|
|
|
Size
|
Re:
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:50:35 -0400 |
12 lines |
RE: "Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:18:20 -0700 |
35 lines |
RE: "Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:33:07 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: "Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 17:11:47 -0400 |
29 lines |
RE: "Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:40:57 -0700 |
34 lines |
Re: "Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Ken Armstrong |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:21:15 -0400 |
26 lines |
"Eeldrop and Appleplex"
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:00:48 -0400 |
21 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:23:07 -0700 |
204 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:39:20 -0400 |
177 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Earls, JP |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:23:29 -0500 |
172 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Lynne Riordan |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:39:12 +0100 |
183 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:46:05 -0700 |
157 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Lynne Riordan |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:31:56 +0100 |
117 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:44:58 +0200 |
29 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
David Rees |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:41:23 +0100 |
109 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:24:36 -0700 |
19 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:13:37 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Fri, 05 Jul 2002 09:51:15 +0200 |
61 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Earls, JP |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:47:31 -0500 |
49 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Earls, JP |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 20:37:23 -0500 |
70 lines |
RE: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 16:49:44 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:48:21 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Carrol Cox |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 13:31:28 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 19:56:59 +0200 |
17 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Jacek Niecko |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:17:11 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 13:06:51 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:55:04 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: "l'entre deux guerres"
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:48:33 +0200 |
33 lines |
"l'entre deux guerres"
|
Earls, JP |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:53:26 -0500 |
16 lines |
Re: "spot on"
|
Amanda Harris |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:04:01 +0100 |
43 lines |
<No subject>
|
dipanwita das |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:31:46 +0530 |
61 lines |
<No subject>
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:25:26 -0400 |
33 lines |
<No subject>
|
Michael Funk |
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:10:07 -0400 |
18 lines |
<No subject>
|
PETER DILLANE |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:14:49 +1000 |
11 lines |
<No subject>
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:43:56 +0100 |
6 lines |
<No subject>
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 23:03:26 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: A-SITTING ON A GATE
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 14:12:59 -0400 |
28 lines |
A-SITTING ON A GATE
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 14:08:14 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Analogy about "Anonoetic"
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 01 Jul 2002 13:22:54 -0400 |
18 lines |
RE: Analogy about "Anonoetic"
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:58:42 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Another view of La Figlia
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:33:22 -0700 |
112 lines |
Re: Another view of La Figlia
|
Ken Armstrong |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:55:43 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Another view of La Figlia
|
Earls, JP |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:43:55 -0500 |
30 lines |
Another view of La Figlia
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:26:52 -0400 |
14 lines |
appleseed
|
Frances Rushworth |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:19:01 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: Article by Cook on Marina
|
Sara Trevisan |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:31:42 +0200 |
55 lines |
re: atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:29:07 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:42:03 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: atheism
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 19:45:56 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: atheism
|
Frances Rushworth |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:05:13 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:30:37 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
<> |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:43:38 EDT |
32 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:39:32 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
<> |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:35:03 EDT |
38 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:27:31 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
<> |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:17:43 EDT |
16 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:57:16 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:00:21 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: Battle of minds
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:33:35 -0700 |
81 lines |
Battle of minds
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:08:24 +0200 |
83 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:52:08 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:59:14 -0400 |
105 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:26:04 +0200 |
95 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:08:28 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:58:17 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:24:48 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Carrols's List
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 01:24:09 +0200 |
20 lines |
David S. Harre/CPD/HHQ/HUD is out of the office.
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:00:44 -0400 |
12 lines |
Dissociation (was hyacinths)
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 14:44:11 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:15:19 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 03:54:51 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 03:53:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:52:38 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:35:27 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 03:24:24 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: E and Shelley
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:11:58 -0700 |
35 lines |
E and Shelley
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:58:54 +0100 |
67 lines |
E.a nd Shelley
|
Amanda Harris |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:25:47 +0100 |
58 lines |
Eeldrop and Appleplex
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:27:56 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Eliot among the minds
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:39:34 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Eliot among the minds
|
INGELBIEN RAPHAEL |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:57:31 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Eliot among the minds
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:53:24 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Eliot among the minds
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:45:20 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Eliot among the minds
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:30:55 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:10:30 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:43:59 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:00:02 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:35:58 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:05:38 -0400 |
139 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:02:15 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
erwin welsch |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:42:14 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 01:05:52 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 23:24:47 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 23:10:40 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 23:08:33 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 22:55:32 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 22:55:41 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:00:47 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 20:47:52 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:31:25 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:19:31 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Lynne Riordan |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 19:18:17 +0100 |
272 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:10:13 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:07:24 -0400 |
333 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:03:50 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:45:19 -0700 |
313 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Carrol Cox |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 23:11:02 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:54:59 -0400 |
234 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Lynne Riordan |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:05:58 +0100 |
191 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:00:39 -0400 |
167 lines |
RE: eliot's atheism
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:14:52 -0700 |
159 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Lynne Riordan |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:37:28 +0100 |
134 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:51:20 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:56:39 EDT |
28 lines |
RE: eliot's atheism
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:36:20 -0400 |
159 lines |
RE: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:19:04 -0700 |
133 lines |
RE: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:17:23 -0700 |
160 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:32:14 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Lynne Riordan |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:19:43 +0100 |
144 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:59:15 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:33:12 EDT |
83 lines |
RE: eliot's atheism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:37:16 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:36:54 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:37:37 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:26:03 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: eliot's atheism
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:17:03 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
<> |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:44:00 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:22:02 +0100 |
113 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:33:24 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:23:59 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:33:47 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:32:08 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
<> |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:41:16 EDT |
71 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
<> |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:31:36 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:24:23 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:23:52 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: Eliot's Jealousy-Raising Quotient
|
Ken Armstrong |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:59:44 -0400 |
109 lines |
Re: Eliot's mysticism
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 13:16:51 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: Eliot's mysticism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:19:55 -0700 |
90 lines |
Re: Eliot's mysticism
|
Lynne Riordan |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:04:00 +0100 |
76 lines |
re: Eliot's mysticism
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:42:19 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: eliot's non-atheism
|
Ken Armstrong |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:23:52 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: From the beyond
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:30:11 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: From the beyond
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:02:25 -0500 |
50 lines |
From the beyond
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:15:43 +0100 |
29 lines |
God and Poets
|
<> |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:48:50 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:10:41 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:02:42 EDT |
36 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
dipanwita das |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:43:02 +0530 |
56 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:16:32 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
<> |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:57:22 EDT |
43 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:39:07 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
<> |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:19:27 EDT |
38 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
Amanda Harris |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:31:07 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: Hi again
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:20:46 -0400 |
19 lines |
Hi again
|
Amanda Harris |
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:48:22 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Highbury
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:57:44 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Highbury
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:09:00 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Highbury
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:36:05 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: Highbury
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:03:20 +0100 |
35 lines |
Highbury
|
erik verhaar |
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 23:42:09 +0200 |
21 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:05:15 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:19:13 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Jacek Niecko |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 06:59:10 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:40:28 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:05:51 -0400 |
28 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:57:32 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:41:07 -0400 |
16 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:38:59 -0700 |
37 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:04:55 -0700 |
107 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:59:21 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:31:14 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:54:13 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:28:37 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 23:51:34 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 23:35:09 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 20:23:15 EDT |
18 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:27:36 -0400 |
14 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 22:45:15 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:48:01 -0500 |
10 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:43:25 -0400 |
98 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Carrol Cox |
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:25:30 -0500 |
34 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:27:44 -0700 |
147 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:17:22 -0400 |
93 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:40:41 -0700 |
48 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:17:32 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:40:24 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:56:32 EDT |
35 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:55:48 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:19:40 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:56:04 -0400 |
13 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:09:23 -0700 |
42 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:02:30 -0700 |
75 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:15:54 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Carrol Cox |
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 21:45:29 -0500 |
21 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:32:38 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 09:39:27 -0400 |
14 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:48:15 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 00:11:58 EDT |
40 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:43:52 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:31:00 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 23:39:49 EDT |
48 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:00:07 -0400 |
25 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 16:32:38 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:40:22 EDT |
59 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:00:50 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:12:06 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:13:28 EDT |
69 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:05:55 EDT |
1336 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 17:28:19 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 15:06:32 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 13:52:17 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 13:25:42 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 13:15:11 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:48:11 -0400 |
91 lines |
RE: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:31:53 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:02:06 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:56:23 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 09:48:07 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:42:07 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:38:41 -0400 |
94 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:18:18 EDT |
40 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 01 Jul 2002 13:09:03 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
<> |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:39:52 EDT |
47 lines |
Re: Hyacinths (was: Roses)--implications?
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 01:40:02 -0400 |
40 lines |
late Donne & Ariel Poems (was: Dissociation / hyacinths)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:34:46 -0700 |
52 lines |
List Query
|
Earls, JP |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:59:05 -0500 |
14 lines |
Re: Lists, with apologies to G & S
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:06:29 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Lists, with apologies to G & S
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:59:34 -0700 |
40 lines |
Lists, with apologies to G & S
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:49:49 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:38:34 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:23:40 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:27:49 -0700 |
17 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:25:38 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
<> |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:42:15 EDT |
59 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:55:44 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:48:29 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:38:35 -0400 |
136 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:51:37 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:36:36 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Scott Lenney |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:17:05 EDT |
30 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:43:20 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:43:19 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:40:47 EDT |
41 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:37:36 EDT |
39 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:23:21 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:28:05 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:20:48 -0700 |
94 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:50:02 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:30:16 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:42:58 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:29:38 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:00:44 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:45:08 EDT |
42 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:11:53 +0200 |
576 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:07:42 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:04:50 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:49:51 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:48:14 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Brian Vanderford |
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 14:51:11 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:42:19 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:33:37 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:14:21 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Marcia Karp |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:02:54 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:56:39 +0100 |
128 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Ken Armstrong |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:55:41 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:57:02 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:30:45 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
erwin welsch |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:55:16 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:51:10 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:56:32 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Carrol Cox |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:31:45 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Nancy Gish |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:40:02 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:52:30 +0100 |
13 lines |
Re: London in TWL
|
Amanda Harris |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:48:19 +0100 |
26 lines |
London in TWL
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:16:54 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: Marina
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:44:53 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: Marina
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 01:15:27 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Marina
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 01:04:41 +0200 |
27 lines |
Marina
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:18:20 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Marina
|
<> |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:42:46 EDT |
24 lines |
Re: Marina
|
Earls, JP |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:34:23 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Marina
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:38:29 -0400 |
37 lines |
Marina
|
Sara Trevisan |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:08:58 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: Marina and Tennyson
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:57:34 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: Marina and Tennyson
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:07:12 +0100 |
19 lines |
Mining
|
<> |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:34:22 EDT |
45 lines |
Re: Narcissus and Sebastian...also Shelley
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:43:55 -0700 |
53 lines |
Narcissus and Sebastian...also Shelley
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:21:25 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: Now how would Eliot know this? ;->
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:03:54 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Now how would Eliot know this? ;->
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:37:57 -0400 |
18 lines |
Now how would Eliot know this? ;->
|
Peter Montgomery |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 01:55:46 -0700 |
30 lines |
Odd man in.
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:06:59 -0700 |
18 lines |
Re: Off Topic: Query regarding page cutting
|
erwin welsch |
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 12:42:19 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Off Topic: Query regarding page cutting
|
Nancy Gish |
Sat, 6 Jul 2002 15:59:14 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Off Topic: Query regarding page cutting
|
Marcia Karp |
Sat, 06 Jul 2002 15:50:32 -0400 |
32 lines |
Off Topic: Query regarding page cutting
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sat, 6 Jul 2002 20:01:35 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Off Topic: Query regarding page cutting and Reply to Nancy re allusion in East Coker
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:17:41 +0100 |
56 lines |
On Flowers and Memory: a reply to Nancy
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:57:49 +0100 |
102 lines |
Once more unto the breach, dear friends.
|
Peter Montgomery |
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 23:27:26 -0700 |
22 lines |
OT: Maine
|
erwin welsch |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:45:34 -0700 |
153 lines |
OT: Riddle (was: Hi again)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:41:07 -0700 |
34 lines |
RE: Pound's use of Eliot
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:24:41 -0700 |
65 lines |
RE: Pound's use of Eliot
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:12:12 -0700 |
51 lines |
RE: Pound's use of Eliot
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:52:40 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Pound's use of Eliot
|
Carrol Cox |
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 21:00:56 -0500 |
39 lines |
Pound's use of Eliot
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:30:22 -0400 |
13 lines |
Re: Query
|
<> |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:01:44 EDT |
54 lines |
Re: Query
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:04:08 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: Query
|
Gunnar Jauch |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:41:53 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Query
|
Melusina |
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 10:25:46 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: Query
|
Marcia Karp |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:51:02 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Query
|
erwin welsch |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:47:15 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Query
|
Marcia Karp |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:33:42 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: Query
|
<> |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 20:24:22 EDT |
36 lines |
Query
|
Marcia Karp |
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:03:47 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Robert Summers |
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:44:43 -0400 |
91 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:18:56 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 18:10:17 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Lynne Riordan |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 21:20:18 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Lynne Riordan |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 21:18:25 +0100 |
31 lines |
RE: Re TSE and gardening
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:04:21 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:58:39 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
<> |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:27:12 EDT |
19 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Carrol Cox |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:22:55 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Re TSE and gardening
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 11:28:24 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re TSE and gardening
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:53:31 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: Relies to various posts
|
Amanda Harris |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:38:04 +0100 |
15 lines |
Relies to various posts
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:12:35 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Richmond (was: Highbury)
|
Nancy Gish |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:44:16 -0400 |
85 lines |
Re: Richmond (was: Highbury)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:05:58 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: Richmond (was: Highbury)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:24:17 -0700 |
62 lines |
Richmond (was: Highbury)
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:51:50 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Riddle (was: Hi again)
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:05:10 -0700 |
47 lines |
RE: Sterne, Joyce et al
|
Peter Montgomery |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:38:44 -0700 |
53 lines |
Sterne, Joyce et al
|
<> |
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 14:13:25 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Sweeney Among the Nightingales: A query
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:19:12 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Sweeney Among the Nightingales: A query
|
Nancy Gish |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:34:30 -0400 |
36 lines |
Sweeney Among the Nightingales: A query
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:17:09 +0100 |
56 lines |
Test
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:31:26 -0400 |
11 lines |
Test
|
Marcia Karp |
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:29:01 -0400 |
10 lines |
Thanks for the comments
|
Rickard A. Parker |
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 17:07:30 -0400 |
19 lines |
The Duke is King
|
Marcia Karp |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:25:20 -0400 |
12 lines |
RE: The Hippotamus & atheism
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:21:30 -0700 |
50 lines |
The Waste Land - Blick ins Chaos
|
erik verhaar |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:27:48 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: TSE and St John of the Cross: Allusion or borrowing?
|
Nancy Gish |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:17:45 -0400 |
139 lines |
TSE and St John of the Cross: Allusion or borrowing?
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:11:39 +0100 |
109 lines |
RE: TSE and St John of the Cross: Warning, this post is quite lon g
|
Peter Montgomery |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:58:29 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: TSE and St John of the Cross: Warning, this post is quite long
|
Nancy Gish |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:48:14 -0400 |
94 lines |
TSE and St John of the Cross: Warning, this post is quite long
|
Jennifer Formichelli |
Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:16:49 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: UNSUBSCRIBE
|
Willow |
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:55:37 +1000 |
57 lines |
UNSUBSCRIBE
|
Sobdo |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 21:37:18 +0530 |
34 lines |
UNSUBSCRIBE
|
Silvia Pisano |
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 19:11:59 +0000 |
13 lines |
Re: Uses of biography
|
Peter Montgomery |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:36:33 -0700 |
29 lines |
Uses of biography
|
Marcia Karp |
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:47:55 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Why not a triologue?
|
Peter Montgomery |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:55:19 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Why not a triologue?
|
Meyer Robert K GS-9 99 CES/CECT |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:27:43 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Why not a triologue?
|
Marcia Karp |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:46:47 -0400 |
19 lines |
Why not a triologue?
|
<> |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:26:08 -0700 |
32 lines |