
41 lines |
Muses/Moses
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:54:08 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: My grammatical skills: reply to Nancy
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:59:04 -0400 |
33 lines |
My grammatical skills: reply to Nancy
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:46:50 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: My quotation and its missing source
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:48:19 -0700 |
62 lines |
My quotation and its missing source
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:16:17 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: My quotation and its missing source OFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLIST
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:08:07 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: New Eliot poem
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:24:53 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: New Eliot poem
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:08:44 -0400 |
118 lines |
Re: New Eliot poem
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:33:14 -0700 |
58 lines |
New Eliot poem
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:50:40 -0400 |
16 lines |
Note: Read closely and understood: it is hardly complicated.
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:56:47 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Off topic - A URL for Apostrophe history
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:14:20 -0700 |
23 lines |
Off topic - A URL for Apostrophe history
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:38:03 -0400 |
11 lines |
Re: Off topic - Email problem
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:27:33 -0700 |
46 lines |
Off topic - Email problem
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:26:34 -0400 |
28 lines |
Off Topic - Speech synthesis poetry readings.
|
Rickard A Parker |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:44:16 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Off Topic - Speech synthesis poetry readings. (Illustrated TWL)
|
Brian Vanderford |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:04:42 -0400 |
21 lines |
Off topics
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:11:39 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: On Readers of Poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 17:42:46 -0700 |
57 lines |
On Readers of Poems
|
Sara Trevisan |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 14:10:54 +0200 |
125 lines |
On the voicing of TWL; Erratum to my last post
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:37:58 +0100 |
45 lines |
OT letter E
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:19:58 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: OT: COEXISTENCE
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:02:52 +0200 |
141 lines |
Re: OT: COEXISTENCE
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:03:32 -0400 |
42 lines |
OT: COEXISTENCE
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:49:59 +0200 |
629 lines |
OT: Looking for fotos
|
Ken Armstrong |
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:45:45 -0400 |
16 lines |
OT: Re: Guy Brown's reading of Burbank
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:59:14 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: OT: Re: Samuel Johnson
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:49:09 -0400 |
30 lines |
OT: Re: Samuel Johnson
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:04:45 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: OT: sacrifice
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:51:05 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: OT: sacrifice
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:37:31 -0400 |
66 lines |
OT: sacrifice
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:24:19 -0700 |
126 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:34:15 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:05:58 EDT |
51 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Venus Freeman |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:41:59 -0400 |
128 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Amanda Harris |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:56:46 +0100 |
178 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Brian Vanderford |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:36:27 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:33:47 EDT |
93 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:00:30 EDT |
59 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Amanda Harris |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:35:36 +0100 |
129 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:18:42 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:01:44 -0700 |
88 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:56:05 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:52:43 +0800 |
132 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:57:22 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:14:53 -0400 |
137 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Venus Freeman |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:43:18 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:52:59 -0500 |
307 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Tom Gray |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:14:49 -0700 |
246 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Robert Summers |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:41:22 -0400 |
258 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:28:47 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:07:30 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:01:39 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:32:59 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:30:45 EDT |
15 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:18:04 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:19:53 EDT |
63 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:57:42 -0700 |
98 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:08:20 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:37:20 -0400 |
223 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:12:01 +0200 |
198 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:55:22 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:27:42 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:45:41 -0700 |
82 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Robert Summers |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:59:31 -0400 |
126 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:28:37 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:02:50 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 06:07:49 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 13:58:45 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 02:41:30 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:23:37 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 21:55:55 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 21:33:07 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 20:26:52 EDT |
71 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Robert Summers |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:37:14 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 18:16:32 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:39:07 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 22:22:29 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:54:00 -0700 |
121 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:50:13 -0700 |
131 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:45:46 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:34:31 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:48:14 -0400 |
54 lines |
OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:38:42 +0200 |
94 lines |
Re: OT: Why people should read things more closely
|
<> |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:06:46 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: OT: Why people should read things more closely
|
<> |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:16:54 EDT |
26 lines |
Re: OT: Why people should read things more closely
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:13:41 -0400 |
45 lines |
OT: Why people should read things more closely
|
<> |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 23:42:59 EDT |
32 lines |
Re: Paying the rent
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 07:52:09 -0500 |
27 lines |
Paying the rent
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 11:39:15 +0100 |
30 lines |
Philip Larkin's librarianship
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:47:17 +0100 |
31 lines |
Query
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:16:49 -0500 |
12 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:44:28 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:36:16 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:31:52 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 02:17:11 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:11:56 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 22:28:57 EDT |
37 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:24:22 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Brian Vanderford |
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 20:08:31 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
erwin welsch |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:56:52 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:28:46 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:59:02 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:16:48 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:38:14 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:30:50 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:09:20 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:52:56 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:23:35 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:50:10 -0400 |
24 lines |
query: Eliot and film
|
<> |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:41:18 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film (Marx and stage)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:16:17 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: query: Eliot and film (Marx and stage)
|
Brian Vanderford |
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:14:37 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Question.
|
<> |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:46:47 EDT |
61 lines |
Re: Question.
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:05:09 -0400 |
46 lines |
Question.
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:53:32 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:51:15 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:28:25 -0500 |
152 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:49:21 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:26:20 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:55:20 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:41:04 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:46:24 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:33:11 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:11:20 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:39:08 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:30:01 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:29:33 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:47:41 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:26:49 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
<> |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:03:56 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:39:54 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:10:21 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 19:28:11 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:58:04 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:30:56 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:58:57 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:54:48 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:42:51 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:45:25 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 22:48:43 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 16:01:01 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:09:39 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 10:18:51 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Readers of poems
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:46:08 +0100 |
19 lines |
Readers of poems
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:20:31 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 20:09:02 -0700 |
170 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
<> |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:31:04 EDT |
22 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
<> |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:26:36 EDT |
99 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:59:22 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:53:01 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:57:26 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:45:55 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (Errata)
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:32:21 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: Readers of poems (essentially off topic and certainly random)
|
<> |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:13:33 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Readers of poems -- Hopkins
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:41:24 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Readers of poems -- Hopkins
|
<> |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:22:21 EDT |
21 lines |
Re: Readers of poems--"sink in"
|
erwin welsch |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 19:59:02 -0700 |
220 lines |
Re: Readers of poems--"sink in"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:14:57 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Readers of poems--"sink in"
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:16:14 -0400 |
198 lines |
Re: real Burnt Norton (was: Milton, Austen, Eliot...)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:23:52 -0700 |
22 lines |
real Burnt Norton (was: Milton, Austen, Eliot...)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:42:09 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
erwin welsch |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 04:02:14 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:12:45 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:07:20 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:38:24 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:29:40 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
dorothy peters |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:49:33 -0700 |
11 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:26:38 -0400 |
12 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:15:57 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:20:50 +0100 |
36 lines |
Recording of TWL available?
|
dorothy peters |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:40:14 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?- Yes
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:29:26 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: Recording of TWL available?- Yes
|
Arwin van Arum |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:17:25 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: Reply to Nancy in Gerontion discussion
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 22:32:28 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: Reply to Nancy in Gerontion discussion
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:56:00 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Reply to Nancy in Gerontion discussion
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:27:29 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Reply to Nancy in Gerontion discussion
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:32:54 -0700 |
32 lines |
Reply to Nancy in Gerontion discussion
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:54:32 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Rick Parker's Eliot lecture citation: source?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:38:43 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Rick Parker's Eliot lecture citation: source?
|
erwin welsch |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:41:10 -0700 |
107 lines |
Re: Rick Parker's Eliot lecture citation: source?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 22:31:44 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: Rick Parker's Eliot lecture citation: source?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:44:59 -0400 |
62 lines |
Rick Parker's Eliot lecture citation: source?
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:37:39 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Rolling the 'Ultimate Burbank' ball toward some overwhelming question
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 09:03:46 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Rolling the 'Ultimate Burbank' ball toward some overwhelming question
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:14:18 -0400 |
34 lines |
Rolling the 'Ultimate Burbank' ball toward some overwhelming question
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:13:37 EDT |
69 lines |
Re: Samuel Johnson Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
<> |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:09:28 EDT |
48 lines |
Re: Samuel Johnson Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 18:33:33 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: Samuel Johnson Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:26:45 -0400 |
23 lines |
Samuel Johnson Re: OT: SWITZERLAND'S NATIONAL DAY
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 18:19:43 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:05:05 -0700 |
87 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:59:50 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:45:57 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:47:16 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:34:49 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:00:20 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:39:14 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:12:52 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: Sara's post on Jennifer's last call and standarised spelling
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 14:52:32 +0100 |
224 lines |
Re: Sept. 8, 2002 Memorial Poetry Reading
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:52:16 -0700 |
109 lines |
Sept. 8, 2002 Memorial Poetry Reading
|
<> |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:12:29 EDT |
86 lines |
Re: Source required
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:50:49 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Source required
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:53:30 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: Source required
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:34:42 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Source required
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 20:24:07 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Source required
|
Rickard A Parker |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:41:14 -0400 |
31 lines |
Source required
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:43:24 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:18:15 -0700 |
82 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
<> |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:16:47 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:05:28 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:07:00 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:03:58 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:56:34 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:47:16 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:51:57 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:25:57 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:32:56 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Sara Trevisan |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:22:14 +0200 |
98 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:03:30 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Speakin' English
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:06:19 -0400 |
42 lines |
Speakin' English
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:50:07 -0400 |
23 lines |
Speakin' Geometry
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:15:33 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: syllables in pomegranate
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:32:51 -0700 |
111 lines |
Re: syllables in pomegranate
|
Sara Trevisan |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 10:55:27 +0200 |
101 lines |
Re: syllables in pomegranate
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:04:34 -0700 |
149 lines |
Re: syllables in pomegranate
|
Sara Trevisan |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 23:48:44 +0200 |
102 lines |
Re: Synonyms
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:25:50 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Synonyms
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:17:39 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Synonyms
|
Sara Trevisan |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 20:12:21 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: teaching the Constitution + Gerontion discussion
|
Venus Freeman |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 21:52:07 -0400 |
226 lines |
teaching the Constitution + Gerontion discussion
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 02:32:44 -0400 |
205 lines |
The end of written grammar? (OT)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:41:56 -0700 |
9 lines |
The Story of an effect. (relevant to EFFECT as criterion)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:54:47 -0700 |
16 lines |
The transformation of language: Experience becomes reflection
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:16:21 -0700 |
194 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:53:29 -0500 |
121 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:48:45 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:36:39 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:59:53 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:12:37 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
<> |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 20:52:19 EDT |
72 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:33:21 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:15:45 -0400 |
10 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:51:24 -0400 |
85 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:22:55 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
dorothy peters |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:41:13 -0700 |
139 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:19:15 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:23:19 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:13:16 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:34:06 -0500 |
149 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
<> |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:42:20 EDT |
23 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
<> |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:41:34 EDT |
22 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
<> |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:38:27 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:52:20 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:28:16 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:32:00 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:08:23 -0400 |
163 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:35:30 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:49:53 -0400 |
142 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 01:12:20 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:55:38 -0500 |
145 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:04:31 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:45:58 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Robert Summers |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:15:26 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: the writer and his work
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 05:15:04 +0200 |
26 lines |
the writer and his work
|
Aidan Harman |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 12:47:07 +0100 |
149 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:24:09 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:03:24 EDT |
87 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:01:34 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:57:21 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:00:33 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:12:22 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: the writer and the work
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 18:12:10 -0400 |
80 lines |
Time past and time future
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:18:39 -0400 |
25 lines |
TSE An Anecdote
|
Aidan Harman |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 20:32:41 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
D.Gregory Griffith |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:04:07 -0400 |
83 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:48:11 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:39:21 -0700 |
17 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:35:53 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:28:34 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:22:26 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
erwin welsch |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:32:09 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:58:54 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:06:07 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:13:11 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:51:56 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:31:33 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:11:32 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:47:40 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Aidan Harman |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:22:11 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:06:18 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: TSE An Anecdote and Addendum
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:16:48 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: TSE and film: Thanks!
|
<> |
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:22:08 -0400 |
308 lines |
Re: TSE and film: Thanks!
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:17:09 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: TSE and film: Thanks!
|
<> |
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:13:49 +0100 |
269 lines |
TSE and film: Thanks!
|
<> |
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:22:37 -0400 |
130 lines |
TSE list archive information
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:05:33 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: TSE on film vs stage
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 20:34:38 -0700 |
103 lines |
Re: TSE on film vs stage
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:11:42 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: TSE on film vs stage
|
<> |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:56:19 -0400 |
120 lines |
TSE on film vs stage
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 10:31:29 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: un Pound-ed
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:52:00 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: un Pound-ed
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 12:05:25 -0400 |
54 lines |
un Pound-ed
|
Brian Vanderford |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 09:56:48 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: way off topic (was: TSE on film vs stage)
|
erwin welsch |
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:23:01 -0700 |
118 lines |
way off topic (was: TSE on film vs stage)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:38:58 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: What are problematic topics?
|
dorothy peters |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:04:57 -0700 |
92 lines |
What are problematic topics?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:17:14 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: WHY are problematic topics. . . ? (OT--what is "topic"?)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:23:19 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: WHY--are problematic topics?
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:26:07 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Wouldn't Eliot just love this bit of no bull savagery!
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 09:55:42 -0500 |
24 lines |
Wouldn't Eliot just love this bit of no bull savagery!
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 22:29:56 -0700 |
183 lines |
